Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

FRAMEWORK FOR SYSTEMATIC IDENTIFICATION OF ETHICAL ASPECTS OF HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES: THE SBU APPROACH

  • Emelie Heintz (a1), Laura Lintamo (a2), Monica Hultcrantz (a3), Stella Jacobson (a3), Ragnar Levi (a2), Christian Munthe (a4), Sofia Tranæus (a5), Pernilla Östlund (a6) and Lars Sandman (a7)...

Abstract

Objectives: Assessment of ethical aspects of a technology is an important component of health technology assessment (HTA). Nevertheless, how the implementation of ethical assessment in HTA is to be organized and adapted to specific regulatory and organizational settings remains unclear. The objective of this study is to present a framework for systematic identification of ethical aspects of health technologies. Furthermore, the process of developing and adapting the framework to a specific setting is described.

Methods: The framework was developed based on an inventory of existing approaches to identification and assessment of ethical aspects in HTA. In addition, the framework was adapted to the Swedish legal and organizational healthcare context, to the role of the HTA agency and to the use of non-ethicists. The framework was reviewed by a group of ethicists working in the field as well as by a wider set of interested parties including industry, interest groups, and other potential users.

Results: The framework consists of twelve items with sub-questions, short explanations, and a concluding overall summary. The items are organized into four different themes: the effects of the intervention on health, its compatibility with ethical norms, structural factors with ethical implications, and long term ethical consequences of using the intervention.

Conclusions: In this study, a framework for identifying ethical aspects of health technologies is proposed. The general considerations and methodological approach to this venture will hopefully inspire and present important insights to organizations in other national contexts interested in making similar adaptations.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      FRAMEWORK FOR SYSTEMATIC IDENTIFICATION OF ETHICAL ASPECTS OF HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES: THE SBU APPROACH
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      FRAMEWORK FOR SYSTEMATIC IDENTIFICATION OF ETHICAL ASPECTS OF HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES: THE SBU APPROACH
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      FRAMEWORK FOR SYSTEMATIC IDENTIFICATION OF ETHICAL ASPECTS OF HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES: THE SBU APPROACH
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

Hide All
1. INAHTA. HTA Tools & Resources. Definitions [Internet]. The International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA). http://www.inahta.org/hta-tools-resources/ (accessed July 11, 2014).
2. Hofmann, B. Towards a procedure for inte¬grating moral issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:312318.
3. Burls, A, Caron, L, de Langavant, GC, et al. Tackling ethical issues in health technology assessment: A proposed framework. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:230237.
4. Saarni, SI, Braunack-Mayer, A, Hofmann, B, van der Wilt, GJ. Different methods for ethical analysis in health technology assessment: An empirical study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:305312.
5. Assasi, N, Schwartz, L, Tarride, J, Campbell, K, Goeree, R. Methodological guidance documents for evaluation of ethical considerations in health technology assessment: A systematic review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;14:203220.
6. Stoklosa, A, Bond, K. Workshop on methodology in ethics for health technology assessment: Assessing the need for and quality of ethics analyses in HTA. Cologne, Germany: Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, Canada and Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen; October 2013.
7. Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
8. Gillon, R. Principles of health care ethics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1994.
9. INAHTA. INAHTA's working group on handling ethical issues. Final report. June 2005. Alberta, Canada: The International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment. Ethics Working Group.
10. Saarni, S, Autti-Rämö, I, Lühman, D, et al. EUnetHTA WP4 - HTA Core Model for Medical and Surgical Interventions – Version 1.0r 31 Dec 2008. Copenhagen: EUnetHTA.
11. Hermerén, G. Hälsa och etiska analys i ett aktörsperspektiv. Begrepp om hälsa. Stockholm, Liber; 1995.
12. The Swedish Code of Statutes. [The Swedish Health and Medical Services Act (1982:763)]. [Internet] Stockholm. http://www.riksdagen.se/sv/Dokument-Lagar/Lagar/Svenskforfattningssamling/Halso-och-sjukvardslag-1982_sfs-1982-763/ (accessed July 11, 2014).
13. Socialutskottet. Etisk bedömning av nya metoder i vården - en uppföljning av landstingens och statens insatser (2013/14:RFR1). Stockholm: Sveriges Riksdag; 2013.
14. Göthberg, G, Bergh, C, Dahlgren, J, et al. Bariatric surgery in adolescents with severe obesity. [Bariatrisk kirurgi för ungdomar med svår fetma]. Göteborg: Västra Götalandsregionen, Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset, HTA-centrum; 2014. Regional activity-based HTA 2014:64.
15. Broqvist, M, Branting, Elgstrand M, Carlsson, P, et al. National model for transparent prioritisation in Swedish health care. [Revised Version]. Linköping University: National Center for Priority Setting in Healthcare, 2011.
16. Duthie, K, Bond, K. Improving ethics analysis in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:6470.
17. Droste, S, Dintsios, CM, Gerber, A. Information on ethical issues health technology assessment. How and where to find them. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26:441–9.
18. Hofmann, B. Etikk i vurdering av helsetiltak. Utvikling av en metode for å synliggjøre etiske utfordringer i vurdering av helsetiltak. Rapport nr 26−2008. Oslo: Nasjonalt kunnskapssenter for helsetjenesten, 2008.
19. Sandman, L, Heintz, E. Assessment vs. appraisal of ethical aspects of health technology assessment: Can the distinction be upheld? GMS Health Technol Assess. 2014;10: Doc05.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed