Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

EUnetHTA INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: DEVELOPMENT AND LESSONS LEARNED

  • Patrice X. Chalon (a1) and Peter Kraemer (a2)

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the techniques used in achieving consensus on common standards to be implemented in the EUnetHTA Information Management System (IMS); and to describe how interoperability between tools was explored.

Methods: Three face to face meetings were organized to identify and agree on common standards to the development of online tools. Two tools were created to demonstrate the added value of implementing interoperability standards at local levels. Developers of tools outside EUnetHTA were identified and contacted.

Results: Four common standards have been agreed on by consensus; and consequently all EUnetHTA tools have been modified or designed accordingly. RDF Site Summary (RSS) has demonstrated a good potential to support rapid dissemination of HTA information. Contacts outside EUnetHTA resulted in direct collaboration (HTA glossary, HTAi Vortal), evaluation of options for interoperability between tools (CRD HTA database) or a formal framework to prepare cooperation on concrete projects (INAHTA projects database).

Conclusions: While being entitled a project on IT infrastructure, the work program was also about people. When having to agree on complex topics, fostering a cohesive group dynamic and hosting face to face meetings brings added value and enhances understanding between partners. The adoption of widespread standards enhanced the homogeneity of the EUnetHTA tools and should thus contribute to their wider use, therefore, to the general objective of EUnetHTA. The initiatives on interoperability of systems need to be developed further to support a general interoperable information system that could benefit the whole HTA community.

Copyright

References

Hide All
1. Kristensen, FB. Development of European HTA: From vision to EUnetHTA. Michael. 2012;9:147156.
2. Warmuth, M. EUnetHTA POP db: The EUnetHTA Planned and Ongoing Projects Database, content and use. 9th HTAi Annual Meeting. Bilbao, Spain: HTAi; 2012.
3. Quentin, F, Carbonneil, C, Moty-Monnereau, C, et al. Web-based toolkit to facilitate European collaboration on evidence generation on promising health technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009; 25 (Suppl 2):6874.
4. EUnetHTA Joint Action 1 (2010–2012). http://www.eunethta.eu/activities/eunethta-joint-action-2010-12/eunethta-joint-action-2010-12 (accessed March 4, 2014).
5. Chalon, P, Kraemer, P, EUnetHTA, JA. WP6 Partners. Common standards for EUnetHTA tools. Report. Brussels: EUnetHTA; 2011.
6. DCMI Usage Board. DCMI Metadata Terms. [Webpage] 2010-10-11 [cited 2013–08–29]. http://dublincore.org/documents/2010/10/11/dcmi-terms/ (accessed August 29, 2013).
7. Goedertier, S. SEMIC - Semantic Interoperability Community. [Webpage] 2011–06–01 [cited 2013–08–29]. https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/semic/description (accessed August 29, 2013).
8. Allgurin Neikter, S, EUnetHTA Project WP2. EUnetHTA graphical guide. Copenhagen: EUnetHTA; 2006.
9. Office of Communications and Public Liaison. Medical Subject Headings (MESH®) Fact Sheet. [Webpage] 2012 2012–11–28 [cited 2013 -08–29]. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/mesh.html (accessed August 29, 2013).
10. O’Connor, D, Green, S, Higgins, JP. 5 Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies. In: Higgins, JP, Green, S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. London: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011:8394.
11. HONSelect. [Webpage] 2008–03–05 [cited 2013–08–29]. http://www.hon.ch/HONselect/ (accessed August 29, 2013).
12. Sermersheim, J, Network Working Group. Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): The Protocol. [Webpage] 2006 [cited 2013–08–29]. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4511 (accessed August 29, 2013).
13. Fung-Kee-Fung, M, Boushey, RP, Morash, R. Exploring a “community of practice” methodology as a regional platform for large-scale collaboration in cancer surgery-the Ottawa approach. Curr Oncol. 2014;21:1318.
14. So, H-J, Brush, TA. Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Comput Educ. 2008;51:318336.
15. Kirkman, BL, Rosen, B, Tesluk, PE, Gibson, CB. The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Acad Manage J. 2004;47:175192.
16. Bonk, CJ, Olson, TM, Wisher, RA, Orvis, KL. Learning from focus groups: An examination of blended learning. Int J E-Learn Distance Educ. 2002;17:97118.
17. Powell, RA, Single, HM. Focus groups. Int J Quality Health Care. 1996;8:499504.
18. Lenner, P, Lundgren, E, Damber, L. Clinico-pathologic correlation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. III. Biologic significance of a modified Lukes and Collins classification. Acta Radiol Oncol Radiat Phys Biol. 1979;18:544553.
19. Mancini, F, Sousa, FS, Teixeira, FO, et al. Use of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) in Portuguese for categorizing web-based healthcare content. J Biomed Inform. 2011;44 (2):299309.
20. Pereira, S, Neveol, A, Kerdelhue, G, et al. Using multi-terminology indexing for the assignment of MeSH descriptors to health resources in a French online catalogue. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008:586590.
21. Maggio, LA, Bresnahan, M, Flynn, DB, et al. A case study: Using social tagging to engage students in learning Medical Subject Headings. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97:7783.
22. Nielsen, J. Usability 101: Introduction to usability. 2012–01–04 [cited 2014–03–11]. http://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/ (accessed March 11, 2014).
23. Guegan, E, Cook, A. Internal evaluation report. Southampton: NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre (NETSCC); 2013.
24. Mavergames, C. Introducing the Cochrane Informatics and Knowledge Management Department (IKMD). [Webpage] 2014–02–13 [cited 2014– 03–11]. http://tech.cochrane.org/news/introducing-cochrane-informatics-and-knowledge-management-department-ikmd (accessed March 11, 2014).
25. Chalon, PX. Standards to enhance interoperability of information systems and efficiency of information exchange. 7th HTAi Annual Meeting. Dublin, Ireland; 2010.
26. Jakobsson, A. Establishing an institutional repository: A step by step approach. 10th European Conference of Medical and Health Libraries. Cluj, Romania; 2006.
27. Vlayen, J, Chalon, PX. Searching electronic sources. KCE Process Book [Webpage] 2012 [cited 2013–09–19]. http://processbook.kce.fgov.be/?q=node/14 (accessed September 19, 2013).
28. Straus, S, Tetroe, J, Graham, ID. Knowledge translation in health care: Moving from evidence to practice. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed