Banta, HD, Jonsson, E. History of HTA: An introduction. Int J Technol Assessment Health Care. 2009;25
Porter, ME. What is value in health care?
N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2477-2481.
Mauskopf, JA, Sullivan, SD, Annemans, L, et al.
Discourse and morality. Ethics. 2000;110:514-536.
Caro, JJ, Nord, E, Siebert, U, et al.
The efficiency Frontier approach to economic evaluation of health-care interventions. Health Econ. 2010;19:1117-1127.
Brock, D. Ethical issues in the use of cost effectiveness analysis for the prioritization of health care resources. In: Khusfh, G, Engelhardt, T, eds. Bioethics: A philosophical overview. Dordrecht: Kluwer Publishers; 2004:353-380.
Brock, D. Priority to the worst off in health care resource prioritization. In: Battin, M, Rhodes, R, Silvers, A, eds. Medicine and social justice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002:362-372.
Morality, mortality: Death and whom to save from it. (Vol. I). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993.
How to achieve fair distribution of ARTs in “3 by 5”: Fair process and legitimacy in patient selection. Geneva: World Health Organization/UNAIDS; 2004.
Dolan, P, Shaw, R, Tsuchiya, A, Williams, A. QALY maximization and people's preferences: A methodological review of the literature. Health Econ. 2005;14:197-208.
Menzel, P, Gold, M, Nord, E, Pinto-Prades, JL, Richardson, J, Ubel, P. Toward a broader view of values in cost-effectiveness analysis in health care. Hastings Cent Rep. 1999;29:7-15.
Cohen, J. Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In: Bohman, J, Rehg, W, eds. Deliberative democracy. Essays on reasons and politics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1997:407-437.
A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1971.
Daniels, N. Wide reflective equilibrium and theory choice in ethics. J Philos. 1979;76:256-282.
Justice and justification: Reflective equilibrium in theory and practice. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
van der Burg, W, van Willigenburg, Theo, (eds.). 1998. Reflective equilibrium: Essays in Honour of Robert Heeger (Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy). Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1998.
Reuzel, RPB, van der Wilt, GJ, ten Have, HAMJ, de Vries Robbé, PF. Interactive technology assessment and wide reflective equilibrium. J Med Philos. 2001;26:245-261.
Schön, D, Rein, M. Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1995.
Health technology assessment and interactive evaluation: Different perspectives. Thesis. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen; 2001.
Democracy and expertise. Reorienting policy inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
Daniels, N, Sabin, J. Setting limits fairly. 1st and 2nd eds. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002:2008.
Farrell, A, VanDeveer, SD, Jäger, J. Environmental assessments: Four under-appreciated elements of design. Glob Environ Change. 2001;11:311-333.
Moret, M, Reuzel, RPB, van der Wilt, GJ, Grin, J. Validity and reliability of qualitative data analysis: Inter-observer agreement in reconstructing interpretative frames. Field Methods. 2007;19:24-39.
Grin, J, van de Graaf, H. Technology assessment as learning. Sci Technol Hum Values. 1996;20:72-99.
Daniels, N, Sabin, J. Limits to health care: Fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philos Public Aff. 1997;26:303-350.
Daniels, N, Sabin, J. Setting limits fairly: Learning to share resources for health. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.