Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Tackling ethical issues in health technology assessment: A proposed framework

  • Amanda Burls (a1), Lorraine Caron (a2), Ghislaine Cleret de Langavant (a3), Wybo Dondorp (a4), Christa Harstall (a5), Ela Pathak-Sen (a6) and Bjørn Hofmann (a7)...
Abstract

Objectives: Values are intrinsic to the use of health technology assessments (HTAs) in health policy, but neglecting value assumptions in HTA makes their results appear more robust or normatively neutral than may be the case. Results of a 2003 survey by the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) revealed the existence of disparate methods for making values and ethical issues explicit when conducting HTA.

Methods: An Ethics Working Group, with representation from sixteen agencies, was established to develop a framework for addressing ethical issues in HTA. Using an iterative approach, with email exchanges and face-to-face workshops, a report on Handling Ethical Issues was produced.

Results: This study describes the development process and the agreed upon framework for reflexive ethical analysis that aims to uncover and explore the ethical implications of technologies through an integrated, context-sensitive approach and situates the proposed framework within previous work in the development of ethics analysis in HTA.

Conclusions: It is important that methodological approaches to address ethical reflection in HTA be integrative and context sensitive. The question-based approach described and recommended here is meant to elicit this type of reflection in a way that can be used by HTA agencies. The questions proposed are considered only as a starting point for handling ethics issues, but their use would represent a significant improvement over much of the existing practice.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Tackling ethical issues in health technology assessment: A proposed framework
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Tackling ethical issues in health technology assessment: A proposed framework
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Tackling ethical issues in health technology assessment: A proposed framework
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
1. Beauchamp, TL, Childress, TF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2009.
2. Blancquaert, I, Cleret de Langavant, G, Bouchard, L. L'évaluation des technologies de la santé à l'ère de la génomique. Le défi de la complexité. Ruptures, revue transdisciplinaire en santé. 2002;9:2238.
3. Cleret de Langavant, G. Bioéthique: Méthode et complexité. Québec: Les Presses de l'Université du Québec; 2001.
4. Coyne, JC. Cochrane reviews v industry supported meta-analyses: We should read all reviews with caution. BMJ. 2006;333:916.
5. Daniels, N. Wide reflective equilibrium in practice. In: Daniels, N, ed. Justice and justification. Reflective equilibrium in theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
6. Decker, M. The role of ethics in interdisciplinary technology assessment. Poiesis Prax. 2004;2:139156.
7. Droste, S, Dintsios, CM, Gerber, A. Information on ethical issues in health technology assessment: How and where to find them. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010;26:441449.
8. Droste, S, Gerhardus, A, Kollek, R. Methoden zur Erfassung ethischer Aspekte und gesellschaftlicher Wertvorstellungen in Kurz-HTA-Berichten – eine internationale Bestandsaufnahme. Deutsche Agentur für Health Technology Assessment des Deutschen Instituts für Medizinische Dokumentation und Information (DAHTA@DIMDI), Köln, 2003.
9. EUnetHTA, . HTA core model for medical and surgical interventions, v1.0r. Work Package 4. Helsinki: Finnish Office for HTA; 2008. http://www.eunethta.net/upload/WP4/Final%20Deliverables/HTA%20Core%20Model%20for%20Medical%20and%20Surgical%20Interventions%201%200r.pdf (accessed February 4, 2011).
10. Friedberg, M, Saffran, B, Stinson, TJ, Nelson, W, Bennett, CL. Evaluation of conflict of interest in economic analyses of new drugs used in oncology. JAMA. 1999;282:14531457.
11. Gallo, P. Integrating ethical enquiry and health technology assessment: Limits and opportunities for efficiency and equity. Poiesis Prax. 2004;2:103117.
12. Gillon, R. Philosophical medical ethics. London: John Wiley & Sons; 1986.
13. Grunwald, A. The normative basis of (health) technology assessment and the role of ethical expertise. Poiesis Prax. 2004;2:175193.
14. Health Council of the Netherlands. Ethical aspects of cost-utility analysis. 4th National Ethics Councils in EU Countries, Amsterdam, December 22, 2004.
15. Hofmann, B. Stuck in the middle: The many moral challenges with bariatric surgery. Am J Bioeth. 2010;10:311.
16. Hofmann, B. Towards a procedure for integrating moral issues in HTA. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:312318.
17. Hofmann, B. On value-judgements and ethics in health technology assessment. Poiesis Prax. 2005;3:277295.
18. Hofmann, B. How ethics should be part of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:423429.
19. Hofmann, B. The technological invention of disease [thesis]. Oslo: University of Oslo Press; 2002.
20. INAHTA, . Handling ethical issues in INAHTA agencies. INAHTA Newsletter, March 2003. www.inahta.org/upload/Newsletters/Newsletter%20Jan-Mar%2003.pdf (accessed February 4, 2011).
21. INAHTA Ethics Working Group. INAHTA's Working Group on Handling Ethical Issues. Final Report, June 2005, pp. 1-21. www.inahta.org/upload/Final%20report%20Ethics%20in%20HTA%20Nov%2007.pdf (accessed February 4, 2011).
22. Johri, M, Lehoux, P. The great escape? Prospects for regulating access to technology through health technology assessment. Intl J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19:179193.
23. Juni, P, Altman, DG, Egger, M. Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001;323:4246.
24. Lehoux, P, Daudelin, G, Demers-Payette, O, Boivin, A. Fostering deliberations about health innovation: What do we want to know from publics? Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:20022009.
25. Leventhal, E, Brodin, H, Gabbay, J. The incorporation of ethics in health technology assessments – a new conceptual framework. A report for the NHS NCCHTA based on a Masters dissertation for an MSc in International Health Policy, University of Southampton, 2004.
26. Leys, M. Health technology assessment: The contribution of qualitative research. Intl J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19:317329.
27. Molewijk, AC, Stiggelbout, AM, Otten, W, Dupuis, HM, Kievit, J. Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: A plea for integrated empirical ethics research. Health Care Anal. 2003;11:6992.
28. Oortwijn, W. First things first: Priority setting for health technology assessment (dissertation). University of Amsterdam; 2000; 207.
29. Reuzel, RPB. Interactive technology assessment of paediatric cochlear implantation. Poiesis Prax. 2004;2:119137.
30. Reuzel, RPB. Health Technology assessment and interactive evaluation. Different perspectives. Nijmegen University; 2001.
31. Reuzel, R, van der Wilt, GJ, ten have, HA, de Vries Robbe, PF. Reducing normative bias in health technology assessment: Interactive evaluation and casuistry. Med Health Care Philos 1999;2:255263.
32. Sandercock, J, Burls, A, Hyde, C, et al. Riluzole for motor neurone disease. More trials are needed. BMJ. 2001;322:1305.
33. Schultz, KF, Chalmers, I, Hayes, R, Altman, DJ. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273:408412.
34. Stewart, A, Sandercock, J, Bryan, S, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of riluzole for motor neurone disease: A rapid and systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:197.
35. Strech, D, Tilburt, J. Value judgments in the analysis and synthesis of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:521524.
36. ten Have, H. Ethical perspectives on health technology assessment. Intl J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:7176.
37. Van der Wilt, GJ. Health technology assessment: Trying to bring empirical and ethical inquiry together. Poiesis Prax. 2004;2:195206.
38. Weingarten, MA, Paul, M, Leibovici, L. Assessing ethics of trials in systematic reviews. BMJ. 2004;328:10131014.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed