Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-jtdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T12:49:06.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using the Evidence: A Need for Quantity, Not Quality?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

C. J. Hyde
C. J. Hyde
Affiliation:
The U.K. Cochrane Centre
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The use of research evidence depends on more than its quality. If one considers other factors that influence the use of evidence, the quantity of accessible evidence and initiatives ensuring a wider understanding of it must be equally important. In consequence, improving the quality of research evidence alone will not necessarily lead to its greater use.

Information

Type
Special Section: The Quality of the Medical Evidence: Is It Good Enough?
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , Spring 1996 , pp. 280 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Adams, C. E., Power, A., Frederick, K., & Lefebvre, C.An investigation of the adequacy of MEDLINE searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effects of mental health care. Psychological Medicine, 1994, 24, 741–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Anderson, F. A., Wheeler, H. B., Goldberg, R. J., et al. Physician practices in the prevention of venous thromboembolism. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1991, 115, 591–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Antman, E. M., Lau, J., Kupelnick, B., et al. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts: Treatments for myocardial infarction. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1992, 268, 240–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Chalmers, I.“Applying overviews and meta-analyses at the bedside": Discussion. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995, 48, 67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Chalmers, I., & Haynes, B. Reporting, updating, and correcting systematic reviews of the effects of health care. British Medical Journal, 1994, 309, 862–65. Updated version in Chalmers, I. & Altman, D. G. (eds.), Systematic reviews. London: BMJ Publishing, 1995.Google Scholar
6.Critical Appraisal Skills Project. Orientation guide. Oxford: Institute of Health Sciences, 1995.Google Scholar
7.Davis, D. A., Thomson, M. A., Oxman, A. D., & Haynes, R. B.Evidence for the effectiveness of CME: A review of 50 randomized controlled trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1992, 268, 1111–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Dickersin, K., & Min, Y-I.Publication bias: The problem that won't go away. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1993, 703, 135–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Dickersin, K., Scherer, R., & Lefebvre, C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 1994, 309, 1286–91. Updated version in Chalmers, I. & Altman, D. G. (eds.), Systematic reviews. London: BMJ Publishing, 1995.Google Scholar
10.Dunning, M., McQuay, H., & Milne, R.Getting a GRiP. Health Service Journal, 1994, 104, 24–26.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Effective health care: Implementing clinical practice guidelines: Can guidelines be us to improve clinical practice? Bulletin no. 8. Leeds: University of Leeds, 1994.Google Scholar
12.Egger, M., & Davey Smith, G.Misleading meta-analysis: Lessons from ‘an effective, safe, simple’ intervention that wasn't. British Medical Journal, 1995, 310, 752–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Fox, R., Mazmanian, P., & Putnam, R. W.Changing and learning in the lives of physicians. New York: Praeger, 1989.Google Scholar
14.Freemantle, N., Grilli, R., Grimshaw, J., & Oxman, A.Implementing findings of medical research: The Cochrane Collaboration on Effective Professional Practice. Quality in Health Care, 1995, 4, 45–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Grahame-Smith, D.Evidence based medicine: Socratic dissent. British Medical Journal, 1995, 310, 1126–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Grimshaw, J. M., & Russell, I. T.Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: A systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet, 1993, 342, 1317–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Haines, A., & Jones, R.Implementing findings of research. British Medical Journal, 1994, 308, 1488–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Haynes, R. B.Some problems in applying evidence in clinical practice. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1993, 703, 210–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Haynes, R. B., Johnston, M. E., McKibbon, K. A., & Walker, C. J. A randomized controlled trial of a program to enhance clinical use of MEDLINE. Online Journal of Current Clinical Trials, 1993, Doc. no. 56.Google Scholar
20.Hyde, C. J.Advising on the introduction of the drug Exosurf in Norwich Health Authority. Dissertation submitted for membership of the Faculty of Public Health Medicine, 1994.Google Scholar
21.ISIS-4 Collaborative Group. ISIS-4: A randomised factorial trial assessing early captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58,050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet, 1995, 345, 669–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Kassirer, J. P.Dissemination of medical information: A journal's role. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1993, 703, 173–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Ketley, D., & Woods, K. L.Impact of clinical trials on clinical practice: Example of thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. Lancet, 1993, 342, 891–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Last, J. (ed.). A dictionary of epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
25.Lomas, J.Retailing research: Increasing the role of evidence in clinical services for child-birth. Milbank Quarterly, 1993, 71, 439–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Lomas, J., Anderson, G. M., Domnick-Pierre, K., et al. Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. New England Journal of Medicine, 1989, 321, 1306–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Louis, T. A., Fineberg, H. V., & Mosteller, F.Findings for public health from meta-analyses. Annual Review of Public Health, 1985, 6, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Mulrow, C. D.The medical review article: State of the science. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1987, 106, 485–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.NHS Executive. Improving the effectiveness of the NHS. Leeds: Department of Health, 1994, EL (94) 74.Google Scholar
30.NHS Management Executive. Improving clinical effectiveness. Leeds: Department of Health, 1993, EL (93) 115.Google Scholar
31.Oxman, A. D. Checklists for review articles. British Medical Journal, 1994, 309, 648–51. Updated version in Chalmers, I. & Altman, D. G. (eds.), Systematic reviews. London: BMJ Publishing, 1995.Google Scholar
32.Oxman, A. D., & Guyatt, G. H.The science of reviewing research. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1993, 703, 125–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Rogers, E. M.Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press, 1983.Google Scholar
34.Rosenberg, W., & Donald, A.Evidence based medicine: An approach to clinical problem solving. British Medical Journal, 1995, 310, 1126–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35.Sackett, D. L.Applying overviews and meta-analyses at the bedside. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995, 48, 61–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.Sackett, D. L., Haynes, R. B., Guyatt, G. H., & Tugwell, P.Clinical epidemiology: A basic science for clinical medicine. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1991.Google Scholar
37.Schulz, K. F., Chalmers, I., Hayes, R. J., & Altman, D. G.Empirical evidence of bias: Dimensions of methological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1995, 273, 408–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Walt, G.How far does research influence policy? European Journal of Public Health, 1994, 4, 233–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Williamson, J. W., German, P. S., Weiss, R., et al. Health science information management and continuing education of physicians: A survey of U.S. primary care practitioners and their opinion leaders. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1989, 110, 151–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.Wyatt, J.Use and sources of medical knowledge. Lancet, 1991, 338, 1368–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Yusuf, S., Koon, T., & Woods, K.Intravenous magnesium in acute myocardial infarction: An effective, safe, simple, and inexpensive intervention. Circulation, 1993, 87, 2043–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed