Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 January 2009
The sharifs of Hasanid descent, commonly referred to as the Banū Hasan, who ruled Mecca and its dependencies from the middle of the fourth century A.H./tenth century A.D. until the early twentieth century, can be divided into three major dynastic branches, each of which bears the name of the first of its members to attain the office of emir of Mecca. Thus, the first dynasty of the Hasanid sharifs of Mecca, known as the Jaʿfarids, was founded by Jaʿfar b. Muhammad b. al-Husayn al-Amīr, a descendant in the ninth generation of al-Hasan b. ʿAlī b. Abī Ṭālib, in about the year 357/968, shortly before the conquest of Egypt for the Fatimids of North Africa by their general, Jawhar, in 358/969. Control of Mecca remained in the hands of the Jaʿfarids until the last representative of the line, Shukr b. Abī'l-Futūḥ, died without leaving a male heir in 453/ 1061.
1 For detailed information concerning the political and economic history of Mecca from the foundation of the sharifate until the end of the Mamluk era, see Mortel, Richard, al-Ahwāl al-siyāsiyya wa 'l-iqtisādiyya bi-Makka fi'l-'asr al-Mamlūkī (Riyadh, 1985).Google Scholar
2 A thorough discussion of the problems involved in establishing the genealogy of the founder of this dynasty and the reasons for its being called “Ja'farid” can be found in Mortel, Richard T., “The Genealogy of the Hasanid Sharifs of Mecca,” Journal of the College of Arts, King Saud University, 12, 2 (1985), 221–50.Google Scholar
3 See, for example, Wensinck, A. J., “Mecca,” in the Encyclopaedia of Islam, 1st ed.;Google ScholarLittle, Donald P., “The History of Arabia During the BaHrī Mamlūk Period According to Three Mamlūk Historians,” in Abdalla, Abdulgadir M., al-Sakkar, Sami, and Mortel, Richard T., eds., Studies in the History of Arabia, Vol. I, Part 2:Google ScholarSources for the History of Arabia (Riyad, 1979), p. 216;Google Scholaral-Sulaymān, 'Alī b. Husayn, al-'Alāqāt al-Hijāziyya al-Misriyya zamān salātīn al-Mamālīk (Cairo, 1973), pp. 28–29;Google ScholarSurūr, MuHammad Jamāl al-Dīn, Siyāsat al-Fātimiyyīn al-khārijiyya (Cairo, 1976), p. 34.Google Scholaral-Zayla'ī, 'AHmad 'Umar, Makka wa 'alāqātuhā al-khārijiyya (301–487 A. H.) (Riyad, 1981), makes no mention of this problem.Google Scholar
4 See, for example, Qāsī, 'Ā'isha bint 'Abd Allāh Bā, Bilād al-Hijāz fi'l-'asr al-Ayyūbī (Mecca, 1980), p. 20;Google Scholaral-Qūsī, 'Atiyya, Tijārat Misr fi'l-Bahr al-Aamar mundhu fajr al-Islām hattā suqūt al-khilāfa al-'Abbāsiyya (Cairo, 1976), p. 109.Google Scholar
5 Khaldūn, 'Abd al-RaHmān b. Muhammad b., Kitāb al-'ibar wa dīwān al-mubtada wa'l-khabar (Cairo, 1284 A.H.), vol. 4, p. 99. The text reads, “al-Zabīdī,” i.e., a native of Zabīd in Yemen, instead of “al-Zaydī,” but it is clearly in error given the contextual meaning.Google Scholar
6 Najm al-Dīn 'Umar b. Muhammad b. Fahd, “Ithāf al-warā bi-akhbār Umm al-Qurā,” manuscript at King Saud University Library, Riyadh, no. f113/2, events of the year 358; al-Ansārī, 'Abd al-Qādir b. Muhammad al-Jazīrī, Durar al-fawā'id al-mu'azzama fī akhbār al-hajj wa tarīq Makka al-mukarrama (Cairo, 1384 A.H.), pp. 244–45.Google Scholar
7 al-Jawzī, Abu'l-Faraj 'Abd al-Rahmān b., al-Muntazam fī tārīkh al-mulūk wa'l-umam (Hyderabad, 1358 A.H.), vol. 7, p. 75;Google Scholaral-Athīr, 'Izz al-Dīn 'Alī b. Muhammad b., al-Kāmil fi'l-tārīkh (Beirut, 1965–1966), vol. 8, p. 648.Google Scholar
8 al-Maqrīzī, Taqī al-Dīn Ahmad b. 'Alī, Itti'āz al-zunafā bi-akhbār al-ā'ima al-Fātimiyyīn al-khulafā (Cairo, 1967–1973), vol. I, pp. 225, 230.Google Scholar
9 Muyassar, Muhammad b. 'Alī b., Akhbār Misr (Cairo, 1919), pp. 47, 49;Google Scholaral-Jawzī, Ibn, Muntazam, vol. 7, pp. 80–81;Google Scholaral-Athīr, Ibn, Kāmil, vol. 8, p. 667;Google Scholaral-Maqrīzī, , Itti'āz al-Hunafā, vol. I, pp. 252, 267, 272;Google Scholar see also my article, “Masādir al-tamwīn al-ghidhā'ī li-imārat Makka,” in Journal of the College of Arts, King Saud University, 12, 1 (1985), 193–219.Google Scholar
10 According to a late (ninth/fifteenth-century) source, the commander of the Iraqi pilgrimage caravan proclaimed the khutba in Mecca in the name of the Buwayhid Sultan 'Adūd al-Dawla and the 'Abbasid Caliph al-Tā'i' during the pilgrimage season of 368/979; see 'Umar b. Fahd, “lthāf al-warā,” events of the year 368. The Buwayhids were, of course, Shi'is.Google Scholar
11 al-Fāsī, Taqī al-Dīn Muhammad b. Ahmad, Shfā' al-gharām bi-akhbār al-balad al-Harām (Cairo, 1956), vol. 2, p. 197;Google ScholarSurūr, Siyāsat al-Fātimiyyīn, p. 28;Google ScholarMortel, Ahwāl, pp. 17–25;Google Scholaral-Hamdānī, Husayn, al-Sulayhiyyūn wa'l-Haraka al-Fätimiyya bi'l- Yaman (Cairo, 1955), p. 95.Google Scholar Evidence for the mention of the names of the Fatimid caliphs in the khutba in Mecca and the annual Fatimid presentation of the kiswa, or ceremonial covering, to the Ka'ba during the pilgrimage season—both indications of Fatimid sovereignty over Mecca—during the period of the Ja'farids, can be found in the following sources: Muyassar, Ibn, Akhbār Misr, p. 49;Google Scholaral-Jawzī, Ibn, Muntazam, vol. 8, p. 105;Google Scholaral-Athīr, Ibn, Kāmil, vol. 8, p. 667;Google Scholaral-Maqrīzī, , Itti'āz, vol. I, pp. 225, 246, 252–53, 267, 272, 281, 282, 284, 289; vol. 2, pp. 7, 8, 15, 20, 24, 41, 51, 59, 68, 95;Google Scholaral-Jazīrī, Durar, p. 254.Google Scholar
12 For accounts of Abū'l-FutūH's revolt, see al-Rudhārawrī, Abū Shujā' Muhammad b. al-Husayn, Dhayl tajārib al-umam (Cairo, 1916), vol. 3, pp. 236, 238;Google Scholaral-Azdī, Jamāl al-Dīn 'Alī b. Zāfir, Akhbār al-duwal al-munqati'a (Cairo, 1972), pp. 48, 49, 50;Google ScholarKhallikān, Abū'l-'Abbās Shams al-Dīn Ahmad b. Muhammad b., Wafayāt al-a'yān wa anbā' abnā' al-zamān (Beirut, 1968–1972), vol. 2, pp. 174–75;Google ScholarKhaldūn, Ibn, 'Ibar, vol. 4, p. 102;Google Scholaral-Hasanī, Jamāl al-Dīn Ahmad b. 'Alī b. 'Inaba, “'Umdat al-tālib fī ansāb āl Abī Tālib,” in Majmū'at al-rasā'il al-Kamāliyya (8) fi'l-ansāb (al-Tā'if, 1980), p. 233;Google Scholaral-Fāsī, , al-'Iqd al-thamīn fī tārīkh al-balad al-amīn (Cairo, 1959–1969), vol. 4, pp. 70–72, 74, 75;Google Scholaridem, Shifā' al-gharām, vol. 2, p. 195; al-Maqrīzī, , Itti'āz al-Hunafā, vol. 2, pp. 87, 95; 'Umar b. Fahd, “ItHāf al-warā,” events of 401.Google Scholar
13 Shujā', Abu, Dhayl, vol. 3, p. 236;Google ScholarKhallikān, Ibn, Wafayāt al-a'yān, vol. 2, pp. 174–75;Google Scholaral-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 4, p. 71.Google Scholar
14 Khaldūn, Ibn, 'Ibar, vol. 4, p. 101; 'Umar b. Fahd, “Ithāf al-warā,” events of 395.Google Scholar
15 See al-Shahrastānī, Muhammad b. 'Abd al-Karīm, Kitāb al-milal wa'l-nihal (Cairo, 1967), vol. 1, pp. 154–57;Google Scholaral-Baghdādī, 'Abd al-Qāhir b. Tāhir, al-Farq bayn al-firaq (Beirut, n.d.), pp. 22–23, 30–37,Google Scholar for a discussion of the fundamental tenets of Zaydi Shi'ism. It deserves to be mentioned that a minority of Zaydi scholars are known to have adopted a radical pro-Imami Shi'i position vis-à-vis the Companions, and permitted their public vilification. The mainstream of Zaydi thought, however, seems clearly opposed to such practices. See Kohlberg, E., “Some Zaydi Views on the Companions of the Prophet,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 39 (1976), 94–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 For further information regarding Mecca's relations with the Fatimids and the 'Abbasids during this period, see Mortel, Ahwāl, pp. 23–31;Google ScholarSurūr, Siyāsat al-Fātimiyyīn, pp. 28–33.Google Scholar
17 Bardī, Jamāl al-Dīn Abū'l-Mahāsin Yūsuf b. Taghrī, al-Nujūm al-zāhira fī mulūk Misr wa'l-Qāhira (Cairo, ?–1972), vol. 5, p. 89.Google Scholar
18 al-Jawzī, Sibt Ibn, Quzaoghlū, Yūsuf b., Mir'āt al-zamān fī tārīkh al-a'yān (Hyderabad, 1952), vol. 8, pp. 300–301.Google Scholar
19 al-Jawzī, Sibt Ibn, Mir'āt al-zamān, vol. 8, p. 388;Google Scholarlsmā'īl, Shihāb al-Dīn Abū Muhammad 'Abd al-Rahmān b., al-Maqdisī, Abū Shāma, Kitāb al-rawdatayn fī akhbār al-dawlatayn (Cairo, 1287–1288 A.H.), vol. 2, p. 74;Google Scholaral-Fāsī, , 'lqd, vol. 5, p. 62;Google ScholarBardī, Ibn Taghrī, Nujūm, vol. 6, p. 103; 'Umar b. Fahd, “ItHāf al-warā,” events of 581.Google Scholar
20 Jubayr, Abū'l-Husayn Muhammad b. Ahmad b., Tadhkira bi'l-akhbār 'an ittifāqāt al-asfār (Cairo, 1968), p. 11.Google Scholar
21 Ibid., p. 84.
22 Ibid., p. 106.
23 Ibid., pp. 84–85.
24 Khaldūn, Ibn, 'Ibar, vol. 4, p. 105;Google Scholaral-Fāsī, , 'lqd, vol. 4, p. 70.Google Scholar
25 Bardī, Ibn Taghrī, Nujūm, vol. 6, pp. 249–50.Google Scholar
26 al-Athīr, Ibn, Kāmil, vol. 12, p. 401;Google ScholarKhaldūn, Ibn, 'Ibar, vol. 4, p. 105;Google Scholaral-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 7, p. 39.Google Scholar
27 Kathīr, 'Imād al-Dīn Ismā'īl b., al-Bidāya wa'l-nihāya fi'l-tārīkh (Cairo, 1351–1358 A.H.), vol. 13, p. 92.Google Scholar
28 Al-Fāsī, , 'lqd, vol. 7, p. 57;Google ScholarBardī, Ibn Taghrī, Nujūm, vol. 6, p. 250.Google Scholar
29 al-Mujāwir, Jamāl al-Dīn Abū'l-Fath Yūsuf b. Ya'qūb b., Tārīkh al-mustabsir (Leiden, 1951), vol. 1, p. 5.Google Scholar
30 Further details concerning the complex political history of this period can be found in Mortel, Ahwāl, pp. 42–52.Google Scholar
31 al-Tujībī, Al-Qāsim b. Yūsuf al-Sibtī, Mustafād al-riHla wa 'l-ightirāb (Tunis, 1975), p. 297.Google Scholar
32 Ibid., p. 298.
33 Ibid., p. 297.
34 Ibid., pp. 298–99, 300.
35 Al-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 1, p. 467.Google Scholar
36 Al-Maqrīzī, , Kitāb al-sulūk li-ma'rifat duwal al-mulūk (Cairo, 1956–1973), vol. 1, p. 927;Google ScholarBardī, Ibn Taghrī, Nujūm, vol. 8, pp. 199–200.Google Scholar
37 For the events of the half-century (701/1301–746/1345) during which the office of Emir of Mecca was held by the sons of Abū Numayy, see Mortel, Ahwāl, pp. 65–92;Google Scholaral-Sibā'ī, T¯rīkh Makka, pp. 262–72.Google Scholar
38 The importance of the Egyptian amīr al-Hājj in the history of Mecca during the Mamlūk period has been dealt with by 'Ankawī, 'Abdullāh in “The Pilgrimage to Mecca in Mamlūk Times,” in Arabian Studies, 1 (1974), 146–70.Google Scholar
39 al-Nuwayrī, Shihāb al-Dīn Ahmad b. 'Abd al-Wahhāb, “Nihāyat al-arib fī funūn al-adab,” manuscript, Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Misriyya, no. 549 ma'ārif 'āmma vol. 30, f. 7;Google Scholaral-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 4, p. 234;Google Scholaral-'Asqalānī, Ibn Hajar, al-Durar al-kāmina fī a'yān al-mi'a al-thāmina (Cairo, 1966), vol. 2, p. 167;Google Scholaral-'Aynī, Badr al-Dīn Muhammad, “'Iqd al-jumān fī tārīkh ahl al-zamān,” manuscript, Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Misriyya, no. 1584 tārīkh, vol. 21, ff. 267–68.Google Scholar
40 Al-Maqrīzī, , Sulūk, vol. 1, pp. 940–41;Google ScholarHajar, Ibn, Durar, vol. 2, pp. 9–10;Google ScholarFahd, Ibn, “Ithāf al-warā,” events of 702;Google Scholaral-Jazīrī, Durar, p. 291.Google Scholar
41 al-Khazrajī, 'Alīb. al-Hasan, al-'Uqūd al-lu'lu'iyya fi tārīkh al-dawla al-Rasūliyya (Cairo, 1911–1914), vol. 1, p. 362;Google Scholaral-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 4, pp. 234, 405–6;Google Scholaral-Maqrīzī, , Sulūk, vol. 2, p. 11.Google Scholar
42 Ismā'īl, Al-Malik al-Mu'ayyad, Abū'l-Fidā, , al-Mukhtasar fi tārīkh al-bashar (Cairo, 1323 A.H.), vol. 4, p. 76.Google Scholar
43 Al-Fāsī, , 'Lqd, vol. 4, p. 233; vol. 7, p. 80.Google Scholar
44 Abū'l-Fidā, , Mukhtasar, vol. 4, p. 76;Google Scholaral-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 4, pp. 237–38;Google Scholaral-Maqrīzī, , Sulūk, vol. 2, p. 145;Google Scholar see also Jomier, Jacques, Le Mahmal, Bulletin de l'Institut Français d'Archéologie Orientale, Recherches d'Archéologie, de Philologie et d'Histoire (Cairo, 1953), vol. 20, p. 45.Google Scholar
45 Al-Nuwayrī, “Nihāyat al-arib,” vol. 30, f. 315;Google Scholaral-Fāsī, , 'lqd vol. 4, pp. 238, 407–8;Google Scholaral-'Aynī, “'Iqd al-jumān,” vol. 23, f. 54.Google Scholar
46 Uljaytū's conversion to Shi'ism is discussed in Sir Howorth, Henry, History of the Mongols(London, 1876–1888), vol. 3, p. 559;Google Scholar“The Saljuq and Mongol Periods,” in The Cambridge History of Islam (Cambridge, 1968), vol. 5, pp. 402, 543–44;Google ScholarSpuler, Bertold, Die Mongolen in Iran (Berlin, 1968), pp. 190–91.Google Scholar llkhanid designs on Syria are reviewed in Howorth, , History, vol. 3, pp. 565–67, 577–79;Google ScholarSpuler, Mongolen, pp. 111f.;Google ScholarHammād, Fāyid'Āshūr al-'Alāqāt al-siyāsiyya bayn al-Mamālīk wa'l-Mughūl fi'l-dawla al-Mamlūkiyya al-ūlā (Cairo, 1976), pp. 174–76, 182–85.Google Scholar
47 A1-Nuwayrī, “Nihāyat al-arib,” vol. 30, ff. 345, 355–56;Google ScholarAbu'l-Fidā, , Mukhtasar, vol. 4, pp. 83–84;Google Scholarlbn 'Inaba 'Umdat al-tālib, p. 242;Google Scholaral-Maqrīzī, , Sulūk, vol. 2, pp. 147–48;Google ScholarHoworth, , History, vol. 3, p. 572.Google Scholar
48 Kathīr, Ibn, Bidāya, vol. 19, pp. 77–78.Google Scholar
49 A1-Nuwayrī, “Nihāyat al-arab,” vol. 30, f. 356;Google ScholarAbī'l-Fadā'il, al-Mufaddal b., al-Nahj al-sadīd wa'l-durr al-farīd fī mā ba'd ta'rīkh Ibn al'Amīd, in Patrologia Orientalis, vol. 20 (Paris, 1928), pp. 262f.;Google Scholaral-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 4, p. 240;Google Scholaral-'Aynī, “Iqd al-jumān,” vol. 23, f. 70;Google ScholarFahd, lbn, “Ithaf al-warā,” events of 716;Google ScholarSpuler, Mongolen, p. 191.Google Scholar
50 Al-Nuwayrī, “Nihāyrī al-arib,” vol. 30, f. 405;Google ScholarHajar, Ibn, Durar, vol. 2, pp. 167–68;Google Scholaral-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 4, pp. 242, 409;Google Scholaral-'Aynī, “'Iqd al-jumān,” vol. 23, f. 149.Google Scholar
51 Al-Nuwayrī, “Nihāyat al-arib,” vol. 30, f. 406;Google ScholarAbū'l-Fidā, , Mukhtasar, vol. 4, p. 87;Google Scholaral-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 4, pp. 87, 410; vol. 6, p. 96;Google Scholaral-Maqrīzī, , Sulūk, vol. 2, pp, 185, 190;Google Scholaral-'Aynī, “lqd aljumān,” vol. 23, ff. 168–69.Google Scholar
52 Al-Nuwayrī, “Nihāyat al-arib,” vol. 30, ff. 406, 420–21;Google Scholar see also al-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 4, p. 410;Google Scholaral-Maqrīzī, , Sulūk, vol. 2, p. 185.Google Scholar
53 Al-Nuwayrī, “Nihāyat al-arib,” vol. 30, f. 421;Google ScholarAbū'l-Fidā, , Mukhtasar, vol. 4, p. 92.Google Scholar
54 Al-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 4, p. 412; vol. 6, p. 97.Google Scholar
56 Al-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 6, pp. 98–99.Google Scholar
55 Muhammad b. al-Mutahhar b. YaHhyā was the nineteenth Zaydi imam of the Yemen, whose reign extended from 701/1301 to 728/1327; see Sayyid, Ayman Fu'ād, Masādir tārīkh at- Yaman fi'l-'aHr al-Islāmī (Cairo, 1974), p. 407.Google Scholar
57 Al-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 6, p. 99.Google Scholar
58 Shams al-Dīn Abū 'Abd Allāh Muhammad b. Majd al-Dīn al-Jazarī, ‘Tārīkh al-Jazarī,” manuscript, Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Misriyya, no. 995 tārīkh, vol. 3, f. 12;Google Scholar see also al-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 6, p. 98, after al-Jazarī.Google Scholar
59 Battūta, Abū 'Abd Allāh Muhammad b. 'Abd Allāh b., Tuhfat al-nuzaār fī gharā'ib al-amsār wa'ajā'ib al-asfār (Beirut, 1964), p. 161.Google Scholar
60 Ibid., pp. 148, 161.
61 al'Umarī, Shihāb al-Dīn Ahmad b. Yahya b. Fadl Allāh, al-Ta'rīf bi'l-mustalahh al-sharīf (Cairo, 1312 A.H.), p. 160.Google Scholar
62 Al-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 4, p. 417.Google Scholar
63 Ibid. vol. 8, pp. 89–90.
64 Al-Maqrīzī, , Sulūk, vol. 2, p. 904;Google ScholarFahd, Ibn, “Ithāf al-warā”, events of 754.Google Scholar
65 Al-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 3, p. 399;Google ScholarIbn Taghrī Bardī, “al-Manhal al-sāfī wa'l-mustawfī ba'd al-wāfī,” manuscript, Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Misriyya no. 1113 tārīkh, vol. 1, f. 451a.Google Scholar
66 Al-Maqrīzī, , Sulūk, vol. 2, p. 904;Google ScholarFahd, Ibn, “Ithāf al-warā,” events of 754.Google Scholar
67 Al-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 6, p. 70;Google Scholaral-'Asqalānī, lbn Hajar, Inbā' al-ghumr bi-anbā' al-'umr (Cairo, 1969–1972), vol. 1, p. 115;Google ScholarBardī, Ibn Taghrī, “Manhal,” vol. 2, f. 377b;Google Scholaridem, Nujūm, vol. 11, p. 139.
68 Abū Bakr Ahmad b. Muhammad b. Qādī Shuhba, “Dhayl Tārīkh al-Islām,” manuscript, Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Misriyya, no. 392 tārīkh, vol. 3, f. 161b.Google Scholar
69 Bardī, lbn Taghrī, al-Manhalal-sāfī (Cairo, 1956), p. 371.Google Scholar
70 al-Qalqashandī, Shihāb al-Dīn Abu'l-'Abbās Ahmad b.'Alī, Qalā'd al-jumān fi'l-ta'īf biqabā'il 'Arab al-zamān (Cairo, 1963), p. 162;Google Scholaridem, Subh al-a'shā fi sina 'at al-inshā (Cairo, 1910–1920), vol. 8, p. 227.
71 Al-Qalqashandī, , Subh a1-a'shā, vol. 5, p. 52.Google Scholar
72 al-Sakhāwī, Shams al-Dīn Muhammad b. 'Abd al-Rahmān, al-Daw' al-lāmi' li-ahl al-qarn al-tāsi' (Beirut, n.d.), vol. 3, p. 104.Google Scholar
73 Al-Fāsī, , 'Iqd, vol. 6, p. 71.Google Scholar
74 Najm al-Dīn 'Umar b. Muhammad b. Fahd, “al-Durr al-kamīn bi-dhayl al-'iqd al-thamīn fī tārīkh al-balad al-amīn,” manuscript, King Saud University Library, Riyadh, no. f 19, ff. 90b, 150a, 184a.Google Scholar
75 Ibid., f. 150a.
76 Ibid., f. 98a; al-Sakhāwī, , Daw', vol. 3, p. 13;Google Scholaral-SuyūTī, Jalāl al-Dīn 'Abd al-Rahmān b. Abī Bakr Muhammad, Nazm al-'aqyān fī'yān al-a'yān (New York, 1927), p. 100.Google Scholar
77 Fahd, Najm al-Dīn 'Umar b. Muhammad b., Mu'jam al-shuyūkh (Riyadh, n.d.), pp. 352–53.Google Scholar
78 Al-Sakhāwī, , Daw', vol. 7, pp. 151–52;Google Scholaral-Shawkānī, Muhammad b. 'Alī, al-Badr al-tli' bi-mahāsin man ba'd al-qarn al-sābi' (Cairo, 1348 A.H.), vol. 2, p. 140.Google Scholar
79 al-'lsmī, 'Abd al-Malik b. Husayn, Simt al-nujūm al-'awālī fī anbā' al-awā'il wa'l-tawālī (Cairo, n.d.), vol. 4, pp. 280–81.Google Scholar
