Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Woolf, Steven H.
2000.
The Best Screening Test for Colorectal Cancer — A Personal Choice.
New England Journal of Medicine,
Vol. 343,
Issue. 22,
p.
1641.
Vijan, Sandeep
Hwang, Erica W
Hofer, Timothy P
and
Hayward, Rodney A
2001.
Which colon cancer screening test? A comparison of costs, effectiveness, and compliance.
The American Journal of Medicine,
Vol. 111,
Issue. 8,
p.
593.
Saha, Somnath
Hoerger, Thomas J
Pignone, Michael P
Teutsch, Steven M
Helfand, Mark
and
Mandelblatt, Jeanne S
2001.
The art and science of incorporating cost effectiveness into evidence-based recommendations for clinical preventive services.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 3,
p.
36.
Selby, Joe V
2001.
Screening for colorectal cancer—the patient and the population.
The American Journal of Medicine,
Vol. 111,
Issue. 8,
p.
662.
Holmes‐Rovner, Margaret
Williams, Gilbert A.
Hoppough, Susan
Quillan, Lisa
Butler, Rishan
and
Given, C. William
2002.
Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers in Persons with Low Income.
Cancer Practice,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 5,
p.
240.
Whynes, D.K.
2002.
The economic case for faecal occult blood screening.
Annals of Oncology,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 12,
p.
1953.
Klabunde, Carrie N.
Jones, Elizabeth
Brown, Martin L.
and
Davis, William W.
2002.
Colorectal Cancer Screening with Double-Contrast Barium Enema: A National Survey of Diagnostic Radiologists.
American Journal of Roentgenology,
Vol. 179,
Issue. 6,
p.
1419.
Schoen, Robert E.
2002.
The case for population-based screening for colorectal cancer.
Nature Reviews Cancer,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 1,
p.
65.
Pignone, Michael
Saha, Somnath
Hoerger, Tom
and
Mandelblatt, Jeanne
2002.
Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Colorectal Cancer Screening.
Annals of Internal Medicine,
Vol. 137,
Issue. 2,
p.
96.
Provenzale, Dawn
2002.
Cost-Effectiveness of Screening the Average-Risk Population for Colorectal Cancer.
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
p.
93.
Provenzale, Dawn
Gray, Rebecca N.
Fisher, Deborah A.
and
Schmidt, Troy
2002.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES IN COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING AND TREATMENT.
Evidence-Based Gastroenterology,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 1,
p.
12.
Walsh, Judith M. E.
and
Terdiman, Jonathan P.
2003.
Colorectal Cancer Screening.
JAMA,
Vol. 289,
Issue. 10,
p.
1297.
Inadomi, John M.
2003.
Update on the cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal neoplasia.
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
44.
Inadomi, John M
and
Sonnenberg, Amnon
2003.
An evidence-based medicine approach to economic studies: assessing the cost-effectiveness of competing strategies for colorectal cancer screening.
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 5,
p.
404.
O’Brien, Kevin
Sweeney, Brian F
Conger, Nicholas
Fischer, Joseph R
and
Lang, Kevin A
2003.
Prevalence of proximal adenomas after an adenoma is found on flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Cancer Detection and Prevention,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 4,
p.
259.
Lieberman, David
2003.
Colonoscopy.
p.
131.
Boer, Rob
Plevritis, Sylvia
and
Clarke, Lauren
2004.
Diversity of model approaches for breast cancer screening: a review of model assumptions by The Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Network (CISNET) Breast Cancer Groups.
Statistical Methods in Medical Research,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 6,
p.
525.
Brouse, Corey H.
Basch, Charles E.
Wolf, Randi L.
and
Shmukler, Celia
2004.
Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in a low income, urban population: a descriptive study.
Health Education,
Vol. 104,
Issue. 2,
p.
68.
Stone, Christine A.
Carter, Robert C.
Vos, Theo
and
John, James St
2004.
Colorectal cancer screening in Australia: An economic evaluation of a potential biennial screening program using faecal occult blood tests.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 2,
p.
273.
Biasco, G.
and
Hakim, Rossella
2004.
La surveillance coloscopique classique de la colite ulcéreuse (CU) en vaut-elle la peine ?.
Acta Endoscopica,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 2,
p.
179.