Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wlg5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T05:03:34.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Importance of taxonomy in biological control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Gilberto J. de Moraes
Gilberto J. de Moraes
Affiliation:
Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuraria do Tropico SemiArido (CPTSA)/EMBRAPA, 56300-Petrolina, PE, Brazil
Get access

Abstract

Taxonomy is the starting point of any basic or applied biological research. In biological control work, the pest species, its probable area of origin, and, consequently, the location where promising natural enemies may be found, are identified. The close co-operation of taxonomists during pre- and post-release surveys of natural enemies in target areas helps to indicate the indigenous fauna present and the progress of a biological control programme. Biological control programmes should budget for appropriate taxonomie studies in areas where the local fauna is poorly known. Instructing local researchers on the correct collection, preservation, and identification of relevant indigenous and exotic species should be emphasized.

Résumé

La taxonomie est le point de départ de toute recherche biologique fondamentale ou appliquée. Dans le cadre de la lutte biologique, son étude permet, lorsqu'elle est correctement menée, d'identifier les différentes espèces de ravageurs, leur lieu d'origine éventuel et, par conséquent, les sites où l'on a le plus de chance de trouver des ennemis naturels prometteurs. La collaboration étroite des taxonomistes au cours des enquétes antérieures et ultérieures aux lâchers d'ennemis naturels dans les zones cibles permet d'évaluer la réussite du programme de lutte biologique. Dans les régions où l'on possède peu de données précises sur la faune locale, les programmes de lutte biologique doivent prévoir dans leur budget une étude taxonomique. L'importance de la formation, au niveau local, de chercheurs aptes à identifier les espèces indigènes et exotiques devrait être soulignée.

Keywords

Taxonomyclassificationidentificationbiological controlbiosystematicsTaxonomieclassificationidentificationlutte biologiquebiosystématique

Information

Type
Symposium XI: Africa-wide Biological Control Programme of Cassava Pests
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 8 , Issue 4-5-6: Recent Advances in Research on Tropical Entomology , December 1987 , pp. 841 - 844
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Chant, D. A., Hansell, R. I. C. and Rowell, H. J. (1977) An analysis of interspecific and intraspecific morphological differences in two closely related species of Amblyseius Berlese using methods of numerical taxonomy (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. Ent. 109, 1605–1618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, C. P. (1942) The relationship of taxonomy to biological control. J. econ. Em. 35, 744–748.Google Scholar
Clausen, C. P., ed. (1978) Introduced parasites and predators of arthropod pests and weeds: a world review. U.S. Dept. Agric. Handbk. 480, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Cox, J. M. and Williams, D. J. (1981) An account of cassava mealybugs (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) with a description of a new species. Bull. Ent. Res. 71, 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, B. A. (1970) Competitive studies on four strains of Typhlodromus occidentalis Nesbitt (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). I. Hybridization and reproductive isolation studies. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63, 1558–1563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. M. (1970) Variations in the anatomy of Typhlodromus occidentalis. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63, 696–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBach, P. (1974) Biological Control by Natural Enemies. Cambridge Univ. Press. U.K.Google Scholar
Eickwort, G. C. (1983) Recommendations for future basic research on mites as biological control agents. In Biological Control of Pests by Mites (Edited by Hoy, M. A., Cunningham, G. L. and Knutson, L.), pp. 172–173. Univ. California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, D., Gordh, G., Thompson, S. N. and Adler, J. (1979) Biotype discrimination and its importance to biological control. In Genetics in Relation to Insect Management, pp. 129–136. Rockefeller Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
Hoying, S. A. and Croft, B. A. (1977) Comparisons between populations of Typhlodromus longipilus Nesbitt and T. occidentalis Nesbitt: Taxonomy, distribution and hybridization. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 70, 150–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LePelley, R. H. (1943) The biological control of a mealybug on coffee and other crops in Kenya. Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 11, 78–88.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1969) Principles of Systematic Zoology. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Muma, M. H. and Denmark, H. A. (1962) Intraspecific variation in Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Florida Ent. 45, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muma, M. H. and Denmark, H. A. (1969) Sibling species of Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Florida Ent. 52, 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlinger, E. I. and Doutt, R. L. (1964) Systematics in relation to biological control. In Biological Control of Pest Insects and Weeds (Edited by DeBach, P.), Reinhold Pubi. Corp., New York.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. (1961) Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smiley, R. L. and Knutson, L. (1983) Aspects of taxonomie research and services relative to mites as biological control agents. In Biological Control of Pests by Mites (Edited by Hoy, M. A., Cunningham, G. L. and Knutson, L.), pp. 148–164. Univ. California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Yaninek, J. S. (1984) Recognizing and identifying phytophagous and predaceous mites found on cassava. In Integrated Pest Management of Cassava Green Mile (Edited by Greathead, A. H., Markham, R. H., Murphy, R. G., Murphy, S. T. and Robertson, I. A. D.) Proceedings of a regional workshop in East Africa, 30 April-4 May 1984. Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control.Google Scholar
Yaseen, M. (1986) Exploration for natural enemies of Phenacoccus manihoti and Mononychellus tanajoa: The challenge, the achievements. In Biological Control and Host Plant Resistance to Control the Cassava Mealybug and Green Mite in Africa. Proc. of International Workshop (Edited by Herren, H. R. and Hennessey, R. N.) December 1982, IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria (in press).Google Scholar