Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:53:56.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Operation RUBICON: An Assessment With Regard to Switzerland's Duties Under the Law of Neutrality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2023

Abstract

Under the guise of Swiss neutrality, the Swiss-based company Crypto AG for decades manufactured and supplied manipulated cipher machines to governments in over 120 States. The company was controlled by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the German Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND). The Swiss intelligence services had known about this intelligence operation since 1993 at the latest, had access to relevant information, and allowed the foreign intelligence services to continue their operation until 2018. For the permanently neutral State of Switzerland, this raises the question of how Operation RUBICON is to be assessed with regard to Switzerland's duties under the law of neutrality.

This author finds that it was unlikely that Switzerland, in its complicity in Operation RUBICON, violated its duties under the law of neutrality. However, if—and this is unlikely but cannot be completely ruled out—Crypto AG exported rigged cipher machines or offered maintenance services during (or immediately before) the Kosovo War in 1999 to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, or during (or immediately before) the Iraq invasion in 2003 to the Republic of Iraq, Switzerland would have violated its duties under the law of neutrality. At the very least, Switzerland's complicity in Operation RUBICON plays into its image as a Western neutral and is therefore relevant in terms of Swiss neutrality policy. In any case, it is crucial for Switzerland to refrain from complying with intelligence operations such as Operation RUBICON and to preserve (guided by equidistance, international law, and Switzerland's humanitarian tradition) its permanent neutrality, even during today's challenging circumstances.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by International Association of Law Libraries

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Manuel Rodriguez is a Legal Officer at the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (FDFA), Altstetterstrasse 273, 8047 Zurich. E-mail: manuel.cm.rodriguez@gmail.com

1

The author is expressing a personal point of view here. The opinions stated in this text should not be regarded as the official position of Switzerland or of the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs.

References

Bibliography

Barz, Andreas. Der Mythos Neutralität: Zu den Wechselwirkungen zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit eines politischen Konzepts. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus-Verlagsgesellschaft, 1992.Google Scholar
Bothe, Michael. “Neutrality, concept and general rules,” in The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, ed. by Peters, Anne (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021) (2015).Google Scholar
Calmy-Rey, Micheline. Die Neutralität: Zwischen Mythos und Vorbild. Basel: NZZ Libro, Schwabe Verlagsgruppe, 2020.Google Scholar
Castrén, Erik. The Present Law of War and Neutrality. Helsinki: Finnish Academy of Science and Letters, 1954.Google Scholar
Crypto Museum. “Glossary of crypto terminology.” (February 27, 2022), accessed March 18, 2022, https://www.cryptomuseum.com/crypto/glossary.htm.Google Scholar
Crypto Museum. “Operation Rubicon.” (December 12, 2019), accessed April 25, 2021, https://www.cryptomuseum.com/intel/cia/rubicon.htm.Google Scholar
Deák, Francis. “Neutrality revisited,” in Transnational Law in a Changing Society: Essays in Honour of Philip C. Jessup, ed. by Friedmann, Wolfgang, Henkin, Louis, Lissitzyin, Oliver James, and Jessup, Philip C. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1972), 137154.Google Scholar
Diggelmann, Oliver. “Wie könnte die Schweizer Neutralität im 21. Jahrhundert aussehen.” Neue Züricher Zeitung (NZZ), May 7, 2022, https://www.nzz.ch/schweiz/wie-koennte-die-schweizer-neutralitaet-im-21-jahrhundert-aussehen-ld.1682343.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram. War, Aggression and Self-Defense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dürst, Daniel. Schweizerische Neutralität und Kriegsmaterialausfuhr .” Diss., University of Zurich, 1983.Google Scholar
Egli, Patricia. “Aktuelle Leitsätze zur Neutralität.Jusletter 21, (2006).Google Scholar
Endres, Fiona, and Vögele, Nicole. “Geheimdienstaffaire Cryptoleaks: Weltweite Spionage- Operation mit Schweizer Firma aufgedeckt.” Schweizer Radio und Fernsehen (SRF), February 11, 2020, https://www.srf.ch/news/schweiz/geheimdienstaffaere-cryptoleaks-weltweite-spionage-operation-mit-schweizer-firma-aufgedeckt.Google Scholar
[Endres, Fiona, and Vögele, Nicole]. “Weltpolitik mit manipulierten Chiffriergeräten.” Schweizer Radio und Fernsehen (SRF), February 12, 2020, https://www.srf.ch/news/international/geheimdienst-affaere-weltpolitik-mit-manipulierten-chiffriergeraeten.Google Scholar
Fauchille, Paul. Traité de droit international public. vol. 2, Paris: Rousseau et Cie, 1921.Google Scholar
Gafafer, Tobias. “Für Russland ist die Schweiz nicht mehr neutral – der Bundesrat sucht in der Krise seine Rolle.” Neue Züricher Zeitung (NZZ), April 8, 2022, https://www.nzz.ch/schweiz/fuer-russland-ist-die-schweiz-nicht-mehr-neutral-der-bundesrat-sucht-in-der-krise-seine-rolle-ld.1678456.Google Scholar
Graf Vitzthum, Wolfgang, and Proelß, Alexander. Völkerrecht. 8th ed., Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gyger, Walter B. Schweizerische Neutralität in Vergangenheit, Gegenwart und Zukunft. Zurich: Schweizerischer Aufklärungs-Dienst, 1974.Google Scholar
Haug, Hans. Neutralität und Völkergemeinschaft. Zurich: Polygraphischer Verlag, 1962.Google Scholar
Hostettler, Peter, and Danai, Olivia. “Neutrality in Land Warfare,” in The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, ed. by Peters, Anne (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021) (2015).Google Scholar
Hussmann, Markus. “Art 272,” in Basler Kommentar: Strafrecht II, 4th ed., ed. by Niggli, Marcel A. and Wiprächtiger, Hans (Basel: Helbing Lichtenhahn, 2019), 49754989.Google Scholar
Interpellation 20.4456. Jahrzehntelanger Bruch des Neutralitätsrechts durch den Nachrichtendienst: Konsequenzen und Risiken für die Schweiz, accessed April 10, 2022, https://www.parlament.ch/de/ratsbetrieb/suche-curia-vista/geschaeft?AffairId=20204456.Google Scholar
Köpfer, Josef. Die Neutralität im Wandel der Erscheinungsformen militärischer Auseinandersetzungen. Munich: Bernard & Graefe Verlag, 1975.Google Scholar
Künzli, Jörg. Vom Umgang des Rechtsstaats mit Unrechtsregimes: Völker- und landesrechtliche Grenzen des Verhaltensspielraums der schweizerischen Aussenpolitik gegenüber Völkerrecht missachtenden Staaten. Bern: Stämpfli, 2008.Google Scholar
Kurz, Hans-Rudolf. Bewaffnete Neutralität: Die militärische Bedeutung der dauernden schweizerischen Neutralität. Frauenfeld/Stuttgart: Huber, 1967.Google Scholar
Landwehr, Dominik. “Die Crypto-AG: Ein Spionage-Thriller aus dem Kalten Krieg.” Swissinfo, December 15, 2020, https://www.swissinfo.ch/ger/crypto-ag-schweiz-usa-spionage-kryptografie-kalter-krieg_die-crypto-ag--ein-spionage-thriller-aus-dem-kalten-krieg/46216566.Google Scholar
Miller, Greg. “The intelligence coup of the century: For decades, the CIA read the encrypted communications of allies and adversaries.” Washington Post, February 11, 2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/world/national-security/cia-crypto-encryption-machines-espionage/.Google Scholar
MINERVA: A history. Internal CIA publication TOP SECRET (2004), quoted in Greg Miller, “The intelligence coup of the century: For decades, the CIA read the encrypted communications of allies and adversaries.” Washington Post, February 11, 2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/world/national-security/cia-crypto-encryption-machines-espionage/.Google Scholar
MINERVA: A history. Internal CIA publication TOP SECRET (2004), quoted in Res Strehle, Operation Crypto: Die Schweiz im Dienst von CIA und BND. Basel: Echtzeit, 2020.Google Scholar
MINERVA: A history. Internal CIA publication TOP SECRET (2004), quoted in [Fiona Endres and Nicole Vögele], “Weltpolitik mit manipulierten Chiffriergeräten,” Schweizer Radio und Fernsehen (SRF), February 12, 2020, https://www.srf.ch/news/international/geheimdienst-affaere-weltpolitik-mit-manipulierten-chiffriergeraeten.Google Scholar
Neuhaus, Christina. “Ist Neutralität mit Haltung neutral?” Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ), March 4, 2022, https://www.nzz.ch/meinung/neutralitaet-im-ukraine-krieg-wo-genau-steht-die-schweiz-ld.1672971.Google Scholar
Oeter, Stefan. Neutralität und Waffenhandel. Berlin: Springer, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omlin, Esther. “Art 301,” in Basler Kommentar: Strafrecht II. 4th ed., ed. by Niggli, Marcel A. and Wiprächtiger, Hans (Basel: Helbing Lichtenhahn, 2019), 52595265.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lassa. International Law: A Treatise. 7th ed. vol. 2, ed. by Lauterpacht, Hersch (London: Longmans, 1952).Google Scholar
Pieper, Ulrike. Neutralität von Staaten. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang, 1997.Google Scholar
Politakis, George. “Variations on a myth: Neutrality and arms trade.” German Yearbook of International Law 35 (1992): 435506.Google Scholar
Report of the Control Delegation (CDel). Fall Crypto AG, November 2, 2020, https://www.parlament.ch/centers/documents/de/bericht-gpdel-2020-11-10-d.pdf.Google Scholar
Report of the interdepartmental working group. Neutralitätspraxis der Schweiz: Aktuelle Aspekte, August 30, 2000, https://www.eda.admin.ch/dam/eda/de/documents/aussenpolitik/voelkerrecht/BerichtNeutralitaetspraxis_Kosovo.2000.de.pdf.Google Scholar
Roeser, Thomas. Völkerrechtliche Aspekte des internationalen Handels mit konventionellen Waffen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotter, Manfred. Die dauernde Neutralität. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1981.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco. “Der Fall Crypto AG und die schweizerische Neutralität.” Expert Opinion, University of Geneva, February 23, 2021.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco. “Die Schweizerische Neutralitat und der Fall Crypto AG.Swiss Review of International and European Law 31(4) (2021): 523540.Google Scholar
Schaub, Adrian R. “Aktuelle Aspekte der Neutralität.” Schweizerische Zeitschrift für internationales und europäisches Recht 3 (1996): 353371.Google Scholar
Schaub, Adrian R. Neutralität und kollektive Sicherheit: Gegenüberstellung zweier unvereinbarer Verhaltenskonzepte in bewaffneten Konflikten und Thesen zu einem zeit- und völkerrechtsgemässen modus vivendi. Basel/Frankfurt a.M.: Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 1995.Google Scholar
Scheuner, Ulrich. Die Neutralität im heutigen Völkerrecht. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, Michael. Dauernde Neutralität und Europäische Integration. Wien: Springer, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweizer, Paul. Geschichte der Schweizerischen Neutralität. Frauenfeld: Huber, 1895.Google Scholar
Seger, Paul. “The Law of Neutrality,” in The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Armed Conflict, ed. by Clapham, Andrew and Gaeta, Paola (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 248270.Google Scholar
Spitteler, Carl. “Unser Schweizer Standpunkt.” (December 14, 1914), Zeit-Fragen, accessed May 13, 2022, https://www.zeit-fragen.ch/index.php?id=155.Google Scholar
Spring, Alexander. The International Law Concept of Neutrality in the 21st Century: An Analysis of Contemporary Neutrality with a Focus on Switzerland. Zurich/St. Gallen: Dike, 2014.Google Scholar
Stadlemeier, Sigmar. Dynamische Interpretation der dauernden Neutralität. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statement of the Federal Council. Fall Crypto AG: Bericht der Geschäftsprüfungsdelegation der eidgenössischen Räte vom 2. November 2020, May 26, 2021, https://www.parlament.ch/centers/documents/de/Stellungnahme-des-Bundesrates-vom-26-05-2021.pdf.Google Scholar
Strehle, Res. Operation Crypto: Die Schweiz im Dienst von CIA und BND. Basel: Echtzeit, 2020.Google Scholar
Strupp, Karl. Neutralisation, Befriedung, Entmilitarisierung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1933.Google Scholar
Stürchler, Nikolas. “Der Begriff des Krieges im Völkerrecht: Spezifisch unter dem Gesichtspunkt des Neutralitätsrechts.Schweizerische Zeitschrift für internationalen und europäisches Recht 21(4) (2011): 627645.Google Scholar
Swiss Federal Council. Aussenpolitischer Bericht 2011 (12.014), January 18, 2012, https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/fga/2012/405/de.Google Scholar
Swiss Federal Council. Bericht des Bundesrates an die Bundesversammlung über die Sicherheitspolitik der Schweiz (10.059), June 23, 2010, https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/fga/2010/876/de.Google Scholar
Swiss Federal Council. “Bericht zur Neutralität,” Anhang zum Bericht über die Aussenpolitik der Schweiz in den 90er Jahren (93.098), November 29, 1993, https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/fga/1994/1_153__/de.Google Scholar
Swiss Federal Council. Botschaft zur Volksinitiative «Gegen Waffenexporte in Bürgerkriegsländer (Korrektur-Initiative)» und zum indirekten Gegenvorschlag (Änderung des Kriegsmaterialgesetzes (21.021), March 5, 2021, https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/fga/2021/623/de.Google Scholar
Swiss Federal Council. Die Neutralität auf dem Prüfstand im Irak-Konflikt: Zusammenfassung der Neutralitätspraxis der Schweiz während des Irak-Konflikts in Erfüllung des Postulats Reimann (03.3066) und der Motion der SVP Fraktion (03.3050), December 2, 2005, https://www.dfae.admin.ch/dam/eda/de/documents/aussenpolitik/voelkerrecht/NeutralitaetspraxisSchweiz.Irak-Konflikt.de.pdf.Google Scholar
Swiss Federal Council. “Neutralität,” Anhang 1 zum aussenpolitischen Bericht 2007, June 2007, https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/fga/2007/769/de.Google Scholar
Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (FDFA). Die Neutralität der Schweiz, 2022, https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/de/home/aussenpolitik/voelkerrecht/neutralitaet.html.Google Scholar
Swiss Parliament. “Control Delegation CD,” accessed May 24, 2021, https://www.parlament.ch/en/organe/delegations/control-delegation.Google Scholar
Terry, Patrick C. R.The Riddle of the Sands – Peacetime espionage and public international law.Georgetown Journal of International Law 51(2) (2020): 377414.Google Scholar
Thevessen, Elmar, Müller, Peter F., and Stoll, Ulrich. “Operation Rubikon: #Cryptoleaks: Wie BND und CIA alle täuschten.” Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen (ZDF), February 11, 2020, https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/politik/cryptoleaks-bnd-cia-operation-rubikon-100.html.Google Scholar
Tinoco, Arnoldo. Völkerrechtliche Grundlagen dauernder Neutralität: Die dauernde aktive und demilitarisierte Neutralität Costa Ricas unter der Satzung der Vereinten Nationen. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1989.Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert W. The Law of War and Neutrality at Sea. Washington D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, 1955.Google Scholar
United Nations, “Falkland Islands (Malvinas).” (May 15, 2019), accessed May 16, 2021, https://www.un.org/dppa/decolonization/en/nsgt/falkland-islands-malvinas.Google Scholar
Upcher, James. Neutrality in Contemporary International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Verlinden, Nele. “The Law of Neutrality,” in Armed Conflicts and the Law, ed. by Wouters, Jan, Man, Philip de, and Verlinden, Nele (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2016), 75106.Google Scholar
Verosta, Stephan. Die dauernde Neutralität: Ein Grundriss. Wien: Manz, 1967.Google Scholar
Walker, George K. “Neutrality and information warfare.” International Law Studies 76 (2001): 231263.Google Scholar
Wallas, Ingo. Die völkerrechtliche Zulässigkeit der Ausfuhr kriegswichtiger Güter aus neutralen Staaten. Diss., University of Hamburg, 1970.Google Scholar
Widmer, Paul. “Staatsräson legitimiert vieles – auch Abhören und Wegschauen.” Neue Zürcher Zeitung Magazin (NZZ Magazin), March 7, 2020, https://magazin.nzz.ch/hintergrund/crypto-affaere-staatsraeson-legitimiert-vieles-ld.1545063?reduced=true.Google Scholar
Williams, Walter. “Neutrality in modern armed conflicts: A survey of the developing law.” Military Law Review 90 (1980): 948.Google Scholar
Wohltag, Johann-Christoph. “Cyber Warfare,” in The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, ed. by Peters, Anne (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021) (2015).Google Scholar
Zammit Borda, Aldo. “A Formal Approach to Article 38(1)(d) of the ICJ Statute from the Perspective of the International Criminal Courts and Tribunals.European Journal of International Law (EJIL) 24(2) (2013): 649661.Google Scholar
Arms Trade Treaty. April 2, 2013, 3013 U.N.T.S. 269 [ATT].Google Scholar
Charter of the United Nations. June 26, 1945, 1 U.N.T.S. 16 [UN Charter].Google Scholar
Convention (V) respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land. October 18, 1907 [Hague Convention V].Google Scholar
Convention (XIII) concerning the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers in Naval War. October 18, 1907 [Hague Convention XIII].Google Scholar
Department of Defense Law of War Manual. Washington D.C., U.S. Dept. of Defense (2016).Google Scholar
Federal Act of January 23, 1974, on Acts Punishable by Law [Austrian Criminal Code].Google Scholar
Federal Act of December 13, 1996, on the Control of Dual-Use Goods, Specific Military Goods and Strategic Goods, CC 946.202 [Goods Control Act, GCA].Google Scholar
Federal Act of December 13, 1996, on War Material, CC 514.51 [War Material Act, WMA].Google Scholar
Federal Act of February 3, 1995, on the Armed Forces and Military Administration, CC 510.10 [Military Act, MA].Google Scholar
Federal Act of September 25, 2015, on the Intelligence Service, CC 121 [Intelligence Service Act, IntelSA].Google Scholar
Federal Supreme Court Decision, 1956, BGE 82 IV 158 (June 21).Google Scholar
Federal Supreme Court Decision, 1975, BGE 101 IV 177 (June 21).Google Scholar
G.A. Res. ES-11/L.1, U.N. Doc. A/RES/ES-11/L.1 (March 1, 2022).Google Scholar
G.A. Res. 58/80, U.N. Doc. A/RES/58/80 (December 12, 1995).Google Scholar
German Interests in Polish Upper Silesia (Germany v. Poland), 1926 P.C.I.J. (ser. A) No. 7 (May 25).Google Scholar
Helsinki Principles on the Law of Maritime Neutrality. “Committee on Maritime Neutrality,” 68 International Law Association Report of the 68th Conference, at 496, Taipei: 1998.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). Commentary on the Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, 1987.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). Commentary on the Third Geneva Convention: Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
International Law Commission (ILC). “Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts.” Report on the work of its fifty-third session, U.N. Doc. A/56/10, at 31 (2001).Google Scholar
Manual of International Law Applicable to Air and Missile Warfare. Program on Humanitarian and Policy and Conflict Research, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University (2009).Google Scholar
Ordinance of February 25, 1998, on War Material, CC 514.511 [War Material Ordinance, WMO].Google Scholar
Ordinance of February 25, 1998, on War Material: Amendment dated August 27, 2008, OC 2008 5495.Google Scholar
Ordinance of June 3, 2016, on the Export, Import and Transit of Dual Use Goods, Specific Military Goods and Strategic Goods, CC 946.202.1 [Goods Control Ordinance, GCO].Google Scholar
Ordinance of March 4, 2022, on Measures in Connection with the Situation in Ukraine, CC 946.231.176.72.Google Scholar
Penal Code of the Republic of Costa Rica, Nr. 4573.Google Scholar
Proceedings of the Hague Conferences: The Conference of 1907. Ed. by Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, New York: Oxford University Press, 1921.Google Scholar
Sanremo Handbook on Rules of Engagement. Sanremo, Italy, International Institute of Humanitarian Law (2009).Google Scholar
Sanremo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea. Sanremo, Italy, International Institute of Humanitarian Law (1994).Google Scholar
S.C. Res. 232, U.N. Doc. S/RES/232 (December 16, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
S.C. Res. 1521, U.N. Doc. S/RES/1521 (December 22, 2003).Google Scholar
Swiss Criminal Code of December 21, 1937, CC 311.0.Google Scholar
Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations. Ed. by Michael N. Schmitt and Liis Vihul. 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Treaty for an Amicable Settlement of All Causes of Differences between the United States and Great Britain. June 17, 1871, 143 CTS, at 145 [Treaty of Washington].Google Scholar
Barz, Andreas. Der Mythos Neutralität: Zu den Wechselwirkungen zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit eines politischen Konzepts. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus-Verlagsgesellschaft, 1992.Google Scholar
Bothe, Michael. “Neutrality, concept and general rules,” in The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, ed. by Peters, Anne (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021) (2015).Google Scholar
Calmy-Rey, Micheline. Die Neutralität: Zwischen Mythos und Vorbild. Basel: NZZ Libro, Schwabe Verlagsgruppe, 2020.Google Scholar
Castrén, Erik. The Present Law of War and Neutrality. Helsinki: Finnish Academy of Science and Letters, 1954.Google Scholar
Crypto Museum. “Glossary of crypto terminology.” (February 27, 2022), accessed March 18, 2022, https://www.cryptomuseum.com/crypto/glossary.htm.Google Scholar
Crypto Museum. “Operation Rubicon.” (December 12, 2019), accessed April 25, 2021, https://www.cryptomuseum.com/intel/cia/rubicon.htm.Google Scholar
Deák, Francis. “Neutrality revisited,” in Transnational Law in a Changing Society: Essays in Honour of Philip C. Jessup, ed. by Friedmann, Wolfgang, Henkin, Louis, Lissitzyin, Oliver James, and Jessup, Philip C. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1972), 137154.Google Scholar
Diggelmann, Oliver. “Wie könnte die Schweizer Neutralität im 21. Jahrhundert aussehen.” Neue Züricher Zeitung (NZZ), May 7, 2022, https://www.nzz.ch/schweiz/wie-koennte-die-schweizer-neutralitaet-im-21-jahrhundert-aussehen-ld.1682343.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram. War, Aggression and Self-Defense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dürst, Daniel. Schweizerische Neutralität und Kriegsmaterialausfuhr .” Diss., University of Zurich, 1983.Google Scholar
Egli, Patricia. “Aktuelle Leitsätze zur Neutralität.Jusletter 21, (2006).Google Scholar
Endres, Fiona, and Vögele, Nicole. “Geheimdienstaffaire Cryptoleaks: Weltweite Spionage- Operation mit Schweizer Firma aufgedeckt.” Schweizer Radio und Fernsehen (SRF), February 11, 2020, https://www.srf.ch/news/schweiz/geheimdienstaffaere-cryptoleaks-weltweite-spionage-operation-mit-schweizer-firma-aufgedeckt.Google Scholar
[Endres, Fiona, and Vögele, Nicole]. “Weltpolitik mit manipulierten Chiffriergeräten.” Schweizer Radio und Fernsehen (SRF), February 12, 2020, https://www.srf.ch/news/international/geheimdienst-affaere-weltpolitik-mit-manipulierten-chiffriergeraeten.Google Scholar
Fauchille, Paul. Traité de droit international public. vol. 2, Paris: Rousseau et Cie, 1921.Google Scholar
Gafafer, Tobias. “Für Russland ist die Schweiz nicht mehr neutral – der Bundesrat sucht in der Krise seine Rolle.” Neue Züricher Zeitung (NZZ), April 8, 2022, https://www.nzz.ch/schweiz/fuer-russland-ist-die-schweiz-nicht-mehr-neutral-der-bundesrat-sucht-in-der-krise-seine-rolle-ld.1678456.Google Scholar
Graf Vitzthum, Wolfgang, and Proelß, Alexander. Völkerrecht. 8th ed., Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gyger, Walter B. Schweizerische Neutralität in Vergangenheit, Gegenwart und Zukunft. Zurich: Schweizerischer Aufklärungs-Dienst, 1974.Google Scholar
Haug, Hans. Neutralität und Völkergemeinschaft. Zurich: Polygraphischer Verlag, 1962.Google Scholar
Hostettler, Peter, and Danai, Olivia. “Neutrality in Land Warfare,” in The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, ed. by Peters, Anne (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021) (2015).Google Scholar
Hussmann, Markus. “Art 272,” in Basler Kommentar: Strafrecht II, 4th ed., ed. by Niggli, Marcel A. and Wiprächtiger, Hans (Basel: Helbing Lichtenhahn, 2019), 49754989.Google Scholar
Interpellation 20.4456. Jahrzehntelanger Bruch des Neutralitätsrechts durch den Nachrichtendienst: Konsequenzen und Risiken für die Schweiz, accessed April 10, 2022, https://www.parlament.ch/de/ratsbetrieb/suche-curia-vista/geschaeft?AffairId=20204456.Google Scholar
Köpfer, Josef. Die Neutralität im Wandel der Erscheinungsformen militärischer Auseinandersetzungen. Munich: Bernard & Graefe Verlag, 1975.Google Scholar
Künzli, Jörg. Vom Umgang des Rechtsstaats mit Unrechtsregimes: Völker- und landesrechtliche Grenzen des Verhaltensspielraums der schweizerischen Aussenpolitik gegenüber Völkerrecht missachtenden Staaten. Bern: Stämpfli, 2008.Google Scholar
Kurz, Hans-Rudolf. Bewaffnete Neutralität: Die militärische Bedeutung der dauernden schweizerischen Neutralität. Frauenfeld/Stuttgart: Huber, 1967.Google Scholar
Landwehr, Dominik. “Die Crypto-AG: Ein Spionage-Thriller aus dem Kalten Krieg.” Swissinfo, December 15, 2020, https://www.swissinfo.ch/ger/crypto-ag-schweiz-usa-spionage-kryptografie-kalter-krieg_die-crypto-ag--ein-spionage-thriller-aus-dem-kalten-krieg/46216566.Google Scholar
Miller, Greg. “The intelligence coup of the century: For decades, the CIA read the encrypted communications of allies and adversaries.” Washington Post, February 11, 2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/world/national-security/cia-crypto-encryption-machines-espionage/.Google Scholar
MINERVA: A history. Internal CIA publication TOP SECRET (2004), quoted in Greg Miller, “The intelligence coup of the century: For decades, the CIA read the encrypted communications of allies and adversaries.” Washington Post, February 11, 2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/world/national-security/cia-crypto-encryption-machines-espionage/.Google Scholar
MINERVA: A history. Internal CIA publication TOP SECRET (2004), quoted in Res Strehle, Operation Crypto: Die Schweiz im Dienst von CIA und BND. Basel: Echtzeit, 2020.Google Scholar
MINERVA: A history. Internal CIA publication TOP SECRET (2004), quoted in [Fiona Endres and Nicole Vögele], “Weltpolitik mit manipulierten Chiffriergeräten,” Schweizer Radio und Fernsehen (SRF), February 12, 2020, https://www.srf.ch/news/international/geheimdienst-affaere-weltpolitik-mit-manipulierten-chiffriergeraeten.Google Scholar
Neuhaus, Christina. “Ist Neutralität mit Haltung neutral?” Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ), March 4, 2022, https://www.nzz.ch/meinung/neutralitaet-im-ukraine-krieg-wo-genau-steht-die-schweiz-ld.1672971.Google Scholar
Oeter, Stefan. Neutralität und Waffenhandel. Berlin: Springer, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omlin, Esther. “Art 301,” in Basler Kommentar: Strafrecht II. 4th ed., ed. by Niggli, Marcel A. and Wiprächtiger, Hans (Basel: Helbing Lichtenhahn, 2019), 52595265.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lassa. International Law: A Treatise. 7th ed. vol. 2, ed. by Lauterpacht, Hersch (London: Longmans, 1952).Google Scholar
Pieper, Ulrike. Neutralität von Staaten. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang, 1997.Google Scholar
Politakis, George. “Variations on a myth: Neutrality and arms trade.” German Yearbook of International Law 35 (1992): 435506.Google Scholar
Report of the Control Delegation (CDel). Fall Crypto AG, November 2, 2020, https://www.parlament.ch/centers/documents/de/bericht-gpdel-2020-11-10-d.pdf.Google Scholar
Report of the interdepartmental working group. Neutralitätspraxis der Schweiz: Aktuelle Aspekte, August 30, 2000, https://www.eda.admin.ch/dam/eda/de/documents/aussenpolitik/voelkerrecht/BerichtNeutralitaetspraxis_Kosovo.2000.de.pdf.Google Scholar
Roeser, Thomas. Völkerrechtliche Aspekte des internationalen Handels mit konventionellen Waffen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotter, Manfred. Die dauernde Neutralität. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1981.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco. “Der Fall Crypto AG und die schweizerische Neutralität.” Expert Opinion, University of Geneva, February 23, 2021.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco. “Die Schweizerische Neutralitat und der Fall Crypto AG.Swiss Review of International and European Law 31(4) (2021): 523540.Google Scholar
Schaub, Adrian R. “Aktuelle Aspekte der Neutralität.” Schweizerische Zeitschrift für internationales und europäisches Recht 3 (1996): 353371.Google Scholar
Schaub, Adrian R. Neutralität und kollektive Sicherheit: Gegenüberstellung zweier unvereinbarer Verhaltenskonzepte in bewaffneten Konflikten und Thesen zu einem zeit- und völkerrechtsgemässen modus vivendi. Basel/Frankfurt a.M.: Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 1995.Google Scholar
Scheuner, Ulrich. Die Neutralität im heutigen Völkerrecht. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, Michael. Dauernde Neutralität und Europäische Integration. Wien: Springer, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweizer, Paul. Geschichte der Schweizerischen Neutralität. Frauenfeld: Huber, 1895.Google Scholar
Seger, Paul. “The Law of Neutrality,” in The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Armed Conflict, ed. by Clapham, Andrew and Gaeta, Paola (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 248270.Google Scholar
Spitteler, Carl. “Unser Schweizer Standpunkt.” (December 14, 1914), Zeit-Fragen, accessed May 13, 2022, https://www.zeit-fragen.ch/index.php?id=155.Google Scholar
Spring, Alexander. The International Law Concept of Neutrality in the 21st Century: An Analysis of Contemporary Neutrality with a Focus on Switzerland. Zurich/St. Gallen: Dike, 2014.Google Scholar
Stadlemeier, Sigmar. Dynamische Interpretation der dauernden Neutralität. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statement of the Federal Council. Fall Crypto AG: Bericht der Geschäftsprüfungsdelegation der eidgenössischen Räte vom 2. November 2020, May 26, 2021, https://www.parlament.ch/centers/documents/de/Stellungnahme-des-Bundesrates-vom-26-05-2021.pdf.Google Scholar
Strehle, Res. Operation Crypto: Die Schweiz im Dienst von CIA und BND. Basel: Echtzeit, 2020.Google Scholar
Strupp, Karl. Neutralisation, Befriedung, Entmilitarisierung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1933.Google Scholar
Stürchler, Nikolas. “Der Begriff des Krieges im Völkerrecht: Spezifisch unter dem Gesichtspunkt des Neutralitätsrechts.Schweizerische Zeitschrift für internationalen und europäisches Recht 21(4) (2011): 627645.Google Scholar
Swiss Federal Council. Aussenpolitischer Bericht 2011 (12.014), January 18, 2012, https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/fga/2012/405/de.Google Scholar
Swiss Federal Council. Bericht des Bundesrates an die Bundesversammlung über die Sicherheitspolitik der Schweiz (10.059), June 23, 2010, https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/fga/2010/876/de.Google Scholar
Swiss Federal Council. “Bericht zur Neutralität,” Anhang zum Bericht über die Aussenpolitik der Schweiz in den 90er Jahren (93.098), November 29, 1993, https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/fga/1994/1_153__/de.Google Scholar
Swiss Federal Council. Botschaft zur Volksinitiative «Gegen Waffenexporte in Bürgerkriegsländer (Korrektur-Initiative)» und zum indirekten Gegenvorschlag (Änderung des Kriegsmaterialgesetzes (21.021), March 5, 2021, https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/fga/2021/623/de.Google Scholar
Swiss Federal Council. Die Neutralität auf dem Prüfstand im Irak-Konflikt: Zusammenfassung der Neutralitätspraxis der Schweiz während des Irak-Konflikts in Erfüllung des Postulats Reimann (03.3066) und der Motion der SVP Fraktion (03.3050), December 2, 2005, https://www.dfae.admin.ch/dam/eda/de/documents/aussenpolitik/voelkerrecht/NeutralitaetspraxisSchweiz.Irak-Konflikt.de.pdf.Google Scholar
Swiss Federal Council. “Neutralität,” Anhang 1 zum aussenpolitischen Bericht 2007, June 2007, https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/fga/2007/769/de.Google Scholar
Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (FDFA). Die Neutralität der Schweiz, 2022, https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/de/home/aussenpolitik/voelkerrecht/neutralitaet.html.Google Scholar
Swiss Parliament. “Control Delegation CD,” accessed May 24, 2021, https://www.parlament.ch/en/organe/delegations/control-delegation.Google Scholar
Terry, Patrick C. R.The Riddle of the Sands – Peacetime espionage and public international law.Georgetown Journal of International Law 51(2) (2020): 377414.Google Scholar
Thevessen, Elmar, Müller, Peter F., and Stoll, Ulrich. “Operation Rubikon: #Cryptoleaks: Wie BND und CIA alle täuschten.” Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen (ZDF), February 11, 2020, https://www.zdf.de/nachrichten/politik/cryptoleaks-bnd-cia-operation-rubikon-100.html.Google Scholar
Tinoco, Arnoldo. Völkerrechtliche Grundlagen dauernder Neutralität: Die dauernde aktive und demilitarisierte Neutralität Costa Ricas unter der Satzung der Vereinten Nationen. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1989.Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert W. The Law of War and Neutrality at Sea. Washington D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, 1955.Google Scholar
United Nations, “Falkland Islands (Malvinas).” (May 15, 2019), accessed May 16, 2021, https://www.un.org/dppa/decolonization/en/nsgt/falkland-islands-malvinas.Google Scholar
Upcher, James. Neutrality in Contemporary International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Verlinden, Nele. “The Law of Neutrality,” in Armed Conflicts and the Law, ed. by Wouters, Jan, Man, Philip de, and Verlinden, Nele (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2016), 75106.Google Scholar
Verosta, Stephan. Die dauernde Neutralität: Ein Grundriss. Wien: Manz, 1967.Google Scholar
Walker, George K. “Neutrality and information warfare.” International Law Studies 76 (2001): 231263.Google Scholar
Wallas, Ingo. Die völkerrechtliche Zulässigkeit der Ausfuhr kriegswichtiger Güter aus neutralen Staaten. Diss., University of Hamburg, 1970.Google Scholar
Widmer, Paul. “Staatsräson legitimiert vieles – auch Abhören und Wegschauen.” Neue Zürcher Zeitung Magazin (NZZ Magazin), March 7, 2020, https://magazin.nzz.ch/hintergrund/crypto-affaere-staatsraeson-legitimiert-vieles-ld.1545063?reduced=true.Google Scholar
Williams, Walter. “Neutrality in modern armed conflicts: A survey of the developing law.” Military Law Review 90 (1980): 948.Google Scholar
Wohltag, Johann-Christoph. “Cyber Warfare,” in The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, ed. by Peters, Anne (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021) (2015).Google Scholar
Zammit Borda, Aldo. “A Formal Approach to Article 38(1)(d) of the ICJ Statute from the Perspective of the International Criminal Courts and Tribunals.European Journal of International Law (EJIL) 24(2) (2013): 649661.Google Scholar
Arms Trade Treaty. April 2, 2013, 3013 U.N.T.S. 269 [ATT].Google Scholar
Charter of the United Nations. June 26, 1945, 1 U.N.T.S. 16 [UN Charter].Google Scholar
Convention (V) respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land. October 18, 1907 [Hague Convention V].Google Scholar
Convention (XIII) concerning the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers in Naval War. October 18, 1907 [Hague Convention XIII].Google Scholar
Department of Defense Law of War Manual. Washington D.C., U.S. Dept. of Defense (2016).Google Scholar
Federal Act of January 23, 1974, on Acts Punishable by Law [Austrian Criminal Code].Google Scholar
Federal Act of December 13, 1996, on the Control of Dual-Use Goods, Specific Military Goods and Strategic Goods, CC 946.202 [Goods Control Act, GCA].Google Scholar
Federal Act of December 13, 1996, on War Material, CC 514.51 [War Material Act, WMA].Google Scholar
Federal Act of February 3, 1995, on the Armed Forces and Military Administration, CC 510.10 [Military Act, MA].Google Scholar
Federal Act of September 25, 2015, on the Intelligence Service, CC 121 [Intelligence Service Act, IntelSA].Google Scholar
Federal Supreme Court Decision, 1956, BGE 82 IV 158 (June 21).Google Scholar
Federal Supreme Court Decision, 1975, BGE 101 IV 177 (June 21).Google Scholar
G.A. Res. ES-11/L.1, U.N. Doc. A/RES/ES-11/L.1 (March 1, 2022).Google Scholar
G.A. Res. 58/80, U.N. Doc. A/RES/58/80 (December 12, 1995).Google Scholar
German Interests in Polish Upper Silesia (Germany v. Poland), 1926 P.C.I.J. (ser. A) No. 7 (May 25).Google Scholar
Helsinki Principles on the Law of Maritime Neutrality. “Committee on Maritime Neutrality,” 68 International Law Association Report of the 68th Conference, at 496, Taipei: 1998.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). Commentary on the Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, 1987.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). Commentary on the Third Geneva Convention: Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
International Law Commission (ILC). “Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts.” Report on the work of its fifty-third session, U.N. Doc. A/56/10, at 31 (2001).Google Scholar
Manual of International Law Applicable to Air and Missile Warfare. Program on Humanitarian and Policy and Conflict Research, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University (2009).Google Scholar
Ordinance of February 25, 1998, on War Material, CC 514.511 [War Material Ordinance, WMO].Google Scholar
Ordinance of February 25, 1998, on War Material: Amendment dated August 27, 2008, OC 2008 5495.Google Scholar
Ordinance of June 3, 2016, on the Export, Import and Transit of Dual Use Goods, Specific Military Goods and Strategic Goods, CC 946.202.1 [Goods Control Ordinance, GCO].Google Scholar
Ordinance of March 4, 2022, on Measures in Connection with the Situation in Ukraine, CC 946.231.176.72.Google Scholar
Penal Code of the Republic of Costa Rica, Nr. 4573.Google Scholar
Proceedings of the Hague Conferences: The Conference of 1907. Ed. by Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, New York: Oxford University Press, 1921.Google Scholar
Sanremo Handbook on Rules of Engagement. Sanremo, Italy, International Institute of Humanitarian Law (2009).Google Scholar
Sanremo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea. Sanremo, Italy, International Institute of Humanitarian Law (1994).Google Scholar
S.C. Res. 232, U.N. Doc. S/RES/232 (December 16, 1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
S.C. Res. 1521, U.N. Doc. S/RES/1521 (December 22, 2003).Google Scholar
Swiss Criminal Code of December 21, 1937, CC 311.0.Google Scholar
Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations. Ed. by Michael N. Schmitt and Liis Vihul. 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Treaty for an Amicable Settlement of All Causes of Differences between the United States and Great Britain. June 17, 1871, 143 CTS, at 145 [Treaty of Washington].Google Scholar