Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Robra, B.-P. 2014. John E. Wennberg, Pionier der regionalen Versorgungsforschung. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, Vol. 57, Issue. 2, p. 164.

    Schang, Laura Morton, Alec DaSilva, Philip and Bevan, Gwyn 2014. From data to decisions? Exploring how healthcare payers respond to the NHS Atlas of Variation in Healthcare in England. Health Policy, Vol. 114, Issue. 1, p. 79.

    Campillo-Artero, Carlos and Bernal-Delgado, Enrique 2013. Reinversión en sanidad: fundamentos, aclaraciones, experiencias y perspectivas. Gaceta Sanitaria, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 175.

    Doessel, D. P. Tonmukayakul, Utsana and Williams, Ruth F. G. 2011. Quantifying the Economic Structure of the Australian Mental Health Sector Since 1992-93. International Journal of Mental Health, Vol. 40, Issue. 2, p. 25.

    Gérvas, Juan and Pérez Fernández, Mercedes 2011. Rebajas sanitarias racionales en tiempos de crisis económica. FMC - Formación Médica Continuada en Atención Primaria, Vol. 18, Issue. 10, p. 615.

  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Volume 24, Issue 3
  • July 2008, pp. 282-293

Economic analysis of medical practice variation between 1991 and 2000: The impact of patient outcomes research teams (PORTs)

  • Stephen T. Parente (a1), Charles E. Phelps (a2) and Patrick J. O'Connor (a3)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 July 2008

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of the multi-hundred million dollar investment by the federal government in the developing Patient Outcomes Research Teams (PORTs) in over a dozen major academic medical centers in the United States throughout the 1990s. The objective of the PORTs was to reduce unnecessary clinical variation in medical treatment.

Methods: Using an economic derivation of welfare loss attributable to medical practice variation and hospital admission claims data for 2 million elderly patients generalizable to the nation, we estimate the change in welfare between 1991 and 2000, the period within which the PORTs were designed and executed and their results disseminated.

Results: Our results show inpatient admission types targeted by the PORTs did have less welfare loss relative to their total expenditure by 2000, but that there was not a net decrease in the welfare loss for all hospital admissions affected by the PORT.

Conclusions: We conclude that PORTs may have had favorable effects on welfare, most likely by reducing variation in clinical care, but that causality cannot be proved, and the effects were not equal across all conditions targeted by PORTs. This research provides a methodological template that may be used to evaluate the impact of patient safety research on welfare loss and on variation in medical treatment in both hospital and ambulatory settings.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1.EB Bass , HA Pitt , KD Lillemoe . Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1993;165:466471.

4.P Diehr , D Grembowski . A small area simulation approach to determining excess variation in dental procedure rates. Am J Public Health. 1990;80:13431348.

6.JJ Escarce , BS Bloom , AL Hillman , JA Shea , JS Schwartz . Diffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy among general surgeons in the United States. Med Care. 1995;33:256271.

7.D Freund , J Lave , C Clancy , Patient outcomes research teams: Contribution to outcomes and effectiveness research. Annu Rev Public Health. 1999;20:337359.

12.P Paul-Shaheen , JD Clark , D Williams . Small area analysis: A review and analysis of the North American literature. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1987;12:741809.

14.CE Phelps , ST Parente . Priority setting in medical technology and medical practice assessment. Med Care. 1990;28:703723.

15.CE Phelps , C Mooney . Priority setting in medical technology and medical practice assessment: Correction and update. Med Care. 1992;30:744751.

16.JE Wennberg . Dealing with medical practice variations: A proposal for action. Health Aff (Millwood). 1984;3:632.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *