2.Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and for the council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending directive 2001/83/EC, regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing council directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC [Internet]. Council of the European Union; 2017 May 5. 175 p. [cited September 18, 2017]. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ENG/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017R0745&from=EN (accessed May 9, 2018).
3.Maisel, WH. Medical device regulation: An introduction for the practicing physician. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:296–302.
4.Pecchia, L, Craven, MP. Early stage health technology assessment (HTA) of biomedical devices: The MATCH experience [Internet]. In: Long, M, editor. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, May 26–31, 2012, Beijing, China. Berlin: Springer; 2012 [cited December 12, 2016]. (IFMBE proceedings). http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/1643/1/Pecchia_L._Early_Stage_HTA_of_Biomedical_Devices_with_ref_added.pdf (accessed May 9, 2018)
5.Ciani, O, Wilcher, B, Blankart, CR, et al. Health technology assessment of medical devices: A survey of non-European union agencies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31:154–165.
11.Tarricone, R, Torbica, A, Drummond, M, MedtecHTA Project Group. Key Recommendations from the MedtecHTA Project. Health Econ. 2017;26(Suppl 1):145–152.
12.Schnell-Inderst, P, Hunger, T, Conrads-Frank, A, Arvandi, M, Siebert, U. Ten recommendations for assessing the comparative effectiveness of therapeutic medical devices: A targeted review and adaptation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;94:97–113.
16.Margotti, AE, Santos, F, Garcia, R. Decision making process to incorporate medical equipment in hospital: Clinical engineering perception [Internet]. In: Long M, editor. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, May 26–31, Beijing, China. Berlin: Springer; 2013 [cited December 12, 2016]. (IFMBE proceedings).
17.Pecchia, L. Health technology assessment in medical devices in low and middle income countries: Study design and preliminary results. In: EMBEC & NBC, June 11–15, Tampere, Finland: Springer; 2017;65:225-8. (IFMBE Proceedings)
19.IFMBE [Internet]. Taiwan: IFMBE Health Technology Assessment Division. 2017 [cited July 6, 2017]. http://htad.ifmbe.org/ (accessed May 9, 2018). 20.Hsu, C, Sandford, BA. The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation [Internet]. 2007 Aug [cited 2016 November 30, 2016];12(10). http://pareonline.net/pdf/v12n10.pdf
21.Okoli, C, Pawlowski, SD. The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Inf Manage. 2004;42:15–29.
22.Thangaratinam, S, Redman, C. The Delphi technique. Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;7:120–125.
23.Kelly, SE, Moher, D, Clifford, TJ. Defining rapid reviews: A modified Delphi consensus approach. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016;32:265–275.
24.Lingg, M, Wyss, K, Duran-Arenas, L. Effects of procurement practices on quality of medical device or service received: A qualitative study comparing countries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:362.
25.Callea, G, Armeni, P, Marsilio, M, Jommi, C, Tarricone, R. The impact of HTA and procurement practices on the selection and prices of medical devices. Soc Sci Med. 2017;174:89–95.
26.Akpinar, I, Jacobs, P, Husereau, D. Medical device prices in economic evaluations. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;20:1–4.
27.Drummond, M, Griffin, A, Tarricone, R. Economic evaluation for devices and drugs--same or different? Value Health. 2009;12:402–404.
28.Taylor, RS, Iglesias, CP. Assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of medical devices and drugs: Are they that different? Value Health. 2009;12:404–406.
29.Sorenson, C, Tarricone, R, Siebert, M, Drummond, M. Applying health economics for policy decision making: Do devices differ from drugs? Europace. 2011;13(Suppl 2):ii54–ii58.
30.Sherman, RE, Anderson, SA, Dal Pan, GJ, et al. Real-world evidence - What is it and what can it tell us? N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2293–2297.
33.Sedrakyan, A, Campbell, B, Merino, JG, et al. IDEAL-D: A rational framework for evaluating and regulating the use of medical devices. BMJ. 2016;353:i2372.
34.Ramsay, CR, Grant, AM, Wallace, SA, et al. Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:1–79.
35.Borsci, S, Uchegbu, I, Buckle, P, et al. Designing medical technology for resilience: Integrating health economics and human factors approaches. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 Jan 15:15–26.
36.Prada, G. Value-based procurement: Canada's healthcare imperative. Healthc Manage Forum. 2016;29:162–164.
37.ISO 9241-11:1998. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) -- part 11: Guidance on usability. Geneva: International Standards Organization; 1998 March.
38.ISO 9241-210:2010. Ergonomics of human-system interaction -- part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Geneva: International Standards Organization; 2010 March.
39.IEC/TR 80002-1:2009. Medical device software -- part 1: Guidance on the application of ISO 14971 to medical device software. Geneva: International Standards Organization; 2009.
40.IEC 60601-1-2,2001: New EMC requirements for medical equipment. IEEE Xplore®; 2011.
41.International Electrotechnical Commission [Internet]. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission. 2017 [cited June 20, 2017]. http://www.iec.ch/ (accessed May 10, 2018). 42.International Standards Organization [Internet]. Geneva: International Standards Organization. 2017 [cited June 20, 2017]. https://www.iso.org/home.html (accessed May 10, 2018).