Skip to main content
×
Home

Scoping Review of Work Disability Policies and Programs

  • Ellen MacEachen (a1), Bronson Du (a1), Emma Bartel (a1), Kerstin Ekberg (a2), Emile Tompa (a3), Agnieszka Kosny (a3), Ivana Petricone (a4) and Jackie Stapleton (a1)...
Abstract

Purpose: This scoping review identifies the foci of research articles that address government laws, policies and programs designed to foster labour market integration of people who, due to illness or disability, face challenges entering or staying in the workforce. Method: A systematic search of English-language peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2014 yielded 14,474 articles. Title and abstract review identified 723 included articles that addressed government-led programs, policy or legislation on work integration and/or income support after injury, illness or impairment. These were sorted by theme, work disability program or policy, disability type, jurisdiction and year published. Results: The number of articles published that address work disability laws, policies and programs increased steadily. Most articles addressed disability in general. Among articles with a specific health focus, mental health was the most common. Research gaps are identified for mixed method study designs, chronic and episodic conditions, illness and cancer, and for work disability policy studies outside of North America, Northern Europe and Australia. Conclusions: We find a growing number of published articles about work disability and policy and identify specific areas where is a need for further research.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Ellen MacEachen, School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada. E-mail: ellen.maceachen@uwaterloo.ca
References
Hide All
Arksey H., & O'Malley L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8 (1), 1932.
Clasen J., & Oorschot W.V. (2002). Changing principles in European social security. European Journal of Social Security, 4 (2), 89115.
Costa-Black K.M., Feuerstein M., & Loisel P. (2014). Work disability models: Past and present. In Loisel P., Anema J.R., Feuerstein M., MacEachen E., & Costa-Black K. (Eds.), Handbook of work disability: Prevention and management (pp. 7194). New York, NY: Springer.
Centre for Research on Work Disabilty Policy. (2016). Work Disability Policy Scoping Review Database. Retrieved from https://www.crwdp.ca/en/work-disability-policy-scoping-review-database
Dewa C., Trojanowski L., Loong D., & Hoch J. (2013). An overview of provincial disability programs and work incentives/disincentives. In The aspiring workforce: Employment and income for people with serious mental illness. Mental Health Commission of Canada.
Dropping J.A., Hvinden B., & Oorschot W.V. (2000). Reconstruction and reorientation: Changing disability policies in the Netherlands and Norway. European Journal of Social Security, 2 (1), 3568.
Gagliard A.R., & Dobrow M.J. (2011). Paucity of qualitative research in general medical and health services and policy research journals: Analysis of publication rates. BMC Health Services Research, 11, 268.
Gu D., Gomez-Redondo R., & Dupre M. (2015). Studying disability trends in aging populations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 30 (1), 2149.
Jetha A., Pransky G., & Hettinger L.J. (2016). Capturing complexity in work disability research: Application of system dynamics modeling methodology. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38 (2), 189194.
Law Commission of Ontario. (2012, December). Vulnerable workers and precarious work: Final report. Toronto, ON: Author.
Loisel P., Anema H., Feuerstein M., MacEachen E., Pransky G., & Costa-Black K. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of work disability: Prevention and management. New York, NY: Springer.
Loisel P., & Cote P. (2013). The work disability paradigm and its public health implications. In Loisel P., Anema H., Feuerstein M., Pransky G., MacEachen E., & Kosta-Black C. (Eds), Handbook of work disability: Prevention and management. New York, NY: Springer.
MacEachen E., Du B., Bartel E., Tompa E., Stapleton J., Kosny A., . . . Ekberg K. (2015). Work Disability Policy Scoping Review Database. Retrieved from https://www.crwdp.ca/en/work-disability-policy-scoping-review-database
MacEachen E., Kosny A., Ferrier S., & Chambers L. (2010). The ‘toxic dose’ of system problems: Why some injured workers don't return to work as expected. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20 (3), 349366.
Morgan G. (2010). Evidence-based health policy: A preliminary systematic review. Health Education Journal, 69 (1), 4347.
Morgan D.L. (2015). From themes to hypotheses: Following up with quantitative methods. Qualitative Health Research, 25 (6), 789793.
Nastasia I., Coutu M.-F., & Tcaciuc R. (2014). Topics and trends in research on non-clinical interventions aimed at preventing prolonged work disability in workers compensated for work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs): A systematic, comprehensive literature review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36 (22), 18411856.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Sickness, disability and work: Keeping track in the economic downturn. Background paper. Paper presented May 14–15 at the High Level Forum, Stockholm.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers: A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. Paris, France: Author. doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264088856-en.
Oldfield M., MacEachen E., Kirsh B., & McNeil M. (2016). Impromptu everyday disclosure dances: How women with stigmatised chronic illnesses respond to disclosure risks at work. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38 (15), 14421453. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1103794
Oorschot W.V., & Boos K. (2000). The battle against numbers: Disability policies in the Netherlands. European Journal of Social Security, 2 (4), 343361.
Pransky G., Loisel P., & Anema H. (2011). Work disability prevention research: Current and future prospects. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21, 287292.
Quinlan M. (2004). Workers’ compensation and the challenges posed by changing patterns of work: Evidence from Australia. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 2 (1), 2552.
Schultz I.Z., & Gatchel R.J. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of return to work: From research to practice. New York, NY: Springer.
Seing E., MacEachen E., Ekberg K., & Stahl C. (2015). Return to work or job transition? Employer dilemmas in taking social responsibility for return to work in local workplace practice. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37 (19), 17601769. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.978509
Shuey K.M., & Jovic E. (2013). Disability accommodation in nonstandard and precarious employment arrangements. Work and Occupations, 40 (2), 174205.
Tricco A.C., Lillie E., Zarin W., O'Brien K., Colquhoun H., Kastner M., . . . Straus S.E. (2016). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16 (1), 15.
Waddell G. (1998). The back pain revolution. Toronto, ON: Churchill Livingstone.
Wisdom J.P., Cavaleri M.A., Onwuegbuzie A.J., & Green C.A. (2012). Methodological reporting in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods health services research articles. Health Services Research, 47 (2), 721745. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01344.x
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Disability Management
  • ISSN: 1833-8550
  • EISSN: 1834-4887
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-disability-management
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 44 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 174 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th June 2017 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.