Skip to main content Accessibility help

Legislating personhood: realising the right to support in exercising legal capacity

  • Eilionoir Flynn (a1) and Anna Arstein-Kerslake (a1)


This paper examines the regulation of ‘personhood’ through the granting or denying of legal capacity. It explores the development of the concept of personhood through the lens of moral and political philosophy. It highlights the problem of upholding cognition as a prerequisite for personhood or the granting of legal capacity because it results in the exclusion of people with cognitive disabilities (intellectual, psycho-social, mental disabilities, and others). The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) challenges this notion by guaranteeing respect for the right to legal capacity for people with disabilities on an equal basis with others and in all areas of life (Article 12). The paper uses the CRPD to argue for a conception of personhood that is divorced from cognition and a corresponding recognition of legal capacity as a universal attribute that all persons possess. Finally, a support model for the exercise of legal capacity is proposed as a possible alternative to the existing models of substituted decision-making that deny legal capacity and impose outside decision-makers.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Bach, Michael and Kerzner, Lana (2010) ‘A New Paradigm for Protecting Autonomy and the Right to Legal Capacity’, prepared for the Law Commission of Ontario (October 2010). Available at: <> (last accessed 10 February 2012)
Bartlett, Peter, Lewis, Oliver and Thorold, Oliver (2007) Mental Disability and the European Convention on Human Rights. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
Blackstone, W. (1979) Commentaries on the Laws of England: A Facsimile of the First Edition of 1765–1769 with an Introduction by Stanley N. Katz. London and Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
BOOTH GLEN, Kristin (2012) ‘Changing Paradigms: Mental Capacity, Legal Capacity, Guardianship, and Beyond’. Columbia Human Rights Law Review 44: 93.
College of Psychiatry of Ireland, Submission to the Joint Committee on Justice, Defence and Equality on the Proposed Capacity and Guardianship Legislation – Preliminary Submission Paper (Dublin: CPI, 2011).
Damasio, Antonio (2010) Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. New York: Pantheon Books.
Danermark, B. and Gellerstedt, L. C. (2004) ‘Social Justice: Redistribution and Recognition – A Non-reductionist Perspective on Disability’. Disability & Society 19: 339–53.
Dhanda, Amita (2006–2007) ‘Legal Capacity in the Disability Rights Convention: Stranglehold of the Past or Lodestar for the Future?Syracuse J. Int'l L. & Com. 34: 429.
Frankl, Viktor (1972) ‘Youth in Search of Meaning’, In Paper presented to Toronto Youth Corps (May 1972), online: <>.
Freeman, Marsha A. (1989–1990) ‘Measuring Equality: A Comparative Perspective on Women's Legal Capacity and Constitutional Rights in Five Commonwealth Countries’. Berkeley Women's L.J. 5: 110, 112.
Frolik, Lawrence A. (1981) ‘Plenary Guardianship: An Analysis, A Critique and a Proposal for Reform’. Arizona Law Review 23: 599, 604.
Gigerenzer, G. (2007) Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious. New York: Viking Publishers.
International Disability Alliance (2008) ‘Legal Opinion on Article 12 of the CRPD’ (21 June 2008) at 1. Available at <> (last accessed 13 October 2011)
Jaworska, Agnieszka. ‘Advance Directives and Substitute Decision-Making’, in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2009 edition). Available at: <>.
Jennings, B. (2010) ‘Agency and Moral Relationship in Dementia’, in Kittay, E. F. and Carlson, L. (eds), Cognitive Disability and its Challenge to Moral Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell Publishers, 179.
Jones, M. and Basser-Marks, L. A. (1998) ‘The Limitations on the Use of Law to Promote Rights: An Assessment of the Disability Discrimination Act 1992’, in Haurit, M., Sampford, C. and Blencowe, S. (eds), Justice for People with Disabilities – Legal and Institutional Issues.
Kittay, E. F. (1999) Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependence. New York: Routledge.
Kukathas, Chandran and Pettit, Philip (1990) Rawls: A Theory of Justice and its Critics. Stanford; CA: Stanford University Press.
Law Reform Commission (2006) Report: Vulnerable Adults and the Law. Dublin: Law Reform Commission.
Lehrer, Jonah (2009) How We Decide. New York: Houghton Miflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
Lewis, Oliver (2011) ‘Advancing Legal Capacity Jurisprudence’. European Human Rights Law Review 6: 700.
Locke, John (1988 [1689]) Two Treatises of Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McSherry, Bernadette (2012) ‘Legal Capacity Under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’. Journal of Law and Medicine 20: 2227.
Minkowitz, Tina (2006–2007) ‘The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Right to Be Free from Nonconsensual Psychiatric Interventions’. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 34: 405, 408.
Nussbaum, Martha (2006) Frontiers of Justice. Cambridge, MA and London: Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner of Human Rights (2005) Legal Capacity (Background Conference Document), 1, 13. Available at: <> (last accessed 13 October 2011).
Quinn, Gerard (2010) ‘Personhood and Legal Capacity: Perspectives on the Paradigm Shift of Article 12 CRPD,’ in Paper presented at Conference on Disability and Legal Capacity under the CRPD, Harvard Law School, Boston, 20 February 2010, available at: <> (last accessed 13 October 2011).
Quinn, Gerard (2011a) ‘Legal Capacity Law Reform: The Revolution of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disability’. Frontline 83, 26–27.
Quinn, Gerard (2011b) ‘Rethinking Personhood: New Directions in Legal Capacity Law & Policy’, Lecture, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 29 April 2011.
Quinn, Gerard and Arstein-Kerslake, Anna (2012) ‘Restoring the “Human” in “Human Rights” – Personhood and Doctrinal Innovation in the UN Disability Convention’, in Gearty, C. and Douzinas, C. (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Human Rights Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rawls, J. (1993) Political Liberalism. New York and Chichester: Columbia University Press, 21.
Rawls, John (1999) A Theory of Justice (rev. edin) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999) at xii.
Rehbinder, Manfred (1971) ‘Status, Contract, and the Welfare State’. Stanford Law Review 23: 941–55, 942.
Sen, Amartya (1999) Development as Freedom. New York: Random House.
Silvers, A., Wasserman, D. T. and Mahowald, M. B. (1998) Disability, Difference, Discrimination: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy, Vol. 94. Lanham; MD and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Stark, C. (2007) ‘How to Include the Severely Disabled in a Contractarian Theory of Justice’. Journal of Political Philosophy 15: 127.
Stein, M. S. (2006) Distributive Justice and Disability: Utilitarianism against Agalitarianism. Newhaven: Yale University Press.
The Law Reform Commission [Ireland] (2005) Consultation Paper on Vulnerable Adults and the Law: Capacity, pp. 147–57, online: <>.
Wong, S. I. (2010) ‘Duties of Justice to Citizens with Cognitive Disabilities’, in Kittay, E. F. and Carlson, L. (eds), Cognitive Disability and its Challenge to Moral Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell Publishers.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Law in Context
  • ISSN: 1744-5523
  • EISSN: 1744-5531
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-law-in-context
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed