Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Arthroplasty registers: A review of international experiences

  • Victoria Serra-Sutton (a1), Alejandro Allepuz (a1), Mireia Espallargues (a1), Gerold Labek (a2) and Joan M. V. Pons (a1)...

Objectives: Registers have proven to be a valuable instrument in the evaluation of arthroplasty procedures and the performance of implants. The aim of this study was to describe the structure, functioning, and content of arthroplasty registers in Europe and other parts of the world.

Methods: A search of technical reports was carried out through the Internet and in Medline/PubMed. The exhaustiveness of the information was confirmed using the links to Web pages of other registers and contacts with key people. Aims, methods in data collection and evaluation, internal structure and organization, participants, validity of the data, and other variables were assessed for each arthroplasty register using a qualitative content analysis of the texts.

Results: Fifteen arthroplasty registers were identified which published sufficient information to conduct a comparative analysis. Eight additional registers were identified but no information was available on the Internet or in English. Most registers were initiatives of an orthopaedic society receiving governmental funding. Data were collected using standardized clinical forms and additional information from clinical-administrative datasets or other registers (mortality, implant costs, hip fractures). The main outcome measure of these registers is survival of the prostheses. Registers use the Internet and their annual reports as the main strategy for the dissemination and feed-back of their results.

Conclusions: Scientific or professional societies and the public health administration should collaborate in the development of arthroplasty registers. To adequately assess the results of observational data information on the structure, the process of arthroplasty interventions and patients characteristics should be collected.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1. A Aamodt , L Nordsletten , LI Havelin , Documentation of hip prostheses used in Norway. A critical review of the literature from 1996–2000. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:663676.

3. AJ Arthursson , O Furnes , B Espehaug , LI Havelin , JA Soreide . Validation of data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Patient Register. 5134 primary total hip arthroplasties and revisions operated at a single hospital between 1987 and 2003. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:823828.

5. DJ Berry , M Kessler , BF Morrey . Maintaining a hip registry for 25 years. Mayo Clinic experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;344:6168.

6. HA Bischoff-Ferrari , EA Lingard , E Losina , . Psychosocial and geriatric correlates of functional status after total hip replacement. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:829835.

7. AE Buckwalter , JJ Callaghan , SS Liu , Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved femoral cementing techniques. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty-five years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:14811485.

13. B Espehaug , O Furnes , LI Havelin , Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:4956.

17. P Herberts , H Malchau . Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement. A review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:111121.

26. H Merx , K Dreinhöfer , P Schräder , International variations in hip replacement rates. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:222226.

35. AB Pedersen , SP Johnsen , S Overgaard , Registration of the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Completeness of total hip arthroplasties and positive predictive value of registered diagnosis and postoperative complications. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:434441.

37. TJ Puolakka , KJJ Pajamaki , PJ Halonen , The Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Report of the hip register. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72:433441.

42. N Shervin , HE Rubash , JN Katz . Orthopeadic procedure volume and patient outcomes: A systematic literature review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;457:3541.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 15 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 204 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.