Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Methodology of constructive technology assessment in health care

  • Kirsten F. L. Douma (a1), Kim Karsenberg (a1), Marjan J. M. Hummel (a2), Jolien M. Bueno-de-Mesquita (a1) and Wim H. van Harten (a3)...

Objectives: Technologies in health care are evolving quickly, with new findings in the area of biotechnological and genetic research being published regularly. A health technology assessment (HTA) is often used to answer the question of whether the new technology should be implemented into clinical practice. International evidence confirms that the results of HTA research sometimes have limited impact on practical implementation and on coverage decisions; the study design is commonly based on the paradigm of stability of both the technology and the environment, which is often not the case. Constructive technology assessment (CTA) was first described in the 1980s. In addition to the traditional HTA elements, this approach also takes into account the technology dynamics by emphasizing sociodynamic processes. With a CTA approach, comprehensive assessment can be combined with an intentional influence in a favorable direction to improve quality.

Methods: In this study, the methodological aspects mainly concerning the diagnostic use of CTA are explained. The methodology will be illustrated using the controlled introduction of a new technology, called microarray analysis, into the clinical practice of breast cancer treatment as a case study. Attention is paid to the operationalization of the phases of development and implementation and the research methods most appropriate for CTA.

Conclusions: In addition to HTA, CTA can be used as a complementary approach, especially in technologies that are introduced in an early stage of development in a controlled way.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

2. M Berg , der Grinten T van , N Klazinga . Technology assessment, priority setting, and appropriate care in Dutch health care. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004; 20: 3543.

3. E Draborg , D Gyrd-Hansen , PB Poulsen , M. Horder International comparison of the definition and the practical application of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005; 21: 8995.

6. M Johri , P Lehoux . The great escape? Prospects for regulating access to technology through health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003; 19: 179193.

9. M Leys . Health technology assessment: The contribution of qualitative research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003; 19: 317329.

10. T Molfenter , D Gustafson , C Kilo , A Bhattacharya , J Olsson . Prospective evaluation of a Bayesian Model to predict organisational change. Health Care Manage Rev. 2005; 30: 270279.

14. JW Schot . Constructive technology assessment and technology dynamics: The case of clean technologies. Sci Technol Human Values. 1992; 17: 3656.

15. JW Schot , A Rip . The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 1996; 54: 251268.

21. Veer LJ van't , H Dai , de Vijver MJ van , Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002; 415: 530536.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 40 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 125 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.