Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 24
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Kontekakis, Antonis Berghaus, Mareike Gaiser, Sebastian and Kühn, Klaus-Dietter 2014. Biofunctional Surface Engineering.

    Zhu, Mark Ravi, Saiprasad Frampton, Chris Luey, Chris and Young, Simon 2016. New Zealand Joint Registry data underestimates the rate of prosthetic joint infection. Acta Orthopaedica, Vol. 87, Issue. 4, p. 346.

    Niederländer, Charlotte Wahlster, Philip Kriza, Christine and Kolominsky-Rabas, Peter 2013. Registries of implantable medical devices in Europe. Health Policy, Vol. 113, Issue. 1-2, p. 20.

    Peltola, Mikko Malmivaara, Antti and Paavola, Mika 2013. Hip prosthesis introduction and early revision risk. Acta Orthopaedica, Vol. 84, Issue. 1, p. 25.

    Boyer, P. Boutron, I. and Ravaud, P. 2011. Scientific production and impact of national registers: the example of orthopaedic national registers. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, Vol. 19, Issue. 7, p. 858.

    Allepuz, A. Serra-Sutton, V. Espallargues, M. and Sarria, A. 2009. Artroplastias de cadera y rodilla en el Sistema Nacional de Salud. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Vol. 53, Issue. 5, p. 290.

    Tebe, C. Espallargues, M. Marinelli, M. Martinez, O. Giros, J. and Nardi, J. 2015. Respuesta a la carta «El registro español de artroplastias» de los Dres. M. Fernández Fairén, R. Llopis y A. Rodríguez. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Vol. 59, Issue. 2, p. 134.

    Hossain, Fahad Patel, Shelain and Haddad, Fares Sami 2010. Midterm Assessment of Causes and Results of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, Vol. 468, Issue. 5, p. 1221.

    Montanaro, Lucio Speziale, Pietro Campoccia, Davide Ravaioli, Stefano Cangini, Ilaria Pietrocola, Giampiero Giannini, Sandro and Arciola, Carla Renata 2011. Scenery ofStaphylococcusimplant infections in orthopedics. Future Microbiology, Vol. 6, Issue. 11, p. 1329.

    Kurtz, Steven M. Ong, Kevin L. Lau, Edmund Widmer, Marcel Maravic, Milka Gómez-Barrena, Enrique de Fátima de Pina, Maria Manno, Valerio Torre, Marina Walter, William L. de Steiger, Richard Geesink, Rudolph G. T. Peltola, Mikko and Röder, Christoph 2011. International survey of primary and revision total knee replacement. International Orthopaedics, Vol. 35, Issue. 12, p. 1783.

    Tebe, C. Espallargues, M. Marinelli, M. Martinez, O. Giros, J. and Nardi, J. 2015. Response to the letter “Spanish arthoplasty register” from M. Fernández Fairén, R. Llopis and A. Rodríguez. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition), Vol. 59, Issue. 2, p. 134.

    Serra-Sutton, V. Allepuz, A. Martínez, O. and Espallargues, M. 2013. Quality of life-associated factors at one year after total hip and knee replacement: A multicentre study in Catalonia. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition), Vol. 57, Issue. 4, p. 254.

    Rasmussen, Jeppe V. Olsen, Bo S. Fevang, Bjørg-Tilde S. Furnes, Ove Skytta, Eerik T. Rahme, Hans Salomonsson, Björn Mohammed, Khalid D. Page, Richard S. and Carr, Andrew J. 2012. A review of national shoulder and elbow joint replacement registries. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Vol. 21, Issue. 10, p. 1328.

    Di Tanna, Gian Luca Ferro, Salvatore Cipriani, Filippo Bordini, Barbara Stea, Susanna Toni, Aldo Silipo, Federico Pirini, Giampiero and Grilli, Roberto 2011. Modeling the Cost-Effectiveness for Cement-Less and Hybrid Prosthesis in Total Hip Replacement in Emilia Romagna, Italy. Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 169, Issue. 2, p. 227.

    Koh, In Jun Kim, Tae Kyun Chang, Chong Bum Cho, Hyung Joon and In, Yong 2013. Trends in Use of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Korea From 2001 to 2010. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, Vol. 471, Issue. 5, p. 1441.

    Hassenpflug, Joachim and Liebs, Thoralf R. 2014. Register als Werkzeug für mehr Endoprothesensicherheit. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, Vol. 57, Issue. 12, p. 1376.

    Cots, Francesc Chiarello, Pietro Salvador, Xavier and Castells, Xavier 2012. PATIENT CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS AND HOSPITAL COSTS OF CARE FOR KNEE REPLACEMENT IN 10 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES. Health Economics, Vol. 21, p. 116.

    Allepuz, A. Serra-Sutton, V. Martínez, O. Tebé, C. Nardi, J. Portabella, F. and Espallargues, M. 2013. Arthroplasty registers as post-marketing surveillance systems: The Catalan Arthroplasty Register. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition), Vol. 57, Issue. 1, p. 27.

    Serra-Sutton, V. Allepuz, A. Martínez, O. and Espallargues, M. 2013. Factores relacionados con la calidad de vida al año de la artroplastia total de cadera y rodilla: estudio multicéntrico en Cataluña. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Vol. 57, Issue. 4, p. 254.

    Peltola, Mikko Malmivaara, Antti and Paavola, Mika 2012. Introducing a Knee Endoprosthesis Model Increases Risk of Early Revision Surgery. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, Vol. 470, Issue. 6, p. 1711.

  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Volume 25, Issue 1
  • January 2009, pp. 63-72

Arthroplasty registers: A review of international experiences

  • Victoria Serra-Sutton (a1), Alejandro Allepuz (a1), Mireia Espallargues (a1), Gerold Labek (a2) and Joan M. V. Pons (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 January 2009

Objectives: Registers have proven to be a valuable instrument in the evaluation of arthroplasty procedures and the performance of implants. The aim of this study was to describe the structure, functioning, and content of arthroplasty registers in Europe and other parts of the world.

Methods: A search of technical reports was carried out through the Internet and in Medline/PubMed. The exhaustiveness of the information was confirmed using the links to Web pages of other registers and contacts with key people. Aims, methods in data collection and evaluation, internal structure and organization, participants, validity of the data, and other variables were assessed for each arthroplasty register using a qualitative content analysis of the texts.

Results: Fifteen arthroplasty registers were identified which published sufficient information to conduct a comparative analysis. Eight additional registers were identified but no information was available on the Internet or in English. Most registers were initiatives of an orthopaedic society receiving governmental funding. Data were collected using standardized clinical forms and additional information from clinical-administrative datasets or other registers (mortality, implant costs, hip fractures). The main outcome measure of these registers is survival of the prostheses. Registers use the Internet and their annual reports as the main strategy for the dissemination and feed-back of their results.

Conclusions: Scientific or professional societies and the public health administration should collaborate in the development of arthroplasty registers. To adequately assess the results of observational data information on the structure, the process of arthroplasty interventions and patients characteristics should be collected.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1.A Aamodt , L Nordsletten , LI Havelin , Documentation of hip prostheses used in Norway. A critical review of the literature from 1996–2000. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:663676.

3.AJ Arthursson , O Furnes , B Espehaug , LI Havelin , JA Soreide . Validation of data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Patient Register. 5134 primary total hip arthroplasties and revisions operated at a single hospital between 1987 and 2003. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:823828.

5.DJ Berry , M Kessler , BF Morrey . Maintaining a hip registry for 25 years. Mayo Clinic experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;344:6168.

6.HA Bischoff-Ferrari , EA Lingard , E Losina , . Psychosocial and geriatric correlates of functional status after total hip replacement. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51:829835.

7.AE Buckwalter , JJ Callaghan , SS Liu , Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved femoral cementing techniques. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty-five years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:14811485.

13.B Espehaug , O Furnes , LI Havelin , Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:4956.

17.P Herberts , H Malchau . Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement. A review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:111121.

26.H Merx , K Dreinhöfer , P Schräder , International variations in hip replacement rates. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:222226.

35.AB Pedersen , SP Johnsen , S Overgaard , Registration of the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Completeness of total hip arthroplasties and positive predictive value of registered diagnosis and postoperative complications. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:434441.

37.TJ Puolakka , KJJ Pajamaki , PJ Halonen , The Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Report of the hip register. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72:433441.

42.N Shervin , HE Rubash , JN Katz . Orthopeadic procedure volume and patient outcomes: A systematic literature review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;457:3541.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *