1.Allen, C, Clarke, M. International activity in Cochrane Review Groups with particular reference to China. Chin J Evid Based Med. 2006;6:541–545.
2.Allen, C, Clarke, M, Tharyan, P. International activity in The Cochrane Collaboration with particular reference to India. Natl Med J India. 2007;20:250–255.
3.Altman, D, Antes, G, Gøtzsche, P, et al. Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008). Chapter 8. In: Higgins, JPT, Green, S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008.
4.Beane, B, Gingrich, N, Kerry, J. How to take American health care from worst to first. New York Times, 24 October, 2008, p A31.
5.Becker, L, Oxman, AD. Overviews of reviews. Chapter 22. In: Higgins, JPT, Green, S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.
6.Bero, L, Rennie, L. The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, maintaining and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. JAMA. 1995;274:1935–1938.
7.Chalmers, I. Randomised controlled trials of fetal monitoring 1973–1977. In: Thalhammer, O, Baumgarten, K, Pollak, A, eds. Perinatal medicine. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme; 1979:260–265.
8.Chalmers, I. Electronic publications for updating controlled trial reviews. Lancet. 1986;2:287.
9.Chalmers, I, ed. Oxford database of perinatal trials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1988–1992.
10.Chalmers, I. The work of the National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit: One example of technology assessment in perinatal care. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1991;7:430–459.
11.Chalmers, I. The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;703:156–165.
12.Chalmers, I. The prehistory of the UK Cochrane Centre. In: Bosch, X, ed. Back to the front. Barcelona: Published Privately; 2003:242–253.
13.Chalmers, I, Haynes, RB. Reporting, updating, and correcting systematic reviews of the effects of health care. BMJ. 1994;309:862–865.
14.Chalmers, I, Hetherington, J, Newdick, M, et al. The Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials: Developing a register of published reports of controlled trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:306–324.
15.Chalmers, I, Enkin, M, Keirse, MJNC. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.
16.Chalmers, I, Enkin, M, Keirse, MJ. Preparing and updating systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health care. Milbank Q. 1993;71:411–437.
17.Chalmers, I, Sackett, DL, Silagy, C. The Cochrane Collaboration. In: Maynard, A, Chalmers, I, eds. Non-random reflections on health services research. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 1997:231–239.
18.Clarke, M, Chalmers, I. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals: Islands in search of continents? JAMA. 1998;280:280–282.
19.Clarke, M, Alderson, P, Chalmers, I. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals. JAMA. 2002;287:2799–2801.
20.Clarke, L, Clarke, M, Clarke, T. How useful are Cochrane reviews in identifying research needs? J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007;12:101–103.
21.Clarke, M, Hopewell, S, Chalmers, I. Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: A status report. J R Soc Med. 2007;100:187–190.
22.Clarke, M, Langhorne, P. Revisiting the Cochrane Collaboration. Meeting the challenge of Archie Cochrane–and facing up to some new ones. BMJ. 2001;323:821.
23.Cochrane, AL. Effectiveness and efficiency: Random reflections on health services. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust; 1972.
24.Cochrane, AL. 1931–1971: A critical review, with particular reference to the medical profession. In: Medicines for the year 2000. London: Office of Health Economics; 1979:1–11.
25.Cumpston, M, Clark, K, Spithoff, D, Ohlsson, A. The good news: Evidence of the dissemination and influence of Cochrane systematic reviews [abstract]. 12th Cochrane Colloquium: Bridging the Gaps; 2004 Oct 2–6; Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
26.Delamothe, T. Is that it? How online articles have changed over the past five years. BMJ. 2002;325:1475–1478.
27.Dickersin, K, Manheimer, E. The Cochrane Collaboration: Evaluation of health care and services using systematic reviews of the results of randomized clinical trials. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1998;41:315–331.
28.Dickersin, K, Manheimer, E, Wieland, S, et al. Development of the Cochrane Collaboration's CENTRAL Register of controlled clinical trials. Eval Health Prof. 2002;25:38–64.
29.Enkin, M, Chalmers, I, eds. Effectiveness and satisfaction in antenatal care. Clinics in development medicine nos. 81/82. London: Spastics International Medical Publications/William Heinemann Medical Books; 1982.
30.Enkin, M, Keirse, MJ, Chalmers, I. A guide to effective care during pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.
31.Enkin, M, Keirse, MJ, Renfrew, MJ, Neilson, JP. A guide to effective care during pregnancy and childbirth. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993.
32.Enkin, M, Keirse, MJ, Renfrew, MJ, Neilson, JP. The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Database. Disk Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software Ltd; 1994.
33.Glenton, C, Underland, V, Kho, M, Oxman, AD. Summaries of findings, descriptions of interventions, and information about adverse effects would make reviews more informative. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:770–778.
34.Grant, A, Chalmers, I. Register of controlled trials in perinatal medicine. Lancet. 1981;1:100.
35.Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Kunz, R, et al. What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ. 2008;336:995–998.
36.Higgins, JPT, Green, S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008.
37.Holmes, L, Lusher, A, Chalmers, I. Citation of Cochrane Reviews in national and international guidelines and policies. Reports of the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme, Effective Health Care, Finnish Evidence-Based Medicine Guidelines, and Clinical Evidence. UK: Cochrane Centre; 2001.
38.Jadad, AR, Cook, DJ, Jones, A, et al. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals. JAMA. 1998;280:278–280.
39.Lewis, S, Clarke, M. Forest plots: Trying to see the wood and the trees. BMJ. 2001;322:1479–1480.
40.Mallett, S, Clarke, M. How many Cochrane reviews are needed to cover existing evidence on the effects of health care interventions? ACP J Club. 2003;139:A11.
41.Milbank Quarterly. Special Issue on Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Milbank Q. 1993;71:401–533.
42.Moher, D, Tetzlaff, J, Tricco, AC, Sampson, M, Altman, DG. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e78.
43.Mugford, M, Grant, A, Chalmers, I. Developing a register of randomized controlled trials in perinatal medicine. In: Lindberg, DAB, Reichertz, PL, eds. Lecture notes in medical informatics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1982:162–167.
44.National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit. A classified bibliography of controlled trials in perinatal medicine 1940–1984. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1985.
45.Office of Technology Assessment. The impact of randomized clinical trials on health policy and medical practice. PB84–114560. Washington DC: Office of Technology Assessment; 1983. http://www.princeton.edu/~ota/ns20/year_f.html.
46.Oxman, A. The Cochrane Collaboration in the 21st century: Ten challenges and one reason why they must be met. In: Egger, M, Davey, Smith G, Altman, D, eds. Systematic reviews in health care: Meta-analysis in context. 2nd ed. London: BMJ Books; 2001:459–473.
47.Oxman, A. Summaries of findings in Cochrane reviews. The Cochrane Collaboration Methods Groups Newsletter. 2004;8:8–9.
48.Peckham, M. Research and development for the National Health Service. Lancet. 1991;338:367–371.
49.Rosenbaum, S, Glenton, C, Nylund, H, Oxman, A. Development and evaluation of summary of findings tables for Cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol., in press.
50.Saunders, MC, Dick, JS, Brown, I, McPherson, K, Chalmers, I. The effects of hospital admission for bed rest on the duration of twin pregnancy: A randomised trial. Lancet. 1985;2:793–795.
51.Senn, S. The quality of systematic reviews. Review is biased. BMJ. 2000;321:297.
52.Shea, B, Boers, M, Grimshaw, J, Hamel, CD, Bouter, LM. Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:27.
53.Sheldon, T, Chalmers, I. The UK Cochrane Centre and the NHS Centre for reviews and dissemination: Respective roles within the Information Systems Strategy of the NHS R&D programme, coordination and principles underlying collaboration. Health Econ. 1994;3:201–203.
54.Sinclair, JC, Bracken, M. Effective care of the newborn infant. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992.