Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 45
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Garritty, Chantelle M. Norris, Susan L. and Moher, David 2016. Developing WHO rapid advice guidelines in the setting of a public health emergency. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,

    Jayakumar, Kishore L. Lavenberg, Julia A. Mitchell, Matthew D. Doshi, Jalpa A. Leas, Brian Goldmann, David R. Williams, Kendal Brennan, Patrick J. and Umscheid, Craig A. 2016. Evidence synthesis activities of a hospital evidence-based practice center and impact on hospital decision making. Journal of Hospital Medicine, Vol. 11, Issue. 3, p. 185.

    Kaltenthaler, Eva Cooper, Katy Pandor, Abdullah Martyn-St. James, Marrissa Chatters, Robin and Wong, Ruth 2016. The use of rapid review methods in health technology assessments: 3 case studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 16, Issue. 1,

    Kelly, Shannon E Moher, David and Clifford, Tammy J 2016. Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines. Systematic Reviews, Vol. 5, Issue. 1,

    McIntosh, Heather M. Calvert, Julie Macpherson, Karen J. and Thompson, Lorna 2016. The Healthcare Improvement Scotland evidence note rapid review process. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, p. 95.

    Pham, Mai T. Waddell, Lisa Rajić, Andrijana Sargeant, Jan M. Papadopoulos, Andrew and McEwen, Scott A. 2016. Implications of applying methodological shortcuts to expedite systematic reviews: three case studies using systematic reviews from agri-food public health. Research Synthesis Methods,

    Tricco, Andrea C. Zarin, Wasifa Antony, Jesmin Hutton, Brian Moher, David Sherifali, Diana and Straus, Sharon E. 2016. An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 70, p. 61.

    Wickremasinghe, Deepthi Kuruvilla, Shyama Mays, Nicholas and Avan, Bilal Iqbal 2016. Taking knowledge users’ knowledge needs into account in health: an evidence synthesis framework. Health Policy and Planning, Vol. 31, Issue. 4, p. 527.

    Assasi, Nazila Schwartz, Lisa Tarride, Jean-Eric O’Reilly, Daria and Goeree, Ron 2015. BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS INFLUENCING ETHICAL EVALUATION IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Vol. 31, Issue. 03, p. 113.

    Haby, Michelle M. Chapman, Evelina Clark, Rachel Barreto, Jorge Reveiz, Ludovic and Lavis, John N. 2015. Designing a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision-making in the Americas region: using the best available evidence and case studies. Implementation Science, Vol. 11, Issue. 1,

    Polisena, Julie Garritty, Chantelle Kamel, Chris Stevens, Adrienne and Abou-Setta, Ahmed M 2015. Rapid review programs to support health care and policy decision making: a descriptive analysis of processes and methods. Systematic Reviews, Vol. 4, Issue. 1,

    Polisena, Julie Garritty, Chantelle Umscheid, Craig A. Kamel, Chris Samra, Kevin Smith, Jeannette and Vosilla, Ann 2015. Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda. Systematic Reviews, Vol. 4, Issue. 1,

    Toomey, Elaine Currie-Murphy, Laura Matthews, James and Hurley, Deirdre A. 2015. Implementation fidelity of physiotherapist-delivered group education and exercise interventions to promote self-management in people with osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain: A rapid review Part II. Manual Therapy, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 287.

    Toomey, Elaine Currie-Murphy, Laura Matthews, James and Hurley, Deirdre A. 2015. The effectiveness of physiotherapist-delivered group education and exercise interventions to promote self-management for people with osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain: A rapid review Part I. Manual Therapy, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 265.

    Tricco, Andrea C. Antony, Jesmin Zarin, Wasifa Strifler, Lisa Ghassemi, Marco Ivory, John Perrier, Laure Hutton, Brian Moher, David and Straus, Sharon E. 2015. A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Medicine, Vol. 13, Issue. 1,

    Tsertsvadze, Alexander Chen, Yen-Fu Moher, David Sutcliffe, Paul and McCarthy, Noel 2015. How to conduct systematic reviews more expeditiously?. Systematic Reviews, Vol. 4, Issue. 1,

    Varker, Tracey Forbes, David Dell, Lisa Weston, Adele Merlin, Tracy Hodson, Stephanie and O'Donnell, Meaghan 2015. Rapid evidence assessment: increasing the transparency of an emerging methodology. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 21, Issue. 6, p. 1199.

    Welch, Vivian A. Nickerson, Jason W. Shea, Beverley J. Ghogomu, Elizabeth and Walker, Peter 2015. Patient-centered rapid reviews will drive local decision making: commentary on Hartling et al.. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 68, Issue. 12, p. 1526.

    Hammond, Julia and Seekins, Tom 2014. Environmental Contexts and Disability.

    Lorenzetti, Diane L. Topfer, Leigh-Ann Dennett, Liz and Clement, Fiona 2014. VALUE OF DATABASES OTHER THAN MEDLINE FOR RAPID HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Vol. 30, Issue. 02, p. 173.

  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Volume 24, Issue 2
  • April 2008, pp. 133-139

Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment

  • Amber Watt (a1), Alun Cameron (a1), Lana Sturm (a1), Timothy Lathlean (a1), Wendy Babidge (a1), Stephen Blamey (a2), Karen Facey (a3), David Hailey (a4), Inger Norderhaug (a5) and Guy Maddern (a6)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2008

Objectives: This review assessed current practice in the preparation of rapid reviews by health technology assessment (HTA) organizations, both internationally and in the Australian context, and evaluated the available peer-reviewed literature pertaining to the methodology used in the preparation of these reviews.

Methods: A survey tool was developed and distributed to a total of fifty International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) members and other selected HTA organizations. Data on a broad range of themes related to the conduct of rapid reviews were collated, discussed narratively, and subjected to simple statistical analysis where appropriate. Systematic searches of the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Australian Medical Index were undertaken in March 2007 to identify literature pertaining to rapid review methodology. Comparative studies, guidelines, program evaluations, methods studies, commentaries, and surveys were considered for inclusion.

Results: Twenty-three surveys were returned (46 percent), with eighteen agencies reporting on thirty-six rapid review products. Axiomatic trends were identified, but there was little cohesion between organizations regarding the contents, methods, and definition of a rapid review. The twelve studies identified by the systematic literature search did not specifically address the methodology underpinning rapid review; rather, many highlighted the complexity of the area. Authors suggested restricted research questions and truncated search strategies as methods to limit the time taken to complete a review.

Conclusions: Rather than developing a formalized methodology by which to conduct rapid reviews, agencies should work toward increasing the transparency of the methods used for each review. It is perhaps the appropriate use, not the appropriate methodology, of a rapid review that requires future consideration.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

2.L Best , A Stevens , D Colin-Jones . Rapid and responsive health technology assessment: The development and evaluation process in the South and West region of England. J Clinic Effectiv. 1997;2:5156.

7.D Hailey , P Corabian , C Harstall , W Schneider . The use and impact of rapid health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:651656.

12.A Stevens , R Milne , A Burls . Health technology assessment: History and demand. J Public Health Med. 2003;25:98101.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *