Consumer involvement in health technology assessment. Edmonton, Canada: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research; 2005.
Hailey, D, Werko, S, Bakri, R, et al.
Involvement of consumers in health technology assessment activities by Inahta agencies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29:79–83.
Abelson, J, Giacomini, M, Lehoux, P, Gauvin, FP. Bringing ‘the public’ into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: From principles to practice. Health Policy. 2007;82:37–50.
Bridges, JF, Jones, C. Patient-based health technology assessment: A vision of the future. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23:30–35.
Gagnon, MP, Desmartis, M, Lepage-Savary, D, et al.
Introducing patients' and the public's perspectives to health technology assessment: A systematic review of international experiences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:31–42.
Menon, D, Stafinski, T. Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011;11:75–89.
Whitty, JA. An international survey of the public engagement practices of health technology assessment organizations. Value Health. 2013;16:155–163.
Levin, L, Goeree, R, Sikich, N, et al.
Establishing a comprehensive continuum from an evidentiary base to policy development for health technologies: The Ontario experience. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23:299–309.
Public Engagement Subcommittee of the Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee. Final Report. Toronto, ON: Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee; 2007.
Public engagement pilot study on point-of-care International Normalized Ratio (INR) monitoring devices. Toronto, Canada: Medical Advisory Secretariat, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care; 2009.
Bombard, Y, Abelson, J, Simeonov, D, Gauvin, FP. Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approach. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:135–144.
Abelson, J, Bombard, Y, Gauvin, FP, Simeonov, D, Boesveld, S. Assessing the impacts of citizen deliberations on the health technology process. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013;29:282–289.
Gauvin, FP, Abelson, J, Lavis, J. Evidence brief: Strengthening public and patient engagement in health technology assessment in Ontario. Hamilton, Canada: McMaster Health Forum; May 8, 2014.
Gauvin, FP, Lavis, J. Dialogue summary: Strengthening public and patient engagement in health technology assessment in Ontario. Hamilton, Canada: McMaster Health Forum; May 8, 2014.
Hailey, D, Nordwall, M. Survey on the involvement of consumers in health technology assessment programs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22:497–499.
Gauvin, FP, Abelson, J, Giacomini, M, Eyles, J, Lavis, JN. “It all depends”: Conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:1518–1526.
National Institute for Health Research. NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre [cited June 23, 2014]. http://www.netscc.ac.uk.
Center for New Health Technology Assessment. Center for New Health Technology Assessment [cited June 23, 2014]. http://neca.re.kr/nHTA/eng/.
pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review. pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review [cited June 23, 2014]. http://www.pcodr.ca/.
Wynne, B. Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science - Hitting the notes, but missing the music?
Community Genet. 2006;9:211–220.
Abelson, J, Eyles, J. Public participation and citizen governance in the Canadian health system. In: Forest, PG, McIntosh, T, Marchildon, G, eds. Changing health care in Canada: The Romanow Papers, Volume 2. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press; 2004.
Bovens, M. Public Accountability. In: Ferlie, E, Lynn, LE, Pollitt, C, eds. Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2007.
Chinitz, D. Health technology assessment in four countries: Response from political science. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:55–60.
Coulter, A, Ellins, J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ. 2007;335:24–27.
Facey, K, Boivin, A, Gracia, J, et al.
Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: A route to robust evidence and fair deliberation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26:334–340.
DeJean, D, Giacomini, M, Schwartz, L, Miller, FA. Ethics in Canadian health technology assessment: A descriptive review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25:463–469.
The problem of health technology: Policy implications for modern health care systems. New York, NY: Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group; 2006.
Drummond, M, Tarricone, R, Torbica, A. Assessing the added value of health technologies: Reconciling different perspectives. Value Health. 2013;16
Gagnon, MP, Desmartis, M, Gagnon, J, et al.
Introducing the patient's perspective in hospital health technology assessment (HTA): The views of HTA producers, hospital managers and patients. Health Expect. 2014;17:888–900.
Adelaide Health Technology Assessment Centre. About Adelaide Health Technology Assessment (AHTA) 2014 [cited June 23, 2014]. http://www.adelaide.edu.au/ahta/.
Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. SBU – Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment [cited June 23, 2014]. http://www.sbu.se/en/.
KCE - Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre. KCE - Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, [cited June 23, 2014]. http://kce.fgov.be.
Medical Services Advisory Committee. Medical Services Advisory Committee [cited June 23, 2014]. http://www.msac.gov.au/.
Oliver, S, Armes, DG, Gyte, G. Public involvement in setting a national research agenda: A mixed methods evaluation. Patient. 2009;2:179–190.
Jones, M, Einsiedel, E. Institutional policy learning and public consultation: The Canadian xenotransplantation experience. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:655–662.
Chambers, D, Wilson, PM, Thompson, CA, et al.
Maximizing the impact of systematic reviews in health care decision making: A systematic scoping review of knowledge-translation resources. Milbank Q. 2011;89:131–156.
Moran, R, Davidson, P. An uneven spread: A review of public involvement in the National Institute of Health Research's Health Technology Assessment program. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:343–347.
Davies, C, Wetherell, M, Barnett, E. Citizens at the centre: Deliberative participation in health care decisions. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press; 2006.
Gauvin, FP, Abelson, J, Giacomini, M, Eyles, J, Lavis, JN. Moving cautiously: Public involvement and the health technology assessment community. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:43–49.
Rowe, G, Frewer, LJ. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci Technol Human Values. 2005;30:251–290.
Carman, KL, Heeringa, JW, Heil, SKR, et al. Public deliberation to elicit input on health topics: Findings from a literature review. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013.
Boivin, A, Lehoux, P, Lacombe, R, Burgers, J, Grol, R. Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: A cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2014;9:24.