Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Scoping Review of Work Disability Policies and Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2017

Ellen MacEachen
Affiliation:
School of Public Health and Health Systems, University Of Waterloo, Canada
Bronson Du
Affiliation:
School of Public Health and Health Systems, University Of Waterloo, Canada
Emma Bartel
Affiliation:
School of Public Health and Health Systems, University Of Waterloo, Canada
Kerstin Ekberg
Affiliation:
Linkoping University, Sweden
Emile Tompa
Affiliation:
Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Canada
Agnieszka Kosny
Affiliation:
Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Canada
Ivana Petricone
Affiliation:
IAVGO Community Legal Clinic, Canada
Jackie Stapleton
Affiliation:
School of Public Health and Health Systems, University Of Waterloo, Canada
Corresponding

Abstract

Purpose: This scoping review identifies the foci of research articles that address government laws, policies and programs designed to foster labour market integration of people who, due to illness or disability, face challenges entering or staying in the workforce. Method: A systematic search of English-language peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2014 yielded 14,474 articles. Title and abstract review identified 723 included articles that addressed government-led programs, policy or legislation on work integration and/or income support after injury, illness or impairment. These were sorted by theme, work disability program or policy, disability type, jurisdiction and year published. Results: The number of articles published that address work disability laws, policies and programs increased steadily. Most articles addressed disability in general. Among articles with a specific health focus, mental health was the most common. Research gaps are identified for mixed method study designs, chronic and episodic conditions, illness and cancer, and for work disability policy studies outside of North America, Northern Europe and Australia. Conclusions: We find a growing number of published articles about work disability and policy and identify specific areas where is a need for further research.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8 (1), 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clasen, J., & Oorschot, W.V. (2002). Changing principles in European social security. European Journal of Social Security, 4 (2), 89115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa-Black, K.M., Feuerstein, M., & Loisel, P. (2014). Work disability models: Past and present. In Loisel, P., Anema, J.R., Feuerstein, M., MacEachen, E., & Costa-Black, K. (Eds.), Handbook of work disability: Prevention and management (pp. 7194). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Centre for Research on Work Disabilty Policy. (2016). Work Disability Policy Scoping Review Database. Retrieved from https://www.crwdp.ca/en/work-disability-policy-scoping-review-database Google Scholar
Dewa, C., Trojanowski, L., Loong, D., & Hoch, J. (2013). An overview of provincial disability programs and work incentives/disincentives. In The aspiring workforce: Employment and income for people with serious mental illness. Mental Health Commission of Canada.Google Scholar
Dropping, J.A., Hvinden, B., & Oorschot, W.V. (2000). Reconstruction and reorientation: Changing disability policies in the Netherlands and Norway. European Journal of Social Security, 2 (1), 3568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagliard, A.R., & Dobrow, M.J. (2011). Paucity of qualitative research in general medical and health services and policy research journals: Analysis of publication rates. BMC Health Services Research, 11, 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, D., Gomez-Redondo, R., & Dupre, M. (2015). Studying disability trends in aging populations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 30 (1), 2149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jetha, A., Pransky, G., & Hettinger, L.J. (2016). Capturing complexity in work disability research: Application of system dynamics modeling methodology. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38 (2), 189194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Law Commission of Ontario. (2012, December). Vulnerable workers and precarious work: Final report. Toronto, ON: Author.Google Scholar
Loisel, P., Anema, H., Feuerstein, M., MacEachen, E., Pransky, G., & Costa-Black, K. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of work disability: Prevention and management. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Loisel, P., & Cote, P. (2013). The work disability paradigm and its public health implications. In Loisel, P., Anema, H., Feuerstein, M., Pransky, G., MacEachen, E., & Kosta-Black, C. (Eds), Handbook of work disability: Prevention and management. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacEachen, E., Du, B., Bartel, E., Tompa, E., Stapleton, J., Kosny, A., . . . Ekberg, K. (2015). Work Disability Policy Scoping Review Database. Retrieved from https://www.crwdp.ca/en/work-disability-policy-scoping-review-database Google Scholar
MacEachen, E., Kosny, A., Ferrier, S., & Chambers, L. (2010). The ‘toxic dose’ of system problems: Why some injured workers don't return to work as expected. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20 (3), 349366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, G. (2010). Evidence-based health policy: A preliminary systematic review. Health Education Journal, 69 (1), 4347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, D.L. (2015). From themes to hypotheses: Following up with quantitative methods. Qualitative Health Research, 25 (6), 789793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nastasia, I., Coutu, M.-F., & Tcaciuc, R. (2014). Topics and trends in research on non-clinical interventions aimed at preventing prolonged work disability in workers compensated for work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs): A systematic, comprehensive literature review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36 (22), 18411856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Sickness, disability and work: Keeping track in the economic downturn. Background paper. Paper presented May 14–15 at the High Level Forum, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers: A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. Paris, France: Author. doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264088856-en.Google Scholar
Oldfield, M., MacEachen, E., Kirsh, B., & McNeil, M. (2016). Impromptu everyday disclosure dances: How women with stigmatised chronic illnesses respond to disclosure risks at work. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38 (15), 14421453. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1103794 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oorschot, W.V., & Boos, K. (2000). The battle against numbers: Disability policies in the Netherlands. European Journal of Social Security, 2 (4), 343361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pransky, G., Loisel, P., & Anema, H. (2011). Work disability prevention research: Current and future prospects. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21, 287292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinlan, M. (2004). Workers’ compensation and the challenges posed by changing patterns of work: Evidence from Australia. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 2 (1), 2552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, I.Z., & Gatchel, R.J. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of return to work: From research to practice. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seing, E., MacEachen, E., Ekberg, K., & Stahl, C. (2015). Return to work or job transition? Employer dilemmas in taking social responsibility for return to work in local workplace practice. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37 (19), 17601769. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.978509 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shuey, K.M., & Jovic, E. (2013). Disability accommodation in nonstandard and precarious employment arrangements. Work and Occupations, 40 (2), 174205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tricco, A.C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Kastner, M., . . . Straus, S.E. (2016). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16 (1), 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddell, G. (1998). The back pain revolution. Toronto, ON: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Wisdom, J.P., Cavaleri, M.A., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Green, C.A. (2012). Methodological reporting in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods health services research articles. Health Services Research, 47 (2), 721745. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01344.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 58
Total number of PDF views: 275 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th June 2017 - 16th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-77fc7d77f9-cjctk Total loading time: 0.239 Render date: 2021-01-16T09:12:52.597Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Sat Jan 16 2021 08:51:32 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": true, "languageSwitch": true, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Scoping Review of Work Disability Policies and Programs
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Scoping Review of Work Disability Policies and Programs
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Scoping Review of Work Disability Policies and Programs
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *