Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Culture and understanding in the Singapore war crimes trials (1946–1948): interpreting arguments of the defence

  • W.L. Cheah (a1)

After the Second World War, the British military organised 131 war crimes trials in Singapore, which served as the base for British war crimes investigations in Asia. These trials brought together diverse participants-judges and counsel from the UK, India, and other Allied countries; accused persons from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan; defence counsel from Japan; and witnesses from all over Asia. The majority of defendants in these trials did not deny their involvement in the war crimes concerned; instead, these defendants argued that their conduct was consistent with Japanese norms, beliefs and practices. This article explores trial participants' varied and contested interpretations of the culturally influenced arguments put forward by the defence.

Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

N. Combs (2010) Fact-Finding without Facts: The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations in International Criminal Convictions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

J.M. Darley , K.M. Carlsmith and P.H. Robinson (2001) ‘The Ex Ante Function of the Criminal Law’, Law and Society Review 35(1): 165190.

E.J. Drea (1989) ‘In the Army Barracks of Imperial Japan’, Armed Forces & Society 15(3): 329348.

B.B. Jia (2013) ‘The Plea of Superior Orders in the Hong Kong Trials’ in Suzannah Linton (ed.) Hong Kong's War Crimes Trials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

T. Kelsall (2009) Culture under Cross-Examination: International Justice and the Special Court for Sierra Leone. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

A.W. Moore (2013) Writing War: Soldiers Record the Japanese Empire. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

E. Ohnuki-Tierney (1991) ‘The Emperor of Japan as Deity (Kami)’, Ethnology 30(3): 199–125.

M. Osiel (2000) ‘Why Prosecute? Critics of Punishment for Mass Atrocity’, Human Rights Quarterly 22(1): 118147.

A. Swidler (1986) ‘Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies’, American Sociological Review 51(2): 273286.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Law in Context
  • ISSN: 1744-5523
  • EISSN: 1744-5531
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-law-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 20 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 159 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 29th September 2016 - 21st August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.