7.Borah, R, Brown, AW, Capers, PL, Kaiser, KA. Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e012545.
8.Alton, V, Eckerlund, I, Norlund, A. Health economic evaluations: How to find them. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22:512-517.
9.Pitt, C, Goodman, C, Hanson, K. Economic evaluation in global perspective: A bibliometric analysis of the recent literature. Health Econ. 2016;25(Suppl 1):9-28.
10.Royle, P, Waugh, N. Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(34):iii, ix-x, 1-51.
11.Sassi, F, Archard, L, McDaid, D. Searching literature databases for health care economic evaluations: How systematic can we afford to be? Med Care. 2002;40:387-394.
13.Shemilt, I, Mugford, M, Byford, S, et al. Incorporating economics evidence. In: Higgins, JPT, Green, S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. 449-80 www.handbook.cochrane.org (accessed September 30, 2018).
14.Wood, H, Arber, M, Glanville, JM. Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: How extensive are their searches? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017;33:25-31.
15.Briscoe, S, Cooper, C, Glanville, J, Lefebvre, C. The loss of the NHS EED and DARE databases and the effect on evidence synthesis and evaluation. Res Synth Methods. 2017;8:256-257.
16.Thielen, FW, Van Mastrigt, G, Burgers, LT, et al. How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for clinical practice guidelines: Database selection and search strategy development (part 2/3). Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;16:705-721.
17.Kaunelis, D, Glanville, J. Costs and economic evaluation. Summarized research in information retrieval for HTA. 2018. http://vortal.htai.org/?q=sure-info (accessed September 30, 2018).
18.Kaunelis, D, Farrah, K. Appraisal of: Pitt, C, Goodman, C, Hanson, K. Economic evaluation in global perspective: A bibliometric analysis of the recent literature. Health Econ. 2016;25(Suppl 1):9-28.
19.Sampson, M, Zhang, L, Morrison, A, et al. An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: Validating methodological search filters using relative recall. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:33.
20.Aagaard, T, Lund, H, Juhl, C. Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - Are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:161.
21.Ayiku, L, Levay, P, Hudson, T, et al. The medline UK filter: Development and validation of a geographic search filter to retrieve research about the UK from OVID medline. Health Info Libr J. 2017. doi:10.1111/hir.12187.
22.Selva, A, Sola, I, Zhang, Y, et al. Development and use of a content search strategy for retrieving studies on patients’ views and preferences. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15:126.
25.Lam, MT, De Longhi, C, Turnbull, J, Lam, HR, Besa, R. Has Embase replaced MEDLINE since coverage expansion? J Med Libr Assoc. 2018;106:227-234.
26.Lefebvre, C, Manheimer, E, Glanville, JM. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins, JPT, Green, S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions [Version 5.1.0] [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. http://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/.
27.Duffy, S, de Kock, S, Misso, K, et al. Supplementary searches of PubMed to improve currency of MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process searches via Ovid. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104:309-312.
29.McGowan, J, Sampson, M, Salzwedel, DM, et al. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40-6.
30.Meert, D, Torabi, N, Costella, J. Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104:267-277.
31.Koffel, JB. Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: A cross-sectional survey of recent authors. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0125931.
32.Rethlefsen, ML, Farrell, AM, Osterhaus Trzasko, LC, Brigham, TJ. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:617-626.