Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:42:26.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mentoring as a potential means to assist consumer representatives contribute effectively to the assessment of health technologies in Australia: a pragmatic review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2021

Christine Walker Open the ORCID record for Christine Walker [Opens in a new window] ,
Jan Donovan  and
Jo Watson
Christine Walker*
Affiliation:
HTA Consumer Consultative Committee, Office of Health Technology Assessment and Access Division, Australian Government Department of Health, Canberra, Australia
Jan Donovan
Affiliation:
HTA Consumer Consultative Committee, Office of Health Technology Assessment and Access Division, Australian Government Department of Health, Canberra, Australia
Jo Watson
Affiliation:
HTA Consumer Consultative Committee, Office of Health Technology Assessment and Access Division, Australian Government Department of Health, Canberra, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Christine Walker, E-mail: xine@spin.net.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

This project was implemented on behalf of the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Consumer Consultative Committee (CCC) to explore training to support and retain new consumer representatives to participate effectively in HTA committees. These committees are key parts of the Australian Government's health system. Currently, there is no training available to them, specific to their roles in HTA committees. Hypothesizing that mentoring is appropriate, the project team undertook a literature review to identify definitions of mentoring, its benefits, skills requirements, resources, examples of best practice, and how mentoring might support consumer representatives in formal health technology assessment committee structures.

Methods

A rapid review was commenced by the project team and fifty-seven articles were identified and read independently. Following discussion, the team revised its approach as there was little evidence to assess and drew upon thirty-five articles where elements of mentoring were described. Discussion was followed by a thematic qualitative analysis exploring mentoring models.

Results

The project team agreed that features of mentoring programs were necessary to design a mentoring program under the headings of definitions, mentors’ qualities, benefits of training, resources, other considerations, and evaluation. These assist the design of a pilot project to test mentoring's effectiveness.

Conclusion

Mentoring may assist consumers working in the health technology area to develop their skills and competencies and contribute to representing the needs of health consumers in the approval of applications. A pilot mentoring program is currently being designed and will run with one mentor and one mentee in an HTA committee.

Keywords

MentoringHealth technology assessmentHealthcare consumersHealth consumer representatives
Type
Article Commentary
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , 2022 , e3
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Government Department of Health [Internet]. Health technology assessment, consumers and communities, HTA consumer consultative committee [cited 2018 Apr 21]. Available from: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/hta/publishing.nsf/Content/cccGoogle Scholar
Health Consumers New South Wales [Internet]. Who is a consumer and other definitions [cited 2021 May 10]. Available from: https://www.hcnsw.org.au/consumers-toolkit/who-is-a-health-consumer-and-other-definitionsGoogle Scholar
Berglas, S, Vatour, N, Bell, D. Creating a patient and community advisory committee at the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021;37:E19. doi:10.1017/S026646232000225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norburn, L, Thomas, L. Expertise experience, and excellence. Twenty years of patient involvement in health technology assessment at NICE: an evolving story. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021;37:E15. doi:10.1017/S026646320000860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, L, Polisena, J, Scott, AM, Holtarf, AP, Stanisewska, S, Facey, K. Evaluation of patient and public involvement initiatives in health technology assessment: a survey of international agencies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017;33:715–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chinnasamy, J. Mentoring and adult learning: andragogy in action. Int J Manag Rev. 2013;3:28–35.Google Scholar
Virginia Commonwealth University [Internet]. Virginia commonwealth university libraries research guide. [cited 2018 Apr 9]. Available from: https://guides.library.vcu.edu/rapidreviewGoogle Scholar
Tricco, A, Antony, J, Wasifa, Z, Strifler, L, Ghassemi, M, Ivory, J, et al. A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Med. 2015;13:224. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abelson, J, Wagner, F, DeJean, D, Boesveld, S, Gauvin, FP, Bean, S, et al. Public and patient involvement in health technology assessment: a framework for action. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016;32:256–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaltenthaler, E, Cooper, K, Pandor, A, Martyn-St James, M, Chatters, R, Wong, R. The use of rapid review methods in health technology assessments: 3 case studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:108. doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0216-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manchester Metropolitan University [Internet]. Mentoring Guidelines - Manchester Metropolitan University, Human Resources - Organisational Development, Training and Diversity. [cited 2018 Feb 6]. Available from: www.mentormatch.mmu.ac.ukGoogle Scholar
Center for Health Leadership and Practice [Internet]. Mentoring Guide: a guide for mentors. [cited 2018 Apr 2]. Available from: https://www.healthleadership.org/Google Scholar
Flinders University Primary Health Care Research Information Service (PHCRIS) [Internet]. Mentoring matters. [cited 2018 Apr 7]. Available from: https://dspace.flinders.edu.au/xmlui/bitstream/handle/2328/36331/factsheet_mentoring.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, S, Hartman, L, Fellin, M. A systematic review of mentorship programs to facilitate transition to post-secondary education and employment for youth and young adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:1329–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvard University [Internet]. The Center for Public Service and Engaged Scholarship at Harvard College. [cited 2018 Mar 10]. Available from: https://publicservice.fas.harvard.edu/Google Scholar
Victorian Institute of Teaching [Internet]. Effective mentoring program. [cited 2018 Apr 12]. Available from: https://www.vit.vic.edu.au/registered-teacher/how-to-train-as-a-teacher-mentorGoogle Scholar
Postgraduate Medical Council of Victoria [Internet]. Mentor training handbook. [cited 2018 Apr 12]. Available from: https://www.pmcv.com.au/computer-matching-service/resources/1334-participant-handbook-for-mentor-training/fileGoogle Scholar
Meagher, E, Taylor, L, Probsfield, J, Fleming, M. [Internet] Evaluating research mentors working in the area of clinical translational science: a review of the literature. CTS-Clin Tran Sci. 2011;4:353–8. doi:10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00317.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McConney, A, Maor, D. [Internet] The evaluation of a pilot mentoring program for beginner science and mathematics teachers: Summative Project Evaluation Report 2009. Murdoch University. [cited 2018 April 12]. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505169.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fleming, M, House, S, Shewakramani Hanson, V, Yu, L, Garbutt, J, McGee, R, et al. The mentoring competency assessment: validation of a new instrument to evaluate skills of research mentors. Acad Med. 2013;88:1002–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research [Internet]. Mentor Evaluation Form examples. [cited 2018 Apr 12]. Available from: https://mentoringresources.ictr.wisc.edu/EvalTemplatesGoogle Scholar
Berk, R, Berg, J, Mortimer, R, Walton-Moss, B, Yeo, T. Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Acad Med. 2005;80:66–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paglis, L, Green, S, Bauer, T. Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and postdoctoral student outcomes. Res High Educ. 2006;47:451–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villar, A, Strong, M. Is mentoring worth the money? A benefit-cost analysis and five-year rate of return of a comprehensive mentoring program for beginning teachers. ERS Spectrum. 2007;25:1–17.Google Scholar
Be A Mentor [Internet]. Mentoring - a cost-effective intervention. [cited 2018 Apr 7]. Available from: http://beamentor.org/main/aboutmentoring/mentoringcost.aspGoogle Scholar
Nick, J, Delahoyde, T, Del Prato, D, Mitchell, C, Ortiz, J, Ottley, C, et al. Best practices in academic mentoring: a model for excellence. Nurs Res Pract. 2012;9. doi:10.1155/2012/937906Google Scholar
Sherk, J. [Internet]. Best practices for mentoring programs. EMT Group. [cited 2018 Apr 12]. Available from: www.emt.org/userfiles/BestPractices.pdfGoogle Scholar
The National Mentoring Partnership [Internet]. Elements of effective practice for mentoring 2015. [cited 2021 July 4]. Available from: https://www.mentoring.org/resource/elements-of-effective-practice-for-mentoring/Google Scholar