Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Information on ethical issues in health technology assessment: How and where to find them

  • Sigrid Droste (a1), Charalabos-Markos Dintsios (a1) and Andreas Gerber (a1)
Abstract

Background: Comprehensive health technology assessments (HTAs) include thorough reflections on ethical issues associated with health technologies, their use, and value-based decisions in the assessment process. As methods of information retrieval for effectiveness assessments are not applicable to information retrieval on ethical issues, a specific methodological approach is necessary.

Objectives: In the absence of existing adapted methods, our objective was to develop a methodological approach for the systematic retrieval of information on ethical issues related to health technologies.

Method and Results: A literature search was conducted to verify the non-existence of published comprehensive methodological approaches for the information retrieval on ethical issues for HTAs, and resulted in no hits. We, therefore, developed a step-by-step workflow following the workflow of information retrieval for effectiveness assessments: Step 1: Translation of the search question using the PICO scheme and additional components. Step 2: Concept building by modeling and linking search components. Step 3: Identification of synonyms in all relevant languages. Step 4: Selection of relevant information sources. Step 5: Design of search strategies for bibliographic databases. Step 6: Execution of search strategies and information seeking, including hand-searching. Step 7: Saving of retrieval results and standardized reporting of the process and results. Step 8: Final quality check and calculation of precision and recall.

Conclusions: Systematic searching for information on ethical issues related to health technologies can be performed following the common retrieval workflow for effectiveness assessments, but should be performed separately applying adapted procedures and search terms on ethical issues relevant to the research question.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Information on ethical issues in health technology assessment: How and where to find them
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Information on ethical issues in health technology assessment: How and where to find them
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Information on ethical issues in health technology assessment: How and where to find them
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
1. Baeza-Yates, R, Ribeiro-Neto, B. Modern information retrieval. New York: ACM Press; 2005.
2. Beauchamp, TL. Philosophical ethics: An introduction to moral philosophy. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill; 2002.
3. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Grey matters: A practical search tool for evidence-based medicine. Ottawa: CADTH; 2009.
4. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. PRESS: Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies. Ottawa: CADTH; 2008.
5. Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM), University of Oxford. Asking focused questions. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1036.
6. DeJean, D, Giacomini, M, Schwartz, L, Miller, FA. Ethics in Canadian health technology assessment: A descriptive review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25:463469.
7. Dracos, A. [SIBIL: An information tool for the information retrieval on bioethics]. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2004;40:283286.
8. Droste, S, Gerhardus, A, Kollek, R. [Methods for the assessment of ethical aspects and moral concepts in society in short HTA reports an international survey]. Niebüll: Medicombooks.de; 2003.
9. Droste, S. [Systematic search for information on ethical issues in HTA reports on medical technologies or interventions]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2008;102:329341.
10. European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA). HTA definition. http://www.eunethta.net/Public/HTA.
11. European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA). HTA core model for medical and surgical interventions 1.0R. Helsinki: FINOHTA; 2008.
12. Fangerau, H. Finding European bioethical literature: An evaluation of the leading abstracting and indexing services. J Med Ethics. 2004;30:299303.
13. Gavel, Y, Andersson, PO, Knutssøn, GB. Euroethics: A database network on biomedical ethics. Health Info Libr J. 2006;23:169178.
14. Hofmann, B. Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:312318.
15. Hofmann, BM. Why ethics should be part of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:423429.
16. International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA). HTA resources: Definitions. http://www.inahta.org/HTA.
17. International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA), Ethics Working Group. INAHTA's Working Group on handling ethical issues: Final report. Stockholm: SBU; 2005.
18. Kahn, TJ, Ninomiya, H. Changing vocabularies: A guide to help bioethics searchers find relevant literature in National Library of Medicine databases using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) indexing vocabulary. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2003;13:275311.
19. Lampe, K, Mäkelä, M, Garrido, MV, et al. The HTA core model: A novel method for producing and reporting health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 (Suppl 2):920.
20. Lehoux, P, Williams-Jones, B. Mapping the integration of social and ethical issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23:916.
21. National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature, National Information Resource on Ethics and Human Genetics. Bioethics searcher's guide to online information resources. Washington DC: The Joseph and Rose Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University; 2009.
22. Niederstadt, C, Droste, S. Reporting and presenting information retrieval processes: The need for optimizing common practice in Health Technology Assessment HTA. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 26 (4).
23. Vaughn, L. Bioethics: Principles, issues, and cases. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Droste et al. supplementary material
Supplementary figures and tables

 Word (600 KB)
600 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed