Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. http://handbook.cochrane.org/ (accessed September 7, 2016).
Popay, J, Rogers, A, Williams, G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res. 1998;8:341–351.
Morton, S, Levit, L, Berg, A, Eden, J. Finding what works in health care: Standards for systematic reviews. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
Schünemann, HJ, Moja, L. Reviews: Rapid! rapid! rapid!. . . and systematic. Syst Rev.
Bero, L, Busuttil, G, Farquhar, C, et al.
Measuring the performance of the Cochrane library. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:Ed000048.
Pai, M, McCulloch, M, Gorman, JD, et al.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: An illustrated, step-by-step guide. Natl Med J India. 2004;17:86–95.
Hailey, DM. The influence of technology assessments by advisory bodies on health policy and practice. Health Policy. 1993;25:243–254.
Ganann, R, Ciliska, D, Thomas, H. Expediting systematic reviews: Methods and implications of rapid reviews. Implement Sci. 2010;5:56.
Harker, J, Kleijnen, J. What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in health technology assessments. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2012;10:397–410.
Khangura, S, Konnyu, K, Cushman, R, Grimshaw, J, Moher, D. Evidence summaries: The evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev. 2012;1:10.
Hartling, L, Guise, JM, Kato, E, et al.
AHRQ comparative effectiveness reviews. EPC methods: An exploration of methods and context for the production of rapid reviews. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2015.
Featherstone, RM, Dryden, DM, Foisy, M, et al.
Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: An analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews. Syst Rev. 2015;4:50.
Hartling, L, Chisholm, A, Thomson, D, Dryden, DM. A descriptive analysis of overviews of reviews published between 2000 and 2011. PLoS One. 2012;7:e49667.
Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, Altman, DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.
Shamseer, L, Moher, D, Clarke, M, et al.
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.
Tricco, AC, Antony, J, Zarin, W, et al.
A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Med. 2015;13:224.
Kamel, C, Mann, J. Rapid evidence reviews: The CADTH experience [Poster]. International Cochrane Colloquium, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. [Internet] 2013.
Khangura, S, Polisena, J, Clifford, TJ, Farrah, K, Kamel, C. Rapid review: An emerging approach to evidence synthesis in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014;30:20–27.
Watt, A, Cameron, A, Sturm, L, et al.
Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:133–139.
Watt, A, Cameron, A, Sturm, L, et al.
Rapid versus full systematic reviews: Validity in clinical practice?
ANZ J Surg. 2008;78:1037–1040.
Abrami, PC, Borokhovski, E, Bernard, RM, et al.
Issues in conducting and disseminating brief reviews of evidence. Evid Policy. 2010;6:371–389.
Polisena, J, Garritty, C, Kamel, C, Stevens, A, Abou-Setta, AM. Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making: A descriptive analysis of processes and methods. Syst Rev. 2015;4:26.
Merlin, T, Tamblyn, D, Ellery, B. What's in a name? Developing definitons for common health technology assessment product types of the International Network of Agencies for Health technology Assessment (INAHTA). Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014;30:430–437.
Boulkedid, R, Abdoul, H, Loustau, M, Sibony, O, Alberti, C. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20476.
Lilja, KK, Laakso, K, Palomki, J, eds. Using the Delphi method. Technology management in the energy smart world (PICMET), pp. 1-10. IEEE CS 2011.
Okoli, C, Pawlowski, SD. The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Inf Manage. 2004;42:15–29.
Heiko, A. Consensus measurement in Delphi studies. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2012;8:1525–1536.
Thangaratinam, S, Shakila, Redman CWE. The Delphi technique. Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;7:120–125.
Hsu, CC, Sandford, BA. The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007;12:1–8.
Hasson, F, Keeney, S, McKenna, H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:1008–1015.
McKenna, HP. The Delphi technique: A worthwhile research approach for nursing?
J Adv Nurs. 1994;19:1221–1225.
NVivo. Version 10. Copyright QSR International Pty Ltd; 2014.
Hailey, D, Corabian, P, Harstall, C, Schneider, W. The use and impact of rapid health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:651–656.
Coates, V. Keynote address: Rapid reviews and their impact on future directions for health technology assessment. Vancouver, BC: CADTH Rapid Reviews Summit; [Internet] February 2015.
Sandelowski, M. Reading, writing and systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2008;64:104–110.
Shamseer, L, Moher, D. Planning a systematic review? Think protocols (Web Blog Commentary). BioMed Central Blog. January 5, 2015.
Systematic Reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. University of York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; January 2009.
Campbell, DT, Stanley, JC. Experimental and quasiexperimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally; 1963.