Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Cost-effectiveness of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A systematic review

  • Yvonne C. Jonk (a1), Robert L. Kane (a2), Frank A. Lederle (a1), Roderick MacDonald (a3), Andrea H. Cutting (a3) and Timothy J. Wilt (a1)...
Abstract

Objectives: A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair was conducted. Although open surgery has been considered the gold standard for prevention of AAA rupture, emerging less-invasive endovascular treatments have led to increased interest in evaluating the cost and cost-effectiveness of treatment options.

Methods: A systematic review of studies published in MEDLINE between 1999 and 2005 reporting the cost and/or cost-effectiveness of endovascular and/or open surgical repair of nonruptured AAAs was conducted. Case series studies with less than fifty patients per treatment were excluded.

Results: Of twenty eligible articles, three were randomized controlled trials, twelve case series, four Markov models, and one systematic review. Regardless of time frame, all studies found that endovascular repair costs more than open surgery. Although the high cost of the endovascular prosthesis was partially offset by reduced intensive care, hospital length of stay, operating time, blood transfusions, and perioperative complications, hospital costs were still greater for endovascular than open surgical repair. For patients medically fit for open surgery, mid-term costs were greater for endovascular repair with no difference in overall survival or quality of life. For patients medically unfit for open surgery, endovascular repair costs more than no intervention with no difference in survival.

Conclusions: Although conclusions regarding the cost-effectiveness of AAA treatment options are time dependent and vary by institutional perspective, from a societal perspective, endovascular repair is not currently cost-effective for patients with large AAA regardless of medical fitness.

Copyright
References
Hide All
1.Angle, N, Dorafshar, AH, Moore, WS et al. , Open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: What does each really cost? Ann Vasc Surg. 2004; 18: 612618.
2.Anonymous; for the UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Health service costs and quality of life for early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Lancet. 1998; 352: 16561660.
3.Berman, SS, Gentile, AT, Berens, ES et al. , Institutional economic losses associated with AAA repair are independent of technique. J Endovasc Ther. 2002; 9: 282288.
4.Bertges, DJ, Zwolak, RM, Deaton, DH et al. , Current hospital costs and Medicare reimbursement for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2003; 37: 272279.
5.Bosch, JL, Kaufman, JA, Beinfeld, MT et al. , Abdominal aortic aneurysms: Cost-effectiveness of elective endovascular and open surgical repair. Radiology. 2002; 225: 337344.
6.Bosch, JL, Lester, JS, McMahon, PM et al. , Hospital costs for elective endovascular and surgical repairs of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Radiology. 2001; 220: 492497.
7.Brewster, DC, Geller, SC, Kaufman, JA et al. , Initial experience with endovascular aneurysm repair: Comparison of early results with outcome of conventional open repair. J Vasc Surg. 1998; 27: 9921005.
8.Brox, AC, Filion, KB, Zhang, X et al. , In-hospital cost of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Canada and the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 25002504.
9.Bush, RL, Najibi, S, Lin, PH et al. , Conservatism and new technology: The impact on abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Am Surg. 2002; 68: 5760.
10.Clair, DG, Gray, B, O'Hara, P J, Ouriel, K. An evaluation of the costs to health care institutions of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2000; 32: 148152.
11.Dorffner, R, Thurnher, S, Polterauer, P, Kretschmer, G, Lammer, J. Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms with transfemoral placement of stent-grafts: Complications and secondary radiologic intervention. Radiology. 1997; 204: 7986.
12.Drummond, MF, Sculpher, M. Common methodological flaws in economic evaluations. Med Care. 2005; 43 (Suppl): 514.
13.Dryjski, M, O'Brien-Irr, MS, Hassett, J. Hospital costs for endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Am Coll Surg. 2003; 197: 6470.
14.EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): Randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 365: 21792186.
15.EVAR, trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): Randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 365: 21872192.
16.Gillum, RF. Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm in the United States. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995; 48: 12891298.
17.Gold, MRSiegel, JERussell, LBWeinstein, MC, eds. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
18.Hayter, CL, Bradshaw, SR, Allen, RJ, Guduguntla, M, Hardman, DT. Follow-up costs increase the cost disparity between endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2005; 42: 912918.
19.Hirsch, AT, Haskal, ZJ, Hertzer, NR et al. , ACC/AHA 2005 guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): Executive summary a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease) endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 12391312.
20.Huber, TS, Wang, JG, Derrow, AE et al. , Experience in the United States with intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2001; 33: 304310.
21.Lawrence, PF, Gazak, C, Bhirangi, L et al. , The epidemiology of surgically repaired aneurysms in the United States. J Vasc Surg. 1999; 30: 632640.
22.Lederle, FA, Johnson, GR, Wilson, SE et al. , Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair. JAMA. 2002; 287: 29682972.
23.Lee, WA, Carter, JW, Upchurch, G, Seeger, JM, Huber, TS. Perioperative outcomes after open and endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States during 2001. J Vasc Surg. 2004; 39: 491496.
24.Lester, JS, Bosch, JL, Kaufman, JA, Halpern, EF, Gazelle, GS. Inpatient costs of routine endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Acad Radiol. 2001; 8: 639646.
25.Lucas, FL, Stukel, TA, Morris, AM, Siewers, AE, Birkmeyer, JD. Race and surgical mortality in the United States. Ann Surg. 2006; 243: 281286.
26.Maher, MM, McNamara, AM, MacEneaney, PM, Sheehan, SJ, Malone, DE. Abdominal aortic aneurysms: Elective endovascular repair versus conventional surgery–evaluation with evidence-based medicine techniques. Radiology. 2003; 228: 647658.
27.Meenan, RT, Fleming, C, Whitlock, EP, Beil, TL, Smith, P. 2005. Cost-effectiveness analyses of population-based screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. 2005 Feb. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf05/aaascr/aaacost.htm. Accessed December
28.Michaels, JA, Drury, D, Thomas, SM. Cost-effectiveness of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2005; 92: 960967.
29.Patel, ST, Haser, PB, Bush, HL Jr, Kent, KC. The cost-effectiveness of endovascular repair versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A decision analysis model. J Vasc Surg. 1999; 29: 958972.
30.Prinssen, M, Wixon, CL, Buskens, E et al. , Surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair: Diagnostics, complications, and associated costs. Ann Vasc Surg. 2004; 18: 421427.
31.Reed, SD, Anstrom, KJ, Bakhai, A et al. , Conducting economic evaluations alongside multinational clinical trials: Toward a research consensus. Am Heart J. 2005; 149: 434443.
32.Schermerhorn, ML, Birkmeyer, JD, Gould, DA, Cronenwett, JL. Cost-effectiveness of surgery for small abdominal aortic aneurysms on the basis of data from the United Kingdom small aneurysm trial. J Vasc Surg. 2000; 31: 217226.
33.Sternbergh, WC III, Money, SR. Hospital cost of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: A multicenter study. J Vasc Surg. 2000; 31: 237244.
34.Treiman, GS, Lawrence, PF, Edwards, WH Jr et al. , An assessment of the current applicability of the EVT endovascular graft for treatment of patients with an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 1999; 30: 6875.
35.Weinstein, MC, Siegel, JE, Gold, MR, Kamlet, MS, Russell, LB. Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA. 1996; 276: 12531258.
36.Wilt, TJ, Lederle, FA, MacDonald, R et al. , Comparison of endovascular and open surgical repairs for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 144 (Prepared by the Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0009.) AHRQ Publication No. 06-E017. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; August 2006.
37.Zierler, BK, Gray, DT. The principles of cost-effectiveness analysis and their application. J Vasc Surg. 2003; 37: 226234.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed