Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Fournier, Monique F 2012. Knowledge mobilization in the context of health technology assessment: an exploratory case study. Health Research Policy and Systems, Vol. 10, Issue. 1,


    Wilson, Michael G Rourke, Sean B Lavis, John N Bacon, Jean and Travers, Robb 2011. Community capacity to acquire, assess, adapt, and apply research evidence: a survey of Ontario's HIV/AIDS sector. Implementation Science, Vol. 6, Issue. 1,


    Rosenbaum, Sarah E Glenton, Claire Wiysonge, Charles Shey Abalos, Edgardo Mignini, Luciano Young, Taryn Althabe, Fernando Ciapponi, Agustín Marti, Sebastian Garcia Meng, Qingyue Wang, Jian Bradford, Ana Maria De la Hoz Kiwanuka, Suzanne N Rutebemberwa, Elizeus Pariyo, George W Flottorp, Signe and Oxman, Andrew D 2011. Evidence summaries tailored to health policy-makers in low- and middle-income countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Vol. 89, Issue. 1, p. 54.


    Lavis, John N Wilson, Michael G Moat, Kaelan A Hammill, Amanda C Boyko, Jennifer A Grimshaw, Jeremy M and Flottorp, Signe 2015. Developing and refining the methods for a ‘one-stop shop’ for research evidence about health systems. Health Research Policy and Systems, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 10.


    Saulle, R. Di Thiene, D. Gualano, M. R. Ceruti, M. Firenze, A. Di Stanislao, F. Siliquini, R. Romano, N. Ricciardi, W. Boccia, A. and La Torre, G. 2010. Health Technology Assessment: bisogni formativi teorici e pratici nelle Scuole di Specializzazione in Igiene e Medicina Preventiva. Giornale Italiano di Health Technology Assessment, Vol. 3, Issue. 2, p. 65.


    ×
  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Volume 26, Issue 4
  • October 2010, pp. 405-414

Supporting the use of health technology assessments in policy making about health systems

  • John N. Lavis (a1), Michael G. Wilson (a1), Jeremy M. Grimshaw (a2), R. Brian Haynes (a3), Mathieu Ouimet (a4), Parminder Raina (a1), Russell L. Gruen (a5) and Ian D. Graham (a6)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S026646231000108X
  • Published online: 06 October 2010
Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study is to profile the health technology assessments (HTAs) produced in Canada and other selected countries and assess their potential to inform policy making about health systems in jurisdictions other than the ones for which they were produced, and to develop and pilot test prototypes for packaging and assessing the relevance of HTAs for health system managers and policy makers.

Methods: We compiled an inventory of all HTAs that were produced by nine HTA agencies between September 2003 and August 2006; coded the title and abstract of each HTA according to the technologies assessed, methods used, and whether or not context-specific actionable messages were provided; developed a prototype for a structured, decision-relevant HTA summary and for a relevance-assessment form; and pilot-tested the prototypes using semistructured telephone interviews with a purposive sample of Canadian healthcare managers and policy makers.

Results: Our review of the 223 HTAs identified that: (i) 44 HTAs addressed health system arrangements (20 percent); (ii) 205 incorporated a systematic review (92 percent), whereas only 12 incorporated a sociopolitical assessment using explicit methods (5 percent); and (iii) 50 contained context-specific actionable messages (22 percent). Our interviews identified significant support for both the general idea of an HTA summary and the prototype's specific elements, but mixed views about using peer assessments of relevance.

Conclusions: Those involved in supporting the use of HTAs in policy making about health systems may wish to produce structured decision-relevant summaries for their systematic review-containing HTAs to increase the prospects for their HTAs being used outside the jurisdiction for which they were produced.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1.RN Battista , HD Banta , E Jonsson , M Hodge , H Gelbland . Lessons from the eight countries. Health Policy. 1994;30:397421.

4.R Chou , M Helfand . Challenges in systematic reviews that assess treatment harms. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142 (pt 2):10901099.

5.R Cookson , A Maynard . Health technology assessment in Europe: Improving clarity and performance. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:639650.




10.JM Eisenberg . Ten lessons for evidence-based technology assessment. JAMA. 1999;282:18651869.

12.A Fretheim , S Munabi-Babigumira , AD Oxman , JN Lavis , S Lewin . SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 6: Using research evidence to address how an option will be implemented. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7 (Suppl 1):S6.

13.M Giacomini . The which-hunt: Assembling health technologies for assessment and rationing. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1999;24:715758.

14.CS Goodman , R Ahn . Methodological approaches of health technology assessment. Int J Med Inform. 1999;56:97105.

15.GRADE Working Group. Education and debate: Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:14901494.



18.RB Haynes . bmjupdates+, a new free service for evidence-based clinical practice. Evid Based Nurs. 2005;8:39.

19.RB Haynes , C Cotoi , J Holland , Second-order peer review of the medical literature for clinical practitioners. JAMA. 2006;295:18011808.

20.RB Haynes , J Holland , C Cotoi , McMaster PLUS: A cluster randomized clinical trial of an intervention to accelerate clinical use of evidence-based information from digital libraries. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:593600.

23.E Jonsson , D Banta . Management of health technologies: An international view. BMJ. 1999;319:1293.

24.JN Lavis . How can we support the use of systematic reviews in policymaking? PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000141.

25.JN Lavis , HTO Davies , AD Oxman , Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10 (Suppl 1):S1:35–S1:48.

26.JN Lavis , FB Posada , A Haines , E Osei . Use of research to inform public policymaking. Lancet. 2004;364:16151621.

27.JN Lavis , MG Wilson , AD Oxman , SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 5: Using research evidence to frame options to address a problem. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7 (Suppl 1):S5.

29.P Lehoux , S Blume . Technology assessment and the sociopolitics of health technologies. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2000;25:10831120.

30.P Lehoux , JL Denis , S Tailliez , M Hivon . Dissemination of health technology assessments: Identifying the visions guiding an evolving policy innovation in Canada. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005;30:603641.

36.D Menon , LA Topfer . Health technology assessment in Canada: A decade in review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:896902.

38.AD Oxman , GH Guyatt . A consumers' guide to subgroup analyses. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:7884.

39.M Pignone , S Saha , T Hoerger , KN Lohr , S Teutsch , J Mandelblatt . Challenges in systematic reviews of economic analyses. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142 (pt 2):10731090.

42.M Velasco Garrido , A Gerhardus , JA Røttingen , R Busse . Developing health technology assessment to address health care system needs. Health Policy. 2010;94:196202.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: