LyratzopoulosG, PatrickH, CampbellB. Registers needed for new interventional procedures. Lancet. 2008;371:1734–1736.
WilmshurstP. The regulation of medical devices: Unsatisfactory, unscientific and in need of a major overhaul. BMJ. 2010;342:d2822
DentT, WortleyS, CampbellB. New interventional procedures. BMJ. 2004;329:3–4
WennbergD, LucasFL, BirkmeyerJD, BredenbergCE, FisherES. Variation in carotid endarterectomy mortality in the Medicare population: Trial hospitals, volume, and patient characteristics. JAMA. 1998;279:1278–1281.
BarkunJS, AronsonJK, FeldmanLS, et al.
Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. Lancet. 2009;374:1089–1096.
GravesSE. The value of arthroplasty registry data. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:8–9.
PatrickH, GallaugherS, Czoski-MurrayC, et al.
Usefulness of a short-term register for health technology assessment where the evidence base is poor. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26:95–101.
SmithCR, LeonMB, MackMJ, et al.
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2187–2198.
University College London. MINAP ninth public report: How the NHS cares for patients with heart attack. London: University College; 2010.
HillmanK, ChenJ, CretikosM, et al.
Introduction of the medical emergency team (MET) system: A cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365:2091–2097
GliklichR, DreyerN. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes, in Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, A.f.H.R.a. Quality, Editor 2010.
DavenportK, TimoneyAG, KeeleyFX, et al.
A 3-year review of The British Association of Urological Surgeons Section of Endourology Laparoscopic Nephrectomy Audit. BJU Int. 2005;97:333–337.
DreyerNA, GarnerS. Registries for robust evidence. JAMA. 2009;302:790–791.
HQIP. Challenges in evaluation of quality improvement methodologies: The example of clinical audit, H.Q.I. Partnership, Editor 2011, Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership.
ReesG, WithersK. Literature search - use of registers, 2010 (unpublished). London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
SibandaN, CopleyLP, LewseyJD, et al.
Revision rates after primary hip and knee replacement in England between 2003 and 2006. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e179.
PaxtonEW, NambaRS, MaletisGB, et al.
A prospective study of 80,000 total joint and 5000 anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in a community-based registry in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92
NHS South Central. Review of paediatric cardiac surgery services at Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust. Coventry: NHS South Central; 2010.
HallBL, HamiltonBH, RichardsK, et al.
Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: An evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg. 2009;250:363–376.
GrilliR, TaroniF. Managing the introduction of expensive medical procedures: Use of a registry. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006;11:89–93.
ThomasSM, BeardJD, IrelandM, AyersS. Results from the prospective registry of endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (RETA): Mid term results to five years. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29:563–570.
Academy Health. A first look at the volume and cost of comparative effectiveness research in the United States. Washington, DC: Academy Health; 2009.
National Joint Registry for England and Wales 8th Annual Report, 2011.
LarssonS, LawyerP, GarellickG, LindahlB, LundstromM. Use of 13 disease registries in 5 countries demonstrates the potential to use outcome data to improve health care's value. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31:220–227.
CohenD. Out of joint: The story of the ASR. BMJ. 2011;342:1116–1122.