Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 19
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Aguirre-Bermeo, H. Tomasa, T. Navas, A. Xirgu, J. Catalán-Ibars, R.M. Morillas, J. Cuartero, M. Manciño, J.M. and Roglán, A. 2015. Utilización de las terapias de depuración extracorpórea en los Servicios de Medicina Intensiva de Cataluña (España). Medicina Intensiva, Vol. 39, Issue. 5, p. 272.

    Jacobs, Frederic M 2015. Early mobilization on continuous renal replacement therapy is safe and may improve filter life. Critical Care, Vol. 19, Issue. 1,

    Kitchlu, Abhijat Adhikari, Neill Burns, Karen E. A. Friedrich, Jan O. Garg, Amit X. Klein, David Richardson, Robert M. and Wald, Ron 2015. Outcomes of sustained low efficiency dialysis versus continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill adults with acute kidney injury: a cohort study. BMC Nephrology, Vol. 16, Issue. 1,

    Thongprayoon, Charat Cheungpasitporn, Wisit and Ahmed, Adil H. 2015. Trends in the use of renal replacement therapy modality in intensive care unit: a 7 year study. Renal Failure, Vol. 37, Issue. 9, p. 1444.

    Burgers, L.T. Nauta, S.T. Deckers, J.W. Severens, J.L. and Redekop, W.K. 2014. Is it cost-effective to use a test to decide which individuals with an intermediate cardiovascular disease risk would benefit from statin treatment?. International Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 176, Issue. 3, p. 980.

    Christie, Emily and Pannu, Neesh 2014. Dialysis and Acute Kidney Injury: Current Evidence. Seminars in Dialysis, Vol. 27, Issue. 2, p. 154.

    Wald, Ron Shariff, Salimah Z. Adhikari, Neill K. J. Bagshaw, Sean M. Burns, Karen E. A. Friedrich, Jan O. Garg, Amit X. Harel, Ziv Kitchlu, Abhijat and Ray, Joel G. 2014. The Association Between Renal Replacement Therapy Modality and Long-Term Outcomes Among Critically Ill Adults With Acute Kidney Injury. Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 42, Issue. 4, p. 868.

    Yasuda, Hideto Uchino, Shigehiko Uji, Makiko Ohnuma, Tetsu Namba, Yoshitomo Katayama, Shinshu Kawarazaki, Hiroo Toki, Noriyoshi Takeda, Kenta Izawa, Junichi Tokuhira, Natsuko and Nagata, Isao 2014. The lower limit of intensity to control uremia during continuous renal replacement therapy. Critical Care, Vol. 18, Issue. 5,

    Smith, Orla M Wald, Ron Adhikari, Neill KJ Pope, Karen Weir, Matthew A and Bagshaw, Sean M 2013. Standard versus accelerated initiation of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury (STARRT-AKI): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 320.

    De Smedt, D. M. Elseviers, M. M. Lins, R. L. and Annemans, L. 2012. Economic evaluation of different treatment modalities in acute kidney injury. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol. 27, Issue. 11, p. 4095.

    Heringlake, Matthias Schön, Julika and Paarmann, Hauke 2012. Sustained low-efficiency dialysis in surgical acute kidney injury - really useful?. Critical Care, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 407.

    Parikh, Amay and Shaw, Andrew 2012. The Economics of Renal Failure and Kidney Disease in Critically Ill Patients. Critical Care Clinics, Vol. 28, Issue. 1, p. 99.

    Schwenger, Vedat Weigand, Markus A Hoffmann, Oskar Dikow, Ralf Kihm, Lars P Seckinger, Jörg Miftari, Nexhat Schaier, Matthias Hofer, Stefan Haar, Caroline Nawroth, Peter P Zeier, Martin Martin, Eike and Morath, Christian 2012. Sustained low efficiency dialysis using a single-pass batch system in acute kidney injury - a randomized interventional trial: the REnal Replacement Therapy Study in Intensive Care Unit PatiEnts. Critical Care, Vol. 16, Issue. 4, p. R140.

    2012. References. Kidney International Supplements, Vol. 2, Issue. 1, p. 124.

    2012. Section 5: Dialysis Interventions for Treatment of AKI. Kidney International Supplements, Vol. 2, Issue. 1, p. 89.

    Claure-Del Granado, Rolando and Mehta, Ravindra L. 2011. Withholding and Withdrawing Renal Support in Acute Kidney Injury. Seminars in Dialysis, Vol. 24, Issue. 2, p. 208.

    James, Matthew T. and Tonelli, Marcello 2011. Financial Aspects of Renal Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury. Seminars in Dialysis, Vol. 24, Issue. 2, p. 215.

    Fieghen, Heather E Friedrich, Jan O Burns, Karen E Nisenbaum, Rosane Adhikari, Neill K Hladunewich, Michelle A Lapinsky, Stephen E Richardson, Robert M and Wald, Ron 2010. The hemodynamic tolerability and feasibility of sustained low efficiency dialysis in the management of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. BMC Nephrology, Vol. 11, Issue. 1,

    Prowle, John R. and Bellomo, Rinaldo 2010. Continuous renal replacement therapy: recent advances and future research. Nature Reviews Nephrology, Vol. 6, Issue. 9, p. 521.

  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Volume 25, Issue 3
  • July 2009, pp. 331-338

Economic evaluation of continuous renal replacement therapy in acute renal failure

  • Scott Klarenbach (a1), Braden Manns (a2), Neesh Pannu (a1), Fiona M. Clement (a2), Natasha Wiebe (a1) and Marcello Tonelli (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 July 2009

Objectives: Controversy exists regarding the optimal method of providing dialysis in critically ill patients with acute renal failure. We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies.

Methods: Adult subjects requiring renal replacement therapy in a critical care setting who are candidates for intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) or continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were considered within a Markov model. Alternative strategies including IHD, and standard or high dose CRRT were compared. The model considered relevant clinical and economic outcomes, and incorporated data on clinical effectiveness from a recent systematic review and high quality micro-costing data.

Results: In the base-case analysis, CRRT was associated with similar health outcomes but higher costs by ($3,679 more than IHD per patient). In scenarios considering alternate cost sources, and higher intensity of IHD (including daily and longer duration IHD), CRRT remained more costly. Sensitivity analysis indicated that even small differences in the risk of mortality or need for long-term chronic dialysis therapy among surviving patients benefits led to dramatic changes in the cost-effectiveness of the modalities considered.

Conclusions: Given the higher costs of providing CRRT and absence of demonstrated benefit, IHD is the preferred modality in critically ill patients who are candidates for either IHD or CRRT, although this conclusion should be revisited if future clinical trials establish differences in clinical effectiveness between modalities. Future interventions that are proven to improve renal recovery after acute renal failure are likely to be cost-effective, even if very resource intensive.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1.SM Bagshaw , LR Berthiaume , A Delaney , R Bellomo . Continuous versus intermittent renal replacement therapy for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: A meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:610617.

2.SM Bagshaw , KB Laupland , CJ Doig , Prognosis for long-term survival and renal recovery in critically ill patients with severe acute renal failure: A population-based study. Crit Care. 2005;9:R700R709.

3.AN Berbece , RM Richardson . Sustained low-efficiency dialysis in the ICU: Cost, anticoagulation, and solute removal. Kidney Int. 2006;70:963968.

4.AH Briggs , R Goeree , G Blackhouse , BJ O'Brien . Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: Choosing between treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Med Decis Making. 2002;22:290308.

6.K Claxton , M Sculpher , C McCabe , Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for nice technology assessment: Not an optional extra. Health Econ. 2005;14:339347.

8.MB Hamel , RS Phillips , RB Davis , Outcomes and cost-effectiveness of initiating dialysis and continuing aggressive care in seriously ill hospitalized adults. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:195202.

9.A Laupacis , P Keown , N Plus , A study of the quality of life and cost-utility of renal transplantation. Kidney Int. 1996;50:235242.

10.H Lee , B Manns , K Taub , Cost analysis of ongoing care of patients with end-stage renal disease: The impact of dialysis modality and dialysis access. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;40:611622.

11.B Manns , JA Johnson , K Taub , G Mortis , WA Ghali , C Donaldson . Quality of life in patients treated with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis: What are the important determinants? Clin Nephrol. 2003;60:341351.

12.B Manns , CJ Doig , H Lee , Cost of acute renal failure requiring dialysis in the intensive care unit: Clinical and resource implications of renal recovery. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:449455.

13.C McCabe , S Dixon . Testing the validity of cost-effectiveness models. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;17:501513.

14.RL Mehta , GM Chertow . In critically ill patients with acute renal failure, outcomes, not dollars, should drive modality choice. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:644646.

15.RL Mehta , B McDonald , FB Gabbai , A randomized clinical trial of continuous versus intermittent dialysis for acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 2001;60:11541163.

16.TW Noseworthy , E Konopad , A Shustack , R Johnston , M Grace . Cost accounting of adult intensive care: Methods and human and capital inputs. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:11681172.

18.N Pannu , S Klarenbach , N Wiebe , Renal replacement therapy in patients with acute renal failure: A systematic review. JAMA. 2008;299:793805.

19.C Vinsonneau , C Camus , A Combes , Continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration versus intermittent haemodialysis for acute renal failure in patients with multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome: A multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2006;368:379385.

21.MC Weinstein , B O'Brien , J Hornberger , Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices–Modeling Studies. Value Health. 2003;6:917.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *