Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:52:25.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ultraviolet Studies of Cepheids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2018

Erika Böhm-Vitense
Erika Böhm-Vitense*
Affiliation:
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington Guest observer with the International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE) Satellite

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We discuss whether with new evolutionary tracks we still have a problem fitting the Cepheids and their evolved companions on the appropriate evolutionary tracks. We find that with the Bertelli et al. tracks with convective overshoot by one pressure scale hight the problem is essentially removed though somewhat more mixing would give still better fits.

Using results of recent nonlinear hydrodynamic calculations by Morgan we find that we also have no problem matching the observed pulsation periods of the Cepheids with those expected from their new evolutionary masses, provided that Cepheids with periods less than 9 days are overtone pulsators.

We investigate possible mass loss of Cepheids from UV studies of the companion spectrum of S Mus and from the ultraviolet spectra of the long period Cepheid Carinae. For S Mus with a period of 9.6 days we derive an upper limit for the mass loss of M < 10-9 M⊙, if a standard velocity law is assumed for the wind. For Carinae with a period of 35.5 days we find a probable mass loss of M ∼ 10-5±2 M⊙.

Type
Windows on the Instability Strip
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 139: New Perspectives on Stellar Pulsation and Pulsating Variable Stars , 1993 , pp. 387 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

References

Alongi, M., Bertelli, G., Bressan, A., and Chiosi, C. 1991, Astr. Astrophys., 244, 95.Google Scholar
Becker, S. and Cox, A. N. 1982, Ap.J., 260, 707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, S. A. 1981, Ap. J. Suppl., 45, 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertelli, G., Bressan, A., Chiosi, C., and Angerer, K. 1986, Astr. Astrophys. Suppl., 66, 191.Google Scholar
Böhm-Vitense, E. and Proffitt, C. 1985, Ap. J., 296, 175.Google Scholar
Böhm-Vitense, E., Clark, M., Cottrell, P. L. and Wallerstein, G. 1990, A.J., 99, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhm-Vitense, E., 1986, Ap. J., 303, 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhm-Vitense, E. 1990, Ap. J., 324, L27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhm-Vitense, E. and Love, S. 1992, submitted to Ap. J.Google Scholar
Buchler, J. R., Moskalic, P. and Kovacs, G. 1990, Ap. J., 351, 617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiosi, C., Wood, P. R., Bertelli, G., Bressan, A., and Mateo, M. 1992, Ap. J., 385, 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiosi, C. and Wood, P. R. 1990, referenced by Chiosi, C. 1990, in ASP Conference Publ. 11, 158.Google Scholar
Cox, A.N. 1980, Ann. Rev. Astr. Astrophys., 18, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deasy, H. P. and Butler, C. J. 1986, Nature, 320, 726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. R. and Bolton, C. T. 1990, Ap. J., 356, 630.Google Scholar
Iglesias, C. A. and Rogers, F. G. 1991, Ap. J., 371, 408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maeder, A. and Meynet, G. 1988, Astr. Astrophys., 76, 411.Google Scholar
Mc Alary, C. W. and Welch, D. L. 1986, A. J., 91, 1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, S. 1991, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, L. and Böhm-Vitense, E. 1992, Ap.J., Dec. 20.Google Scholar
Sandage, A. and Tammann, G. A. 1969, Ap. J., 157, 683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stothers, R. B. and Chin, C. W. 1991, Ap. J., 381, L67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willson, L. A. and Bowen, G. H. 1986, Ir. Astron. J., 17, 2.Google Scholar