Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 12
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    James, C. L. Reneman, M. F. and Gross, D. P. 2016. Functional Capacity Evaluation Research: Report from the Second International Functional Capacity Evaluation Research Meeting. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Vol. 26, Issue. 1, p. 80.

    Meyer, Katharina Klipstein, Andreas Oesch, Peter Jansen, Beatrice Kool, Jan and Niedermann, Karin 2016. Development and Validation of a Pain Behavior Assessment in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Vol. 26, Issue. 1, p. 103.

    Trippolini, M. A. Dijkstra, P. U. Geertzen, J. H. B. and Reneman, M. F. 2015. Construct Validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation in Patients with Whiplash-Associated Disorders. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 481.

    Bieniek, Sebastian and Bethge, Matthias 2014. The reliability of WorkWell Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol. 15, Issue. 1,

    Haschke, Anne Abberger, Birgit Wirtz, Markus Bengel, Jürgen and Baumeister, Harald 2013. Development of short form questionnaires for the assessment of work capacity in cardiovascular rehabilitation patients. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, Vol. 26, Issue. 5,

    James, Carole Mackenzie, Lynette and Capra, Mike 2013. Quantification of the Safe Maximal Lift in Functional Capacity Evaluations: Comparison of Muscle Recruitment Using SEMG and Therapist Observation. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Vol. 23, Issue. 3, p. 419.

    Oesch, Peter Meyer, Kathrin Jansen, Beatrice Mowinckel, Petter Bachmann, Stefan and Hagen, Kare Birger 2012. What Is the Role of “Nonorganic Somatic Components” in Functional Capacity Evaluations in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain Undergoing Fitness for Work Evaluation?. Spine, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. E243.

    James, Carole Mackenzie, Lynette and Capra, Mike 2011. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the manual handling component of the WorkHab Functional Capacity Evaluation. Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 33, Issue. 19-20, p. 1797.

    Schultz-Johnson, Karen 2011. Rehabilitation of the Hand and Upper Extremity, 2-Volume Set.

    Spanjer, Jerry Groothoff, Johan W. and Brouwer, Sandra 2011. Instruments used to assess functional limitations in workers applying for disability benefit: a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 33, Issue. 22-23, p. 2143.

    James, Carole and Mackenzie, Lynette 2009. Health Professional’s Perceptions and Practices in Relation to Functional Capacity Evaluations: Results of a Quantitative Survey. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Vol. 19, Issue. 2, p. 203.

    Wind, Haije Gouttebarge, Vincent Kuijer, P. Paul F. M. Sluiter, Judith K. and Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W. 2009. Complementary value of functional capacity evaluation for physicians in assessing the physical work ability of workers with musculoskeletal disorders. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, Vol. 82, Issue. 4, p. 435.

  • International Journal of Disability Management, Volume 1, Issue 1
  • May 2006, pp. 135-148

Reliability and Validity of Functional Capacity Evaluations: An Update

  • Ev Innes (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 February 2012

Functional capacity evaluations (FCEs) and other work-related assessments continue to be used in occupational rehabilitation to determine the capacity of injured and disabled workers to either return to their preinjury jobs, or to determine what they are capable of doing in a work context. New instruments have been developed and others refined. There is a continuing call however for these systems to demonstrate acceptable reliability and validity. Comprehensive reviews of reliability and validity of work-related assessments were published and included information up to the end of 1997. This study updates that information by examining research conducted on five FCEs over the subsequent 8-year period (January 1998–March 2006). The Isernhagen Work Systems (IWS) FCE had the most comprehensive coverage of all aspects of reliability and validity, while the Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE) was also extensively researched. Newer FCEs show promise and should continue to be investigated. Clinicians and others are encouraged to be informed consumers of the evidence that exists for the reliability and validity of FCEs and other work-related assessments.

Corresponding author
*Address for correspondence: Ev Innes, School of Occupation & Leisure Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, PO Box 170, Lidcombe NSW 1825, Australia.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Disability Management
  • ISSN: 1833-8550
  • EISSN: 1834-4887
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-disability-management
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *