Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

HOSPITAL MANAGERS’ NEED FOR INFORMATION ON HEALTH TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS

  • Anne Mette Ølholm (a1), Kristian Kidholm (a2), Mette Birk-Olsen (a2) and Janne Buck Christensen (a2)
Abstract

Objectives: There is growing interest in implementing hospital-based health technology assessment (HB-HTA) as a tool to facilitate decision making based on a systematic and multidisciplinary assessment of evidence. However, the decision-making process, including the informational needs of hospital decision makers, is not well described. The objective was to review empirical studies analysing the information that hospital decision makers need when deciding about health technology (HT) investments.

Methods: A systematic review of empirical studies published in English or Danish from 2000 to 2012 was carried out. The literature was assessed by two reviewers working independently. The identified informational needs were assessed with regard to their agreement with the nine domains of EUnetHTA's Core Model.

Results: A total of 2,689 articles were identified and assessed. The review process resulted in 14 relevant studies containing 74 types of information that hospital decision makers found relevant. In addition to information covered by the Core Model, other types of information dealing with political and strategic aspects were identified. The most frequently mentioned types of information in the literature related to clinical, economic and political/strategic aspects. Legal, social, and ethical aspects were seldom considered most important.

Conclusions: Hospital decision makers are able to describe their information needs when deciding on HT investments. The different types of information were not of equal importance to hospital decision makers, however, and full agreement between EUnetHTA's Core Model and the hospital decision-makers’ informational needs was not observed. They also need information on political and strategic aspects not covered by the Core Model.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      HOSPITAL MANAGERS’ NEED FOR INFORMATION ON HEALTH TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      HOSPITAL MANAGERS’ NEED FOR INFORMATION ON HEALTH TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      HOSPITAL MANAGERS’ NEED FOR INFORMATION ON HEALTH TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1. MP Gagnon . Hospital-based health technology assessment: Developments to date. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32:819824.

5. JR Landis , GG Koch . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159174.

6. C Galani , FFH Rutten . Self-reported healthcare decision-makers’ attitudes towards economic evaluations of medical technologies. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008;24:30493058.

7. LA Guindo , M Wagner , R Baltussen , et al.From efficacy to equity: Literature review of decision criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decision making. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2012;10:9.

8. MP Gagnon , M Desmartis , J Gagnon , et al.Introducing the patient's perspective in hospital health technology assessment (HTA): The views of HTA producers, hospital managers and patients. Health Expect. 2014;17:888900.

9. LE Parker , MJ Ritchie , JE Kirchner , RR Owen . Balancing health care evidence and art to meet clinical needs: Policymakers’ perspectives. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15:970975.

10. J Ratcliffe , HL Bekker , P Dolan , R Edlin . Examining the attitudes and preferences of health care decision-makers in relation to access, equity and cost-effectiveness: A discrete choice experiment. Health Policy. 2009;90:4557.

12. JL Gibson , DK Martin , PA Singer . Setting priorities in health care organizations: Criteria, processes, and parameters of success. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4:25.

13. BM Niedzwiedzka . Barriers to evidence-based decision making among Polish healthcare managers. Health Serv Manage Res. 2003;16:106115.

15. G Gallego , SJ Taylor , JA Brien . Funding and access to high cost medicines in public hospitals in Australia: Decision-makers’ perspectives. Health Policy. 2009;92:2734.

17. L Vuorenkoski , H Toiviainen , E Hemminki . Decision-making in priority setting for medicines – A review of empirical studies. Health Policy. 2009;86:19.

19. M McGregor . What decision-makers want and what they have been getting. Value Health. 2006;9:181185.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Ølholm supplementary material
Table S1

 Word (52 KB)
52 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 211 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 329 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.