Skip to main content

Policies of screening for colorectal cancer in European countries

  • Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea (a1), José Asua (a2) and Kepa Latorre (a3)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the current status of population screening for colon/rectum cancer in Europe to compare the different strategies, the coverage, the existence of pilot experiences, regional coverages, and the risk factors considered in each strategy.

Methods: A comprehensive, systematic search was performed in the literature for documents addressing population screening for colon/rectum cancer in Europe. An ad hoc questionnaire was prepared including questions considered relevant. The questionnaire was reviewed by experts in the area. To identify key informants, colleague members of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA), participants in the EUnetHTA project, or representatives of the ministries of health of the different European countries were contacted. The information provided by key informants was checked with information directly obtained from the ministries of health, gray literature, and research documents.

Results: An 88 percent response rate was obtained. In countries for which no questionnaire data were collected, information was directly retrieved from the Web sites of the corresponding ministries. Four countries were found to perform population screenings: Austria, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. However, they used different strategies. Five countries had begun regional or local strategies: Denmark, Finland, Italy, Spain, and Switzerland, and two additional countries (the Netherlands and Norway) reported ongoing research studies intended to determine the best strategy to implement a population-based screening program. Differences were found in age range, procedure chosen, and follow-up period.

Conclusions: Even though the European Council recommended a wider implementation of population screening for colon/rectum cancer, our results suggest that this recommendation continues to be valid. The differences found in screening strategies (in terms of age range, procedures, risk factors considered, and follow-up periods) are not warranted by the results obtained in research studies or regional-national cancer registries.

Hide All
1. Berrino F, De Angelis R, Sant M et al. ; EUROCARE Working group. Survival for eight major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995-99: Results of the EUROCARE-4 study. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:773783.
2. Bouvier AM, Dancourt V, Faivre J. The role of cancer registries in the surveillance, epidemiologic research and disease prevention. Bull Cancer. 2003;90:865871.
3. Castells A, Marzo M, Bellas B et al. Guia clinica de prevencion del cancer colorrectal. Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;27:573634.
4. Castiglione G, Zappa M, Ciatto S. Comments on: Recomendations on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the European Union. Advisory Comittee on Cancer Prevention. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:14731478.
5. Consejo de la Unión Europea. Recomendaciones sobre el cribado del cáncer en la Unión Europea. Preparado por el Comité Consultivo para la prevención del cáncer tras la conferencia sobre el cribado y detección precoz del cáncer. 1999.
6. Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M et al. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:581–92.
7. Ferrandez A, Sainz S. Detección precoz del cáncer de colon. Estrategias individuales y colectivas. Huntsman Cancer Institute. Salt Lake City. Utah. Rev Clin Esp. 2003;203:542544.
8. Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Irwig L, Towler B, Watson E. Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;1:CD001216. Review.
9. Jensen OM, Storm HH. Objetivos y usos de los registros de cáncer. In: Jensen OM, Parkin DM, MacLennan R, Muir CS, Skeet RG, eds. Registros de Cáncer: Principios y Métodos. Lyon, Francia: IARC; 1995:723.
10. Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Salud. Plan Integral de Oncología de Andalucía 2002–2006.
11. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. La situación del cáncer en España.
12. National Cancer Institute. Cáncer de colon. Versión profesional de la Salud. Mayo 2007.
13. Paz Valiñas l, Atienza Merino G. Evaluación de la eficacia y efectividad del cribado población al del cáncer colorrectal. Aplicabilidad en el sistema Nacional de Salud. Santiago de Compostela: servicio Galego de Saúde. Axencia de avaliación de tecnologías Sanitarias de Galicia, Avalia-t; 2002. Informe de Evaluación. INF 2003/02.
14. Rex DK. American College of Gastroenterology action plan for colorectal cancer prevention. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:574577.
15. Ruiz-Ramos M, Escolar A, Hermosín T. Mortality from colorectal cancer in Andalucía: findings in favor of mass screening. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2005;97:104114.
16. Sancho-Garnier H, Signan N, Ruiz de Campos L. Detección temprana. En: Prevención del cáncer: Estrategias basadas en la evidencia. Ginebra, Suiza: UICC; 2006:221239.
17. Screening for colorectal cancer: Recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:129131.
18. The National Centre for Screening Monitoring Fourth Report. Rivista dell'Associazione italiana di epidemiologia ANNO 30 (1) GENNAIO-FEBBRAIO 2006 SUPPLEMENTO 3.
19. Viñes JJ, Ardanaz E, Arrazola A, Gaminde I. Epidemiología poblacional del cáncer colorrectal: Revisión de la causalidad. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2003;26:7997.
20. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 1996: Fighting disease, fostering development. World Health Organization, Geneva; 1996.
21. WHO. Strategies to improve and strengthen cancer control programmes in Europe. Report of a EHO consultation. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Gutierrez supplementary material
Gutierrez supplementary material

 Word (66 KB)
66 KB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 14 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 135 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.