Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Murchison, Julian and Coats, Curtis 2015. Ethnography of Religious Instants: Multi-Sited Ethnography and the Idea of “Third Spaces”. Religions, Vol. 6, Issue. 3, p. 988.

    Rahman, Azimaton Abdul Hashim, Nor Hazlina and Mustafa, Hasrina 2015. Muslims in cyberspace: exploring factors influencing online religious engagements in Malaysia. Media Asia, Vol. 42, Issue. 1-2, p. 61.

    Suhr, Christian 2015. The failed image and the possessed: examples of invisibility in visual anthropology and Islam. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol. 21, Issue. S1, p. 96.

    Harris, Rachel 2014. ‘The Oil is Sizzling in the Pot’: Sound and Emotion in Uyghur Qur'anic Recitation. Ethnomusicology Forum, Vol. 23, Issue. 3, p. 331.

    Sunier, Thijl 2014. Domesticating Islam: exploring academic knowledge production on Islam and Muslims in European societies. Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 37, Issue. 6, p. 1138.

    Armanios, Febe and Amstutz, Andrew 2013. EMERGING CHRISTIAN MEDIA IN EGYPT: CLERICAL AUTHORITY AND THE VISUALIZATION OF WOMEN IN COPTIC VIDEO FILMS. International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 45, Issue. 03, p. 513.

    Jouili, Jeanette 2012. Halal arts: what's in a concept?. Material Religion, Vol. 8, Issue. 3, p. 402.

  • International Journal of Middle East Studies, Volume 44, Issue 1
  • February 2012, pp. 5-21



This paper explores what I call “online experiments in ethical affect” through an analysis of one popular Islamic genre: the short video segments of Friday sermons (khuṭub, s. khuṭba) placed on the video-sharing website YouTube. In my discussion of this media form, I give particular attention to the kind of devotional discourse and ethical socius that is enacted online around these taped performances: notably, the practices of appending written comments to specific videos, offering responses to comments left by others or criticisms directed at either the preacher or other commentators, and the act of creating links between khuṭba pages and other web-based content. In examining these practices, I want to look at the way some of the norms of ethical and devotional comportment associated with the khuṭba in the mosque carry over to the Internet context of khuṭba listening/viewing while also engendering novel forms of pious interaction, argument, and listening.

Corresponding author
Charles Hirschkind is an Associate Professor in the Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, Calif.; e-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Peter Mandeville , Transnational Muslim Politics: Reimagining the Umma (London and New York: Routledge, 2001)

Kristen Zahra Sands , “Muslims, Identity, and Multimodal Communication on the Internet,” Contemporary Islam 4 (2010): 139–55

Samuli Schielke , “Ambivalent Commitments: Troubles of Morality, Religiosity and Aspiration among Young Egyptians,” Journal of Religion in Africa 39 (2009): 158–85

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Middle East Studies
  • ISSN: 0020-7438
  • EISSN: 1471-6380
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-middle-east-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *