Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-qc88w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-21T19:35:46.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corrections and input quantities in measurement models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2013

F. Pavese
F. Pavese*
Affiliation:
Torino, Italy
*
⋆ Correspondence: frpavese@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

The Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM) requires, “that the results of a measurement have been corrected for all recognised significant systematic effects and that every effort has been made to identify such effects”, before the issue of evaluating their uncertainty is tackled. In addition, the GUM also requires that a model is used, expressing the functional dependence of the measurand on identified input quantities. The paper discusses the inter-relations between the so-defined two sets of influence quantities and proposes to unify their treatment.

Keywords

GUMcorrectioninfluence quantitymodelsystematic effect

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , 2012 , pp. 155 - 159
Copyright
© EDP Sciences 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML, Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM) – Supplement 1: Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method, 2nd edn. (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), Sèvres, 1995), http://www.bipm.org
CIPM, Mutual Recognition of National Measurement Standards and of Calibration and Measurement Certificates Issued by National Metrology Institutes (BIPM, Sèvres, 1999), http://www.bipm.org
F. Pavese, On the difference of meaning of ‘zero correction’: zero value versus no correction, and of the associated uncertainties, in Advanced Mathematical and Computational Tools in Metrology IX, edited by F. Pavese et al. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2012), Vol. 9, pp. 297–309
Magnusson, B., Ellison, S.L.R., Treatment of uncorrected measurement bias in uncertainty estimation for chemical measurements, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 390, 201–213 (2008) CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavese, F., Methods for the assessment of correction for chemical-impurity effects and related uncertainty in ITS-90 fixed points, namely of e-H2, Ne, O2 and Ar, Metrologia 48, 268–274 (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, OIML, International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology (BIPM, Sèvres, 2008), http://www.bipm.org
International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 60359 (2001)