Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:13:35.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of Insecticides on Cotton in Zambia: Comparison of Application Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

I. Javaid
I. Javaid
Affiliation:
University of Zambia, School of Agricultural Sciences, P. O. Box 32379, Lusaka, Zambia
Get access

Abstract

The insecticide application techniques on cotton were compared in a series of trials. The new techniques compared well with knapsack sprayers and can play an important role in the control of Heliothis and other insect pests of cotton in Zambia. The ‘Electrodyn’ knapsack and ULV sprayers gave similar yields and pest control with cypermethrin at 30 g a.i./ha. A new pyrethroid lambda cyhalothrin (12 g a.i./ha) gave similar yields to cypermethrin (30 g a.i./ha) irrespective of the spraying techniques (Electrodyn, knapsack and ULV). The new application techniques have more potential for small-scale cotton farmers in developing countries as they receive limited training on the dilution of insecticides with water and calibration of knapsack sprayers.

Résumé

Les techniques d'application d'insecticides étaient comparées dans un série d'essais. Les nouvelles techniques semblaient favorables comparées aux pulvérisateurs dorsales et peuvent jouer une rôle importante dans la lutte contre Heliothis et d'autres insectes nuisibles au cotonn Zambie. Le pulvérisateurs Electrodyn, le pulvérisateur dorsal et les pulvérisateurs ULV donnaient des récoltes comparables, aussi bien que des contrôles semblables avec cypermethrin à 30 g a. j./ha. Une nouvelle pyréthroide lambda cyhalothrin (12 g a.j./ha) donnait des récoltes semblables a cypermethrin (30 g a.j./ha) indépendant de la technique d'application (Electrodyn, dorsal, et ULV). Les nouvelles techniques d'application ont un potential important pour les cultivateurs de coton a petite échelle dans les pays en voie de développement, puisqu'ils ne reçoivent qu'un entrainement limité concernant la dilution d'insecticides avec de l'eau et dans la calibration des pulverisateurs dorsales.

Keywords

HeliothisElectrodynULVknapsackcypermethrinlambda cyhalothrinsmall-scale farmerscottonZambiaHeliothisElectrodynULVdorsalcypermethrinlambda cyhalothrincultivateurs a petite échellecotonZambie
Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 12 , Issue 1-2-3: Current Topics in Tropical Entomology , June 1991 , pp. 111 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anonymous (1984) Cotton Research Information. Main Results for 1981–1984. Magoye Regional Research Station. Ministry of Agriculture and Water Development.Google Scholar
Arnold, A. J. and Pye, B. J. (1980) Spray application with charged rotary atomisers. Bri. Crop Prot. Monograph No. 24, 109–117.Google Scholar
Bohlen, E. (1982) Cotton Pests in Africa. Lint Company of Zambia Ltd. Lusaka in Cooperation with Agro Progress Gmbh. Consulting Engineers. D-5300 Bonn, West Germany.Google Scholar
Cauquil, J. (1987) Cotton—pest control: a review of the introduction of ultra-low volume (ULV) spraying in sub-Saharan French speaking Africa. Crop Prot. 6, 38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, R. A. (1979) Electrodynamic energy—a new approach to pesticide application. Proc. Brit. Crop Prot. Conference—Pests and Diseases, pp. 777–789.Google Scholar
Coffee, R. A. (1981) Electrodynamic crop spraying. Outlook on Agriculture 10, 350–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felici, N. J. (1967) Electrostatic and Electrostatic Engineering. Inst. Phys. Conf. Series 4, London.Google Scholar
Javaid, I. (1987) Studies of the application of insecticides on cotton in Zambia. Ph. D. thesis, University of Zambia.Google Scholar
King, W. J. (1976) Ultra Low Volume application of insecticides to cotton in Gambia. CORP MISC Rep. 27, 13.Google Scholar
Litsinger, J. A., Price, E. C. and Herrera, R. T. (1978) Small scale farmer pest control practices for rainfed rice, corn and grain legumes in three Philippine Provinces. Philippine Entomol. 4, 65–86.Google Scholar
Lodeman, E. G. (1896) The Spraying of Plants. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Lyon, D. J.de, B. (1975) Cotton Research Reports, Zambia, Cotton Research Corp. London. 1972–1973, 3–10, 25–32.Google Scholar
Mambiri, A. M. (1987) Evaluation of some crop sprayers in the application of insecticides on cotton in Kenya. Trop. Pest Manage. 33, 189–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, G. A. (1973a) Ultra-low volume spraying on cotton in Malawi. Cotton Grow. Rev. 50, 242–267.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. A. (1973b) Ultra-low volume spray application on cotton in Malawi. PANS 19, 48–53.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. A. (1979) Pesticides Application Methods, Longman.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. A. (1981) Developments in pesticide application for the small scale farmers in the tropics. Outlook on Agriculture 10, 345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, G. A. (1982a) Pesticide application in tropics. Proc. Int. Conf. Plant Prot. in Tropics, pp. 671–679.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. A. (1982b) New developments in pesticide application technology. Crop Prot. I, 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, G. A. (1985) Pest control equipment used by small scale farmers in developing countries. Presented at Int. Conf. on Agricultural Equipment for Developing Countries. IRRI, Manila, Philippines.Google Scholar
Morton, N. (1981) The Electrodyn sprayer: control of Heliothis spp. in cotton. Proc. Bri. Crop Prot. Conf. Pests and Diseases pp. 891–901.Google Scholar
Nyirenda, G. K. C. (1986) Studies of the effects of insecticide application on cotton in Malawi. Ph. D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Smith, R. K. (1986) New pesticide application technologies and the “Electrodyn” sprayer. Paper presented at the IV Encontro Nacional de Fitossanitaristas (IV ENFIT-IV National Plant Health Seminar).Google Scholar