Skip to main content
×
×
Home

EFFECTS OF INTERPERSONAL TRUST AMONG USERS OF ONLINE HEALTH COMMUNITIES ON PATIENT TRUST IN AND SATISFACTION WITH THEIR PHYSICIAN

  • Anne-Françoise Audrain-Pontevia (a1) and Loick Menvielle (a2)
Abstract

Objectives: Online Health Communities (OHCs) are increasingly being used by patients in the Web 2.0 era. Today's patients have instant access to a great deal of medical information and contacts. Despite the considerable development of OHCs, little is known regarding the impact on the patient–physician relationship. This research aims at filling this gap and examines how interpersonal trust on peer-to-peer OHCs influences two key relational variables, namely patient trust in the physician and patient satisfaction with the physician. It also investigates their influences on the patient's attitude toward the physician.

Methods: Drawing on both the relational and medical literatures, we propose a research model that brings out the relationships between interpersonal trust in OHCs, and patients’ trust, satisfaction and attitude toward the physician. We then conduct a quantitative survey of 512 OHC users in France, using structural equation modeling to test our hypotheses.

Results: Our findings indicate that interpersonal trust in OHCs exerts a positive influence on both patients’ trust in and satisfaction with their physician. It also highlights that these two relational variables have a positive influence on patient attitude toward the physician. Our findings also indicate that patient trust influences patient satisfaction with the physician.

Conclusions: This research highlights the importance of OHCs, which can be seen as valuable instruments for enhancing patient–physician relationships. It shows that healthcare managers should seek to enhance interpersonal trust among OHC users, because this trust has a positive influence on patient satisfaction with, trust in and attitude toward the physician.

Copyright
References
Hide All
1. Vennik, FD, Adams, SA, Faber, MJ, Putters, K. Expert and experiential knowledge in the same place: Patients’ experiences with online communities connecting patients and health professionals. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;95:265270.
2. Wright, KB. Social support within an on-line cancer community: An assessment of emotional support perceptions of advantages and disadvantages, and motives for using the community from a communication perspective. J Appl Commun Res. 2002;30:195209.
3. van der Eijk, M, Faber, MJ, Aarts, JW, Kremer, JA, Munneke, M, Bloem, BR. Using online health communities to deliver patient-centered care to people with chronic conditions. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15.
4. Fan, H, Smith, SP, Lederman, R, Chang, S. Why people trust in online health communities: An integrated approach. 21st Australasian Conference on Information Systems; 2010.
5. Johnston, AC, Worrell, JL, Di Gangi, PM, Wasko, M. Online health communities: An assessment of the influence of participation on patient empowerment outcomes. Inf Technol People. 2013;26:213235.
6. Audrain-Pontevia, AF, Menvielle, L. Do online health communities enhance patient-physician relationship? An assessment of the impact of social support and patient empowerment. Health Serv Manage Res, 2017:951484817748462.
7. Griffith, F, Cave, J, Boardman, F, et al. Social networks - The future for health care delivery. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:22232241.
8. Kanthawala, S, Vermeesch, A, Given, B, Huh, J. Answers to health questions: Internet search results versus online health community responses. J Med Internet Research. 2016;18:e95.
9. Bright, P, Hambli, K, Tamakloe, S. What is the profile of individuals joining the KNEEguru Online Health Community? A cross-sectional mixed-methods study. J Internet Med Res. 2016;18:e84.
10. El Morr, C, Eftychiou, L. Evaluations frameworks for health virtual communities. In: Menvielle, L, Audrain-Pontevia, A-F, Menvielle, W, eds. The Digitization of healthcare. New challenges and opportunities. United Kingdom: Palgrave McMillan; 2017.
11. Leimeister, JM, Ebner, W, Krcmar, H. Design, implementation, and evaluation of trust-supporting components in virtual communities for patients. J Manag Inf Syst. 2005;21:101135.
12. Rindings, CM, Gefen, D, Arize, B. Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. J Strateg Inf Sys. 2002;11:271295.
13. Wald, HS, Dube, CE, Anthony, DC. Untangling the Web: The impact of Internet on health and the physician-patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;68:218224.
14. Street, RL, Makoul, G, Arora, NK, Epstein, RM. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74:295301.
15. Morgan, RM, Hunt, SD. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J Mark. 1994;58:2038.
16. Oliver, RL. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J Mark Res. 1980;17:460469.
17. Wilkie, WL. Consumer behavior, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1994.
18. Ybarra, ML, Suman, M. Help seeking behavior and the Internet: A national survey. Int J Med Inform. 2006;75:2941.
19. Hung, KH, Li, SY, Tse, DK. Interpersonal trust and platform credibility in a Chinese multi-brand online community: Effects on brand variety-seeking and time-spent. J Advert. 2011;40:99112.
20. Doney, PM, Cannon, JP. An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. J Mark. 1997;61:3551.
21. DiMatteo, MR, Hays, RD, Prince, LM. Relationship of physicians' nonverbal communication skill to patient satisfaction, appointment noncompliance, and physician workload. Health Psychol. 1986;5:581594.
22. Murray, E, Lo, E, Pollack, L, et al. The impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: National U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians. J Med Internet Res. 2003;5/3:e17.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Audrain-Pontevia and Menvielle supplementary material
Audrain-Pontevia and Menvielle supplementary material 1

 Word (24 KB)
24 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 64 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 442 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 12th February 2018 - 17th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.