Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 10
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Ahmad, N. Peterson, N. and Torella, F. 2015. The Micromort: a unit for comparing and communicating risk to patients. International Journal of Clinical Practice, Vol. 69, Issue. 5, p. 515.

    Irwin, M. G. and Kong, V. K. F. 2014. Quantifying and communicating peri-operative risk. Anaesthesia, Vol. 69, Issue. 12, p. 1299.

    Sun, Clement S. Cantor, Scott B. Reece, Gregory P. Fingeret, Michelle C. Crosby, Melissa A. and Markey, Mia K. 2014. Helping Patients Make Choices about Breast Reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 134, Issue. 4, p. 597.

    Walker, KF Cohen, AL Walker, SH Allen, KM Baines, DL and Thornton, JG 2014. The dangers of the day of birth. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Vol. 121, Issue. 6, p. 714.

    Sun, Clement S. Reece, Gregory P. Crosby, Melissa A. Fingeret, Michelle C. Skoracki, Roman J. Villa, Mark T. Hanasono, Matthew M. Baumann, Donald P. Chang, David W. Cantor, Scott B. and Markey, Mia K. 2013. Plastic Surgeon Expertise in Predicting Breast Reconstruction Outcomes for Patient Decision Analysis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, Vol. 1, Issue. 8, p. e78.

    2011. Design Decisions under Uncertainty with Limited Information.

    Cameron, T. A. 2010. Euthanizing the Value of a Statistical Life. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Vol. 4, Issue. 2, p. 161.

    Guikema, Seth D. 2005. An estimation of the social costs of landfill siting using a choice experiment. Waste Management, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 331.

    Heckerman, David and Shwe, Michael 1993. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence.

    Heckerman, David E. and Nathwani, Bharat N. 1992. An evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of Pathfinder. Computers and Biomedical Research, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 56.

  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Volume 5, Issue 3
  • July 1989, pp. 357-370

Microrisks for Medical Decision Analysis

  • Ronald A. Howard (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 March 2009

Many would agree on the need to inform patients about the risks of medical conditions or treatments and to consider those risks in making medical decisions. The question is how to describe the risks and how to balance them with other factors in arriving at a decision. In this article, we present the thesis that part of the answer lies in defining an appropriate scale for risks that are often quite small. We propose that a convenient unit in which to measure most medical risks is the microprobability, a probability of 1 in 1 million. When the risk consequence is death, we can define a micromort as one microprobability of death. Medical risks can be placed in perspective by noting that we live in a society where people face about 270 micromorts per year from interactions with motor vehicles.

Continuing risks or hazards, such as are posed by following unhealthful practices or by the side-effects of drugs, can be described in the same micromort framework. If the consequence is not death, but some other serious consequence like blindness or amputation, the microrisk structure can be used to characterize the probability of disability.

Once the risks are described in the microrisk form, they can be evaluated in terms of the patient's willingness-to-pay to avoid them. The suggested procedure is illustrated in the case of a woman facing a cranial arteriogram of a suspected arterio-venous malformation. Generic curves allow such analyses to be performed approximately in terms of the patient's sex, age, and economic situation. More detailed analyses can be performed if desired.

Microrisk analysis is based on the proposition that precision in language permits the soundness of thought that produces clarity of action and peace of mind.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *