Skip to main content Accessibility help

Reversing roles: bringing men into the frame

  • Sandra Fredman (a1)


The attempt to secure maternity rights has been a major focus of decades of campaigning for women's equality. However, it is of concern that maternity rights might reinforce women's responsibility for childcare. This paper considers how we bring men back into the frame, through a critical assessment of the contrasting approaches in Europe and the US to claims by fathers for parenting rights. It is argued that the goal of equal participation of women in the workplace needs to be matched by equal participation of men in the home. This is only possible if the conception of equality is shaped by a conscious and explicit commitment to the social value of parenthood. Substantive equality can only be genuinely furthered if pregnancy and parenthood are appropriately distinguished. Whereas pregnancy is unique and should be treated as such, a true application of substantive equality requires a ‘levelling up’ option, extending women's parenting rights to fathers.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Caracciolo di Torella, Eugenia (2007) ‘New Labour New Dads – the Impact of Family Friendly Legislation on Fathers’, Industrial Law Journal 36: 318328.
Caracciolo di Torella, Eugenia and Masselot, Annick (2009) Reconciling Work and Family Life in EU Law and Policy. London & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Council of the European Union (2010) ‘Press Release, 3053rd Council Meeting: Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs’, 17323/1/10 REV 1-PRESSE 331-PR CO 43, online: <>
EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) (2012a) ‘Written Testimony of Dr Stephen Benard, Professor of Sociology, Indiana University’, Meeting of February 15, 2012 – Unlawful Discrimination Against Pregnant Workers and Workers with Caregiving Responsibilities, online: <>.
EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) (2012b) ‘Written Testimony of Peggy Mastroianni Legal Counsel, EEOC’, Meeting of February 15, 2012 – Unlawful Discrimination Against Pregnant Workers and Workers with Caregiving Responsibilities, online: <>.
Equal Opportunities Commission (2005) ‘Greater Expectations: Summary Final Report: EOC's Investigation into Pregnancy Discrimination’, online: <>.
European Parliament (2009) ‘Report on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Council Directive 92/85/EEC on the Introduction of Measures to Encourage Improvements in the Safety and Health at Work of Pregnant Workers and Workers Who Have Recently Given Birth or Are Breastfeeding’ (COM(2008)0637 – C6-0340/2008 – 2008/0193(COD))’ A6-0267/2009), online: <>.
European Parliament (2012) ‘Parliamentary Questions 20 June 2012: Questions for Written Answer to the Council Rule 117 Angelika Werthmann (NI) Subject Maternity Leave in Europe’, online: <>.
Fredman, Sandra (1994) ‘A Difference with Distinction: Pregnancy and Parenthood Reassessed’, Law Quarterly Review 110: 106123.
Fredman, Sandra (1997) Women and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ILO (International Labour Organisation) (2013) ‘Maternity Protection’, online: <>.
James, Grace (2009) The Legal Regulation of Pregnancy and Parenting in the Labour Market. London: Routledge.
James, Grace (2013) ‘Forgotten Children: Work–Family Reconciliation in the EU’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 34: 363379.
Kossek, Ellen, Lewis, Suzan and Hammer, Leslie (2010) ‘Work Family Initiatives and Organisation Change: Mixed Messages in Moving from the mmargins to the Mainstream’, Human Relations 63: 319.
Lewis, Jane, Knijn, Trudie, Martin, Claude and Ostner, Ilona (2008) ‘Patterns of Development in Work/Family Reconciliation Policies for Parents in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK in the 2000s’, Social Politics 15: 261286.
Perez-Vaisvidovsky, Nadav (2013) ‘Fathers at a Crossroads: The Combined Effect of Organizational and Cultural Factors on the Making of Gender-Related Policy’, Social Politics 20: 407429.
Smith, Peggie R. (2001–2002) ‘Parental Status in Employment Discrimination: A Wrong in Need of a Right?’, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 35: 569620.
Suk, Julie (2012) ‘Antidiscrimination to Equality: Stereotypes and the Life Cycle in the United States and Europe’, American Journal of Comparative Law 75: 7799.


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed