Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-888d5979f-g6cgc Total loading time: 0.286 Render date: 2021-10-28T09:23:31.343Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

COMPARING THE HTA CORE MODEL WITH A NATIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2015

Iris Pasternack
Affiliation:
Summaryx Ltd., Helsinki, Finland
Ingrid de Groot
Affiliation:
The National Health Care Institute, The Netherlands
Sarah Kleijnen
Affiliation:
The National Health Care Institute, The Netherlands
Paula Polman
Affiliation:
The National Health Care Institute, The Netherlands

Abstract

Objectives: The HTA Core Model is a framework for producing health technology assessments (HTAs) in a structured format. The Model splits the content of a HTA into assessment elements. The objective is to explore the adaptability of these assessment elements in national report production in a pilot case study comparing a national HTA report and the HTA Core Model.

Methods: An on-going Dutch HTA report on endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) was chosen as a typical representative of a national report on medical interventions. The author of the EVAR report assessed the relevance and comprehensiveness of the assessment elements of the HTA Core Model for her work. Another researcher annotated the Core Model specific content in the EVAR report. Matching and missing content, as well as the distribution of information in the EVAR report were tabulated and analysed in joint deliberations.

Results: Forty percent of the assessment elements of the Core Model were considered relevant for the EVAR report. Some issues relevant for EVAR but missing from the Core Model were identified: they were about re-interventions, secondary prevention, subpopulations that benefit most, and the length of the hospital stay. The distribution of information differed substantially between the Code Model and the national report.

Conclusions: The assessment elements of the HTA Core Model covered most relevant questions of the national report. In order to facilitate easy adaptation of information, the distribution of information should be more consistent in the national report and the Core model.

Type
Theme Submissions
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lampe, K, Mäkelä, M, Velasco Garrido, M, et al. The HTA Core Model: A novel method for producing and reporting health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 (Suppl 2):920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Pasternack, I, Anttila, H, Mäkelä, M, et al. Testing the HTA Core Model: Experiences from two pilot projects. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 (Suppl 2):2127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Groot de, I, Ligtenberg, G, Vijgen, S. Concept achtergrondrapportage beoordeling stand van de wetenschap en praktijk. Endovasculaire behandeling van de abdominale aneurysma van de aorta. College voor zorgverzekeringen, Diemen. 2011.Google Scholar
4. HTA Core Model Online [Internet]. THL National Institute for Health and Welfare (Finland). [updated 2013, refd 2013 Oct 21]. http://meka.thl.fi/htacore/ (accessed 9th December 2014).Google Scholar
5. Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Vist, G, et al. for the GRADE Working Group. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

COMPARING THE HTA CORE MODEL WITH A NATIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORT
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

COMPARING THE HTA CORE MODEL WITH A NATIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORT
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

COMPARING THE HTA CORE MODEL WITH A NATIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORT
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *