Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Three phases of courts’ publicity: reconfiguring Bentham's open justice in the twenty-first century

  • Jane Johnston (a1)

Abstract

The paper examines the changing nature of publicity in the courts, tracing three distinct but interconnected phases of publicity using Jeremy Bentham's theory of open justice and publicity as a framework. The first phase is press coverage, with the news media chronicling the justice system for the general population, most recently including televised court proceedings. The second is the appointment of Courts Information Officers, occurring as early as the 1930s and growing in impact since the 1990s, established to facilitate the relationship between courts and the news media. The third and final phase is the Internet, including social media, resulting in changes to news media models and driving contemporary practices of court-generated media. The paper concludes that, while media and communication practices have changed radically since the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and the concept of publicity has shifted, Bentham's approach to open justice remains salient for twenty-first-century courts’ communication.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Three phases of courts’ publicity: reconfiguring Bentham's open justice in the twenty-first century
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Three phases of courts’ publicity: reconfiguring Bentham's open justice in the twenty-first century
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Three phases of courts’ publicity: reconfiguring Bentham's open justice in the twenty-first century
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. E-mail: jane.johnston@uq.edu.au.

References

Hide All
Alemanno, A and Stefan, O (2014) Openness at the court of Justice of the European Union: toppling a taboo. Common Market Law Review 51, 97140.
Anderson, PJ and Ward, G (2007) The Future of Journalism in the Advanced Democracies. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
Bentham, J (1791) Panopticon; or the Inspection House. London: T Payne.
Bentham, J (1843a) An essay on political tactics. In Bowring, J (ed.), Works of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. 2. Edinburgh: William Tait, pp. 310316. Available at http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/bentham-the-works-of-jeremy-bentham-vol-2 (accessed 21 July 2018).
Bentham, J (1843b) Works of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. 4. Edinburgh: William Tait, pp. 305407. Available at https://books.google.com.au/books?id=QdEQAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed 15 September 2017).
Bourke, JF (2007) The role of Australian courts as alternative media. In Chitty, N and Rattikalchalakorn, S (eds), Alternative Media: Idealism and Pragmatism. Penang: Southbound Press, pp. 5162.
Brennan, G (1997) The Third Branch and the Fourth Estate, paper presented at the Broadcasting, Society and the Law, University College of Dublin, 22 April 1997. Available at http://www.hcourt.gov.au/publications/speeches/former/speeches-by-the-hon-sir-gerard-brennan (accessed 21 July 2018).
Brooks, P (2006) Narrative transactions – does the law need a narratology? Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 18, 128.
Canadian Centre for Court Technology (2013) Canada-Wide Summary of Court Policies on Live Text-Based Communications from the Courtroom. Available at http://www.adidem.org/images/e/e4/Policies-on-Live-Text-Based-Communications-June-2013.pdf (access 1 October 2017).
Casey, RD (1939) The National Publicity Bureau and British Party Propaganda. Public Opinion Quarterly 3, 623634.
Chibnall, S (1977) Law-and-Order News. London: Tavistock.
Cohn, M and Dow, D (1998) Cameras in the Courtroom: Television and the Pursuit of Justice. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.
Davey, C et al. (2010) New Media and the Courts: The Current Status and a Look at the Future, Conference of Court Public Information Officers 19th annual meeting, Atlanta, Georgia, 26 August 2010. Available at http://ccpio.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/2010-ccpio-report-summary.pdf (accessed 28 September 2017).
Davey, C et al. (2014) CCPIO New Media Survey: A Report of the Conference of Court Public Information Officers, Conference of Court Public Information Officers 23rd annual meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada, 6 August 2014. Available at http://ccpio.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/CCPIO-New-Media-survey-report_2014.pdf (accessed 28 September 2017).
Davis, R (1994) Decisions and Images: The Supreme Court and the Press. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Deuze, M (2012a) Deuzeblog: Media Life. Available at http://deuze.blogspot.com.au/2011/10/media-life-2012-preface.html?view=magazine (accessed 10 June 2017).
Deuze, M (2012b) Media Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Dietrich, G (2014) Spin Sucks: Communication and Reputation Management in the Digital Age. Indianapolis, IN: Pearson Education.
Doyle, A (2011) Revisiting the synopticon: reconsidering Mathiesen's ‘The Viewer Society’ in the age of Web 2.0. Theoretical Criminology 15, 283299.
Drechsel, R (1983) News Making in the Trial Courts. New York: Longman.
Elder, R (2016) 99% of young British people use social media every week, Business Insider, 5 August. Available at http://www.businessinsider.com/99-of-young-british-people-use-social-media-every-week-2016-8/?r = AU&IR (accessed 26 September 2017).
Ericson, R, Baranek, P and Chan, J (1989) Negotiating Control: A Study of News Sources. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Fife-Yeomans, J (1995) Fear and loathing: the courts and the media. Journal of Judicial Administration 5, 3942.
Foucault, M (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.
Galtung, J and Ruge, MH (1965) The structure of foreign news: the presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research 2, 6490.
Ginsburg, RB (1995) Communicating and commenting on the court's work. The Georgetown Law Journal 83, 21192129.
Gleason, T (2015) If we are all journalists can journalistic privilege survive? Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture 22, 357386.
Gosseries, A and Parr, T (2017) Publicity. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/publicity (accessed 16 September 2017).
Greenslade, R (2016) New studies suggest continuing decrease in court reporting, The Guardian, 29 October. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2016/oct/28/new-studies-suggest-continuing-decrease-in-court-reporting (accessed 25 September 2017).
Grunig, JE and Hunt, T (1984) Managing Public Relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Habermas, J (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Harcup, T and O'Neill, D (2016) What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited (again). Journalism Studies 18, 14701488.
Jackson, M and Shelly, M (2015/16) The use of Twitter by Australian courts. Journal of Law Information and Science 24, 83100.
Johnston, J (2005) Communicating courts: a decade of practice in the third arm of government. Australian Journal of Communication 32, 7793.
Johnston, J (2008) The court–media interface: bridging the divide. Australian Journalism Review 30, 2739.
Johnston, J (2012) Courts new visibility 2.0. In Keyzer, P, Johnston, J and Pearson, M (eds), Courts and the Media in the Digital Age. Sydney: Halstead Press, pp. 4154.
Johnston, J (2016) Public Relations and the Public Interest. New York: Routledge.
Johnston, J (2017a) Courts use of social media: a community of practice model. International Journal of Communication 11, 669683.
Johnston, J (2017b) Review of the Court Information Officer Position. Brisbane: Queensland Supreme and District Courts (unpublished report).
Johnston, J and Breit, R (2010) Towards a narratology of court reporting, Media International Australia 137, 4757.
Johnston, J and Wallace, A (2017) Who is a journalist? Changing legal definitions in a de-territorialised media space. Digital Journalism 5, 850857.
Judge, Lord (2011) Practice Guidance: The Use of Live Text-Based Forms of Communication (including Twitter) from Court for the Purposes of Fair and Accurate Reporting, The Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, 14 December. Available at http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Guidance/ltbc-guidance-dec-2011.pdf (accessed 1 July 2016).
Keyzer, P (1999) What the courts and the media can do to improve the standard of media reporting of the work of the courts. In Keyzer, P (ed.), The Courts and the Media. Rushcutters Bay, NSW: Halstead Press, pp. 150158.
Keyzer, P et al. (2013) The courts and social media: what do judges and court workers think? Judicial Officers’ Bulletin 25, 4551.
L'Etang, J (2004) Public Relations in Britain. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
LaRowe, N and Hoekstra, V (2014) On and off the Supreme Court beat: differences in newspaper coverage of the Supreme Court and the implications for public support. In Davis, R (ed.), Covering the United States Supreme Court in the Digital Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 126152.
Laursen, B and Valentini, C (2015) Mediatization and government communication: press work in the European Parliament. The International Journal of Press/Politics 20, 2644.
Lee, M and McGovern, A (2013) Force to sell: policing the image and manufacturing public confidence. Policing and Society 23, 103124.
Linton, JM and Gerace, M (1990) The reel world of the courtroom: an analysis of a television documentary about a murder trial. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 10, 127150.
Luban, D (1998) The publicity principle. In Goodin, RE (ed.), The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 154198.
Ma, G (2014) The Use of Information Technology and Text-Based Communications in Courtrooms, Practice Direction no. 32, Hong Kong. Available at http://legalref.judiciary.gov.hk/doc/npd/eng/PD32.htm (accessed 1 October 2017).
Mathiesen, T (1997) The viewer society: Michel Foucault's ‘panopticon’ revisited. Theoretical Criminology 1, 215234.
McGarvie, RE (1992) The ways available to the judicial arm of government to preserve judicial independence. Journal of Judicial Administration 1, 236280.
McLachlan, B (2003) Courts, transparency and public confidence – to the better administration of justice. Deakin Law Review 8. Available at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/DeakinLawRw/2003/1.html (accessed 26 September 2017).
Meyer, N (2014) Social media and the courts: innovative tools or dangerous fad? A practical guide for court administrators. International Journal for Court Administration 6, 127.
Moran, LJ (2014a) Managing the ‘critical interdependencies’ of the media and the judiciary in the United Kingdom. In Asimow, M, Brown, K and Papke, DR (eds), Law and Popular Culture: International Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 194215.
Moran, LJ (2014b) Managing the news image of the judiciary: the role of judicial press officers. Oñati Socio-legal Series [online] 4, 799818. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2506601 (accessed 20 September 2017).
Moran, LJ (2016) Visible justice: YouTube and the UK Supreme Court. Annual Review of Interdisciplinary Justice Research 5, 223263.
Newland, CA (1964) Press coverage of the United States Supreme Court. The Western Political Quarterly 17, 1536.
Parker, S (1998) Courts and the Public. Melbourne: Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration.
Peleg, A and Bogoch, B (2014) Silence is no longer golden: media, public relations and the judiciary in Israel. Oñati Socio-legal Series [online] 4, 819835. Available at http://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/viewFile/332/474 (accessed 21 July 2018).
Peters, J and Tandoc, EC (2013) ‘People who aren't really reporters at all, who have no professional qualifications’: defining a journalist and deciding who may claim privileges. NYU Journal of Legislation and Public Policy Quorum 34, 3463.
Pew Research Center (2017) Social Media Fact Sheet. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/ (accessed 27 September 2015).
Postema, GJ (2014) The soul of justice: Bentham on publicity, law and the rule of law. In Zhai, X and Quinn, M (eds), Bentham's Theory of Law & Public Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 4062.
Resnik, J (2013) The democracy in courts: Jeremy Bentham, ‘publicity’, and the privatization of process in the twenty-first century. No Foundations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Law & Justice 10, 77119.
Rodrick, S (2014) Achieving the aims of open justice? The relationship between the courts, the media and the public. Deakin Law Review 19, 123162.
Rowbotham, J, Stevenson, K and Pegg, S (2013) Crime News in Modern Britain: Press Reporting and Responsibility, 1820–2010. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Schultz, J (1994) Not Just Another Business: Journalists, Citizens and the Media. Sydney: Pluto Press.
Sensis (2017) The Must-Know Stats from the 2017 Sensis Social Media Report. Available from https://www.sensis.com.au/about/our-reports/sensis-social-media-report (accessed 26 September 2017).
Siebert, FS, Peterson, T and Schramm, W (1956) Four Theories of the Press. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Slayton, DW (2011) Social media: a new way to communicate that can no longer be ignored. In National Center for State Courts (ed.), Future Trends for State Courts, p. 34. Available at http://www.ncsc.org/~/media/Microsites/Files/Future%20Trends/Author%20PDFs/Slayton.ashx (accessed 3 October 2017).
Spigelman, J (2006) The principle of open justice: a comparative perspective. University of New South Wales Law Journal 29, 147166. Available at http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLawJl/2006/19.html (accessed 28 September 2017).
Stack, R (1998) Courts, Counselors and Correspondents. Littleton, CO: Rothman & Co.
Stepniak, D (1998) Electronic Media Coverage of Courts: Report Prepared for the Federal Court of Australia. Melbourne: Commonwealth of Australia.
Stoker, K and Rawlins, BL (2005) The ‘light’ of publicity in the progressive era. Journalism History 30, 177188.
Strömbäck, J (2008) Four phases of mediatization: an analysis of the mediatization of politics. International Journal of Press/Politics 13, 228246.
Supreme Court of Queensland (2016) Electronic Publication of Court Proceedings. April, Brisbane. Available at https://media.sclqld.org.au/documents/news/Electronic-Publication-of-Court-Proceedings.pdf (accessed 21 July 2018).
Supreme Judicial Court Rule (2012) Supreme Judicial Court Rule 1:19: Electronic Access to the Courts, Massachusetts Courts System. Available at http://www.mass.gov/courts/case-legal-res/rules-of-court/sjc/sjc119.html (accessed 20 September 2017).
Thompson, J (2005) The new visibility theory. Culture and Society 22, 3151.
Verčič, D and Verčič, AT (2016) The new publicity: from reflexive to reflective mediatisation. Public Relations Review 42, 493498.
Wallace, A and Johnston, J (2015) Tweeting from court: new guidelines for modern media. Media Arts Law Review 20, 1532.
We Are Social (2017) Digital in 2017: global overview. Available at https://wearesocial.com/specialreports/digital-in-2017-global-overview (accessed 17 January 2018).
West, SR (2014) Press exceptionalism. Harvard Law Review 27, 24342462.
Williams, D (1994) Who Speaks for the Courts, speech at the National Conference on Courts in a Representative Democracy conference, AIJA, Canberra, 13 November.
Zefass, A, Verčič, D and Wiesenberg, M (2016) The dawn of a new golden age for media relations? How PR professionals interact with the mass media and use new collaboration practices. Public Relations Review 42, 499508.

Keywords

Three phases of courts’ publicity: reconfiguring Bentham's open justice in the twenty-first century

  • Jane Johnston (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed