Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Anthropology and the law: historicising the epistemological divide

  • Jonas Bens (a1)
Abstract

Focusing on the history of US anthropology between World War II and the high point of the Vietnam War protests in the late 1960s, this paper aims to historicise the assumed epistemological divide between anthropological and legal thinking. It is shown how anthropology as a discipline in the US has restructured some of its basic assumptions and changed its institutional structure in the context of legal interventions in larger struggles, specifically the court-based battles against racial segregation and the legal proceedings related to indigenous land rights before the Indian Claims Commission. Special consideration is given to an analysis of how objectivity is conceptualised in the literature on anthropological expert witnessing: from mechanical objectivity before 1970 to critical objectivity after 1970. The paper concludes with a caveat against exaggerating existing epistemological differences between anthropology and law, and suggests a more pragmatic approach to interdisciplinary communication.

Copyright
Corresponding author
jonas.bens@fu-berlin.de
References
Hide All
American Society of Ethnohistory (Ase) (2014) ‘About the American Society of Ethnohistory and Its History’, available at: <http://www.ethnohistory.org/about-ase>.
Ansson, Richard J. (1998) ‘The Indian Claims Commission: Did the American Indians Really Have Their Day in Court?’, American Indian Law Review 23: 207215.
Assier-Andrieu, Louis (2015) ‘Dificultad y necesidad de la antropología del derecho’, Revista de Antropología Social 24(1): 3552.
Behar, Ruth and Gordon, Deborah A. (eds) (1995) Women Writing Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Benda-Beckmann, Franz v. (1981) ‘Rechtsantropologie in Nederland’, Sociologische Gids 28: 297400.
Benedict, Ruth (1946) The Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture. Boston: Mifflin Houghton.
Bennett, John W. (1996) ‘Applied and Action Anthropology: Ideological and Conceptual Aspects’, Current Anthropology 37: S23S53.
Cahn, Edmond (1955) ‘Jurisprudence’, New York University Law Review 30: 150.
Caplan, Pat (2003) ‘Introduction: Anthropology and Ethics’ in Caplan, Pat (ed.) The Ethics of Anthropology: Debates and Dilemmas. London: Routledge, 133.
Clark, Kenneth B. (1953) ‘The Social Scientist as an Expert Witness in Civil Rights Litigation’, Social Problems 1: 510.
Clark, Kenneth B. (1960) ‘The Desegregation Cases: Criticism of the Social Scientist's Role’, Villanova Law Review 5: 224240.
Clifford, James and Marcus, George E. (eds) (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cohen, Felix S. (1947) ‘Original Indian Title’, Minnesota Law Review 32: 2859.
Danforth, Sandra C. (1972) ‘Repaying Historical Debts: The Indian Claims Commission’, North Dakota Law Review 49: 359403.
Darnell, Regna (1998) And Along Came Boas: Continuity and Revolution in Americanist Anthropology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Darnell, Regna (2008) ‘North American Traditions in Anthropology: The Historiographic Baseline’ in Kuklick, Henrika (ed.) A New History of Anthropology. Malden: Blackwell, 3551.
Daston, Lorraine (1992) ‘Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective’, Social Studies of Science 22: 597618.
Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter (1992) ‘The Image of Objectivity’, Representations 40: 81128.
Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter (2007) Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
Davidson, Michael (1992) ‘Law, Science, Causality, and Proof’, NAPA Bulletin 11(1): 2228.
Edmond, Gary (2004) ‘Thick Decisions: Expertise, Advocacy and Reasonableness in the Federal Court of Australia’, Oceania 74: 190230.
Feldman, Kerry D. (1980) ‘Ethnohistory and the Anthropologist as Expert Witness in Legal Disputes: A Southwestern Alaska Case’, Journal of Anthropological Research 36: 245257.
Fiedermutz-Laun, Annemarie (1990) ‘Adolf Bastian (1826–1905)’ in Marschall, Wolfgang (ed.) Klassiker der Kulturanthropologie: Von Montaigne bis Margaret Mead. München: Beck, 109136.
Fletcher, Matthew L. M. (2009) ‘Native American Law’ in Katz, Stanley Nider (ed.) The Oxford International Encyclopedia of Legal History. New York: Oxford University Press, 206214.
Fluehr-Lobban, Carolyn (2013) Ethics and Anthropology: Ideas and Practice. Lanham: Altamira Press.
Geertz, Clifford (1983) ‘Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective’ in Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books, 167234.
Geertz, Clifford (1988) Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Getches, David H., Wilkinson, Charles F., Williams, Robert A. and Fletcher, Matthew L. M. (2011) Cases and Materials on Federal Indian Law. St Paul: West.
Good, Anthony (2004) ‘“Undoubtedly an Expert”? Anthropologists in British Asylum Courts’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 10(1): 113133.
Gormley, Donald C. (1955) ‘The Role of the Expert Witness’, Ethnohistory 2(4): 326346.
Gregor, James (1963) ‘The Law, Social Science and School Segregation: An Assessment’, Western Reserve Law Review 14: 621636.
Griffiths, John (1986) ‘Recent Anthropology of Law in the Netherlands and Its Historical Background’ in von Benda-Beckmann, Keebet and Strijbosch, Fons (eds) Anthropology of Law in the Netherlands: Essays on Legal Pluralism. Dordrecht: Foris, 1166.
Harkin, Michael E. (2010) ‘Ethnohistory's Ethnohistory: Creating a Discipline from the Ground Up’, Social Science History 34(2): 113128.
Hartmann, Roswith (1987) ‘Hermann Trimborn (1901–1986)’, Indiana 11: 408414.
Holmberg, Allan (1964) ‘The Role of Power in Changing Values and Institutions in Vicos’ in Dobyns, Henry F., Doughty, P. and Lasswell, H. (eds) Peasants, Power, and Applied Social Change: Vicos as a Model. London: Sage, 3763.
Hymes, Dell (ed.) (1969) Reinventing Anthropology. New York: Pantheon Books.
James, Allison, Hockey, Jennifer Lorna and Dawson, Andrew H. (eds) (1997) After Writing Culture: Epistemology and Praxis in Contemporary Anthropology. London: Routledge.
Kalmuss, Debra (1981) ‘Scholars in the Courtroom: Two Models of Applied Social Science’, The American Sociologist 16(4): 212223.
Kandel, Randy Frances (1992) ‘Six Differences in Assumptions and Outlook between Anthropologists and Attorneys’, NAPA Bulletin 11(1): 14.
Killian, Lewis M. (1956) ‘The Social Scientist's Role in the Preparation of the Florida Desegregation Brief’, Social Problems 3(4): 211214.
Kluger, Richard (2004) Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and America's Struggle for Equality. New York: Knopf.
Kuklick, Henrika (2008) ‘The British Tradition’ in Kuklick, Henrika (ed.) A New History of Anthropology. Malden: Blackwell, 5278.
Lewis, Herbert (2013) In Defense of Anthropology: An Investigation of the Critique of Anthropology. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Louisell, David W. (1954) ‘The Psychologist in Today's Legal World’, Minnesota Law Review 39: 235272.
Louisell, David W. (1956) ‘The Psychologist in Today's Legal World: Part II’, Minnesota Law Review 41: 731750.
Lurie, Nancy Oestreich (1957) ‘The Indian Claims Commission Act’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 311: 5670.
Lurie, Nancy Oestreich (1978) ‘The Indian Claims Commission’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 436: 97110.
Lyall, Andrew (2008) ‘Early German Legal Anthropology: Albert Hermann Post and His Questionnaire’, Journal of African Law 52(1): 114138.
Manners, Robert A. (1956) ‘The Land Claims Cases: Anthropologists in Conflict’, Ethnohistory 3(1): 7281.
Marschelke, Jan-Christoph (2015) ‘Equal but Separate: Slavery, Racism and Post-Emancipatory Legal Equality’ in Hilgendorf, Eric, Marschelke, Jan-Christoph and Sekora, Karin (eds) Slavery as a Global and Regional Phenomenon. Heidelberg: Winter.
Maslow, Will (1960) ‘How Social Scientists Can Shape Legal Processes’, Villanova Law Review 5: 241246.
Mcgurk, Frank C. J. (1960) ‘The Law, Social Science and Academic Freedom: A Psychologist's View’, Villanova Law Review 5: 247254.
Mcmillen, Christian W. (2007) Making Indian Law: The Hualiapai Land Case and the Birth of Ethnohistory. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mills, David (2003) ‘“Like a Horse in Blinkers”? A Political History of Anthropology's Research Ethics’ in Caplan, Pat (ed.) The Ethics of Anthropology: Debates and Dilemmas. London: Routledge, 3754.
Moore, D. R. (1974) ‘Social Scientists as Suppliers of Facts: Do Lawyers Listen?’ in Thomas, William (ed.) Scientists in the Legal System: Tolerated Meddlers or Essential Contributors? Ann Arbor: Science Publishers, 97102.
Newby, Idus A. (1967) Challenge to the Court: Social Scientists and the Defense of Segregation, 1954–1966. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
Olson, Gary A. and Hirsh, Elizabeth (eds) (1995) Women Writing Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Pinkoski, Marc and Asch, Michael (2004) ‘Anthropology and Indigenous Rights in Canada and the United States: Implications of Steward's Theoretical Project’ in Barnard, Alan (ed.) Hunter-Gatherers in History, Archaeology, and Anthropology. Oxford: Berg, 187201.
Ray, Verne F. (1955) ‘Introduction’, Ethnohistory 2(4): 287291.
Rigby, Peter and Sevareid, Peter (1992) ‘Lawyers, Anthropologists, and the Knowledge of Facts’, NAPA Bulletin 11(1): 521.
Riles, Annelise (1994) ‘Representing In-Between: Law, Anthropology, and the Rhetoric of Interdisciplinarity’, University of Illinois Law Review 3: 597650.
Rose, Arnold M. (1955) ‘The Social Scientist as an Expert Witness’, Minnesota Law Review 40: 205218.
Rosen, Lawrence (1977) ‘The Anthropologist as Expert Witness’, American Anthropologist 79(3): 555578.
Rosen, Paul L. (1972) Supreme Court and Social Science. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Schlesier, Karl H. (1974) ‘Action Anthropology and the Southern Cheyenne’, Current Anthropology 15(3): 277283.
Scholte, Bob (1969) ‘Toward a Reflexive and Critical Anthropology’ in Hymes, Dell (ed.) Reinventing Anthropology. New York: Pantheon Books, 430459.
Silverman, Sydel (2005) ‘The United States’ in Barth, Fredrik, Gingrich, Andre, Parkin, Robert and Silverman, Sydel (eds) One Discipline, Four Ways: British, German, French and American Anthropology. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 257348.
Singer, Merryl (2008) ‘Applied Anthropology’ in Kuklick, Henrika (ed.) A New History of Anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 326340.
Šmitek, Zmago and Jezernik, Božidar (1995) ‘The Anthropological Tradition in Slovenia’ in Vermeulen, Han F. and Roldán, Arturo Alvarez (eds) Fieldwork and Footnotes: Studies in the History of European Anthropology. London: Routledge, 171183.
Stanley, Stan (1996) ‘Community, Action, and Continuity: A Narrative Vita of Sol Tax’, Current Anthropology 37: S131S137.
Stewart, Omer C. (1979) ‘An Expert Witness Answers Rosen’, American Anthropologist 81(1): 108111.
Tax, Sol (1958/1975) ‘Action Anthropology’, Current Anthropology 16(4): 514517.
Trimborn, Hermann (1954) ‘Richard Thurnwald’, Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 79(2): 254260.
Van Vollenhoven, Cornelis (1918–1933) Het Adatrecht van Nederlandsch-Indië, three volumes. Leiden: Brill.
Van Vollenhoven, Cornelis (1928) Ontdekking van het Adatrecht. Leiden: Brill.
Vincent, Joan (1990) Anthropology and Politics: Visions, Traditions, and Trends. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Wilkinson, Charles F. and Biggs, Eric R. (1977) ‘The Evolution of the Termination Policy’, American Indian Law Review 5(1): 139184.
Wilson, James Q. (1997) ‘Keep Social-Science “Experts” Out of the Courtroom’, Chronicle of Higher Education, 6 June: A52.
Wolfgang, Marvin E. (1974) ‘The Social Scientist in Court’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 65(2): 239247.
Wong, Kenneth K. and Nicotera, Anna C. (2004) ‘“Brown v. Board of Education” and the Coleman Report: Social Science Research and the Debate on Educational Equality’, Peabody Journal of Education 79(2): 122135.
Zenker, Olaf (2014) ‘Writing Culture’ in Jackson, John (ed.) Oxford Bibliographies Online. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zenker, Olaf and Kumoll, Karsten (eds) (2013) Beyond Writing Culture: Current Intersections of Epistemologies and Representational Practices. New York: Berghahn Books.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Law in Context
  • ISSN: 1744-5523
  • EISSN: 1744-5531
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-law-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed