Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T06:04:43.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tensions between norms of everyday narrating and legal narrating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2022

Colette Daiute Open the ORCID record for Colette Daiute [Opens in a new window]  and
Flora Di Donato
Colette Daiute*
Affiliation:
Graduate Center, City University of New York, USA
Flora Di Donato
Affiliation:
Philosophy of Law and Clinical Legal Training, Department of Law, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: cdaiute@gc.cuny.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Contemporary asylum laws challenge the narratives of migrants and legal professional teams. Struggles arise in requirements to tell the right story defined by legal norms while storytelling in everyday life relies on sociocultural norms. Professionals working with socially and legally vulnerable populations, as in education and asylum cases, can bridge that gap if we understand narrating as a relational process with credibility and coherence developing over time in terms of the clients’ experience and institutional expectations. This paper presents dynamic storytelling methodology to guide such a process, applied successfully with a Roma community seeking inclusion in public education and used to interpret two unsuccessful asylum cases. Drawing on those examples, we conclude by proposing a socio-legal framework for collaborative lawyering in research on clinical legal training. The goal is a narrative process based on legal actors’ awareness that truth acquisition is a human sense-making process framed by human rights norms.

Keywords

migration laweducation policynarrativecollaborative lawyeringpower relations
Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 2023 , pp. 177 - 196
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfieri, A (1990–1991) Reconstructive poverty law practice: learning lessons of client narrative. Yale Law Journal 100, 2107–2147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfieri, A (2016) Rebellious pedagogy and practice. Clinical Law Review 23, 5–36.Google Scholar
Amsterdam, AG and Bruner, JS (2000) Minding the Law: How Courts Rely on Storytelling, and How Their Stories Change the Way We Understand the Law – and Ourselves. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, MM (1986) The problem of speech genres. In Emerson, C and Holquist, M (eds), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 60–102.Google Scholar
Barsky, RF (1994) Constructing the Productive Other. IGRC Montreal, Canada: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, FS (ed.) (2011) The Global Clinical Movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, JS (2003) Making Stories: Law, Literature, and Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Coffey, G (2003) The credibility of credibility evidence at the refugee review tribunal. International Journal of Refugee Law 15, 377–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daiute, C (2013) Narrative Inquiry: A Dynamic Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Daiute, C (2008) The rights of children, the rights of nations: developmental theory and the politics of children's rights. Journal of Social Issues 64, 701–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daiute, C and Di Donato, F (2022) Tensions between (Social and Legal) Vulnerability and Participation to Support Young War Refugees, invited keynote at the Catholic University, ‘Our Lady of Good Counsel’, European Center of Peace Science, Integration and Cooperation (CESPIC), Tirana Albania, 20 April 2022.Google Scholar
Daiute, C and Kovacs-Cerovic, T (2017) Minority Teachers – Roma in Serbia – Narrate Education Reform. Belgrade: Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy at the University of Belgrade and the Association of Pedagogical Assistants.Google Scholar
Daiute, C and Nelson, KA (1997) Making sense of the sense-making function of narrative evaluation. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7, 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Halluin, E (2016) Le nouveau paradigme des ‘populations vulnérables’ dans les politiques Européennes d'Asile. Savoir/Agir 2, 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di, Donato F (2020a) New forms of collaborative lawyering and story construction in the field of international protection: cases of victims of human trafficking. Migration Letters 17, 299–307.Google Scholar
Di, Donato F (2020b) The Analysis of Legal Cases: A Narrative Approach. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Di, Donato F (2021) Lay lawyering: pour une pédagogie clinique fondée sur la participation active des personnes juridiquement vulnérables. Cliniques juridiques 5, 1–21. Available at: https://www.cliniques-juridiques.org/juridiques.org/?p=816 (accessed 17 October 2022).Google Scholar
Di, Donato F (2022) A clinical narrative approach to support asylum seekers in international protection procedures. Available at: http://www.giurisprudenza.unina.it/documents/18034198/29625303/appclin.pdf/bb0110bf-dbab-43ca-a9ae-f954c135f14c (accessed 17 October 2022).Google Scholar
Fineman, MA (2008–2009) The vulnerable subject: anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 20, 9.Google Scholar
Fuller, LL (1969) Human interaction and the law. American Journal of Jurisprudence 14, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galowitz, P (2012) The opportunities and challenges of an interdisciplinary clinic. International Journal of Clinical Legal Education 18, 163–178.Google Scholar
Lee, CD (2003) Toward a framework for culturally responsive design in multimedia computer environments: cultural modeling as a case. Mind, Culture, and Activity 10, 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthouse Reports (2016) A Decisive Conversation (adapted for interactive digital narrative). Amsterdam: Lighthouse Reports. Available at: https://www.lighthousereports.nl (accessed 17 October 2022).Google Scholar
López, GP (1984) Lay lawyering. UCLA Law Review 32, 1–60.Google Scholar
López, GP (1992) Rebellious Lawyering: One Chicano's Vision of Progressive Law Practice. San Francisco: Westview Press.Google Scholar
López, GP (2005) Shaping community problem solving around community knowledge. New York University Law Review 79, 59–114.Google Scholar
López, GP (2017) Transform – don't just tinker with – legal education. Clinical Law Review 23, 471– 576.Google Scholar
Nelken, D (ed.) (2012) Using Legal Culture. London: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing.Google Scholar
Nelson, K (2003) Narrative and self, myth and memory: emergence of the cultural self. In Fivush, R and Haden, C (eds), The Development of Autobiographical Memory: Memory and Self-understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 3–28.Google Scholar
Piomelli, A (2016) Rebellious heroes. Clinical Law Review 23, 283–310.Google Scholar
Sherwin, R and Wagner, A (2012) Law, Culture & Visual Studies, Vol. 1–2. New York/London: Springer.Google Scholar
Zulack, MM (1994–1995) Rediscovering client decision-making: the impact of role-playing. Clinical Law Review 1, 593–638.Google Scholar