Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:57:50.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strategies for integrated cotton pest control in the Sudan. 1 — Cultural and legislative measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

El Tigani M. El Amin
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Corporation, Wad Medani, Sudan
Musa A. Ahmed
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Corporation, Wad Medani, Sudan
Get access

Abstract

Commercial cotton growing in the Sudan dates from 1867. At present, about 400,000 ha of various cotton cultivars are grown under different irrigation systems. The production of this main cash crop has been faced with a multitude of entomological and pathological problems, some of which were tackled through the adoption of specific cultural practices or enforcement of legislative regulations.

When cotton treatment with synthetic organic insecticides was initiated in the mid 1940s against Empoasca lybica de Berg, the impressive preliminary results have encouraged over-reliance on chemical control at the expense of other measures. This rather limited approach of control strategy has contributed partially to the appearance of new pests in damaging levels e.g. Heliothis armigera (Hbn.), Bemisia tabaci (Genn), Aphis gossypii (Glov) and Spodoptera littoralis. The principal measure for their control is insecticide application.

The cost of crop protection soared to ten-fold during the last 20 years. The annual number of sprays applied to cotton increased from one to seven sprays. To overcome the ever increasing use and high costs of pesticides on cotton growing, the Agricultural Research Corporation undertook intensive research programmes to find answers to major crop protection problems. Since 1978 researchers are directing their efforts towards the development and implementation of integrated pest management strategies to include cultural and legislative measures, as well as the use of more selective insecticides.

Résumé

La culture du coton au Soudan en tant que produit de rente date de 1867. Actuellement, plus de 400.000 hectares sont cultivés avec differentes variétés et sous divers systèmes d'irrigation.

La production de cette principale culture de rente est confrontée à de multiples problèmes entomologiques et phytopathologiques pouvant être combattus à travers l'adoption de pratiques culturales ou le renforcement de règies législatives.

Lorsque le traitement du coton avec des insecticides organiques de synthèse fut initiée contre Empoasca lybica De Derg au milieu des années 1940, les résultats préliminaires ont été impressionnants et ont encouragé la lutte chimique exclusivement aux dépens des autres mesures.

Cette approche plutôt limitée dans une stratégie de lutte aura contribué partiellement à l'apparition de ravageurs à desniveaux de dégats économiques, comme par exemple, Heliothis armigera (Hbn), Bemisia tabaci (Genn), Aphis gossypii (Glov) et Spodoptera littoralis. La principale méthode de lutte appliquée a été encore la lutte chimique.

Le cout de production a augmenté de 10 fois au cours des 20 dernières années. Le nombre d'applications insecticides par campagne est passé de 1 à 7.

A fin de contenir l'emploi toujours croissant des pesticides et leur cout élevé, la Recherche Agronomique a entrepris de programmes intensifs pour trouver des réponses aux problèmes majeurs de la culture. Depuis 1978, les chercheurs ont orienté leurs efforts vers le développement et l'application d'une stratégie de lutte intégrée incluant aussi bien des pratiques culturales et des mesures législatives que l'emploi d'insecticides plus sélectifs.

Type
Part I: Symposium on Integrated Pest Management and Environmental Conservation: Pest Management Strategies and Practices
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abdel Rahman, A. A. and Eveleens, K. G. (1979) Cotton pest management in the Sudan. Working Paper for the 9th Session FAO/UNEP Panel of Experts on IPC, Wad Medani, Sudan, December 1979.Google Scholar
Abdel Rahman, A. A. and Saleem, M. B. A. (19761978) Ann. Reporyt 1976–78, Entomol. Section, Gezira Res. Station, Agric. Res. Wad Medani, Sudan.Google Scholar
Balla, A. N. (1978) Studies on the American Boll worm Heliothis armigera in the Sudan Gezira. Proceedings of a Symposium on Crop Pest Management, Ministry of Agriculture, Khartoum.Google Scholar
Balla, A. N. (1982) Progress in research and development for Heliothis management in the Sudan. Proceedings of the International Workshop of Heliothis Management. November 1981, Palancherm, India.Google Scholar
Brader, L. (1976) Development of integrated pest control research in the Sudan. International Study Workshop on Research and Agricultural Development in the Sudan, November 1976, Ministry of Agriculture, Khartoum.Google Scholar
Eveleens, K. G. and El Amin, E. M. (1978) Status of cotton insect pests in the Sudan and identification of research needs for development and application of IPC, 8th Session of FAO/UNEP Panel of Experts on IPC, Rome, September 1978.Google Scholar
El Amin, E. M. and El Amin, E. M. (1980) On the occurrence of insect pests of arable weeds in the Sudan Gezira. Proceedings of a Symposium of Weed Research in the Sudan. November 1979 (Volume 2), University of Hohenheim, Instit. Phytomed. Stuttgart, W. Germany, pp. 2527.Google Scholar
El Amin, A. M. and Balla, A. N. (1983) Insect pest problems of cotton in the Sudan and management of Heliothis armigera. Proceedings Symposium on Integrated Pest Control for Cotton in the Near East. September 1983, Adana, Turkey.Google Scholar
Gameel, O. I. (1969) Studies on whitefly parasites Encarsia lutea Masi and Eretmocerus mundus Mercet. (Hymenoptera, Aphelidae). Rev. Zool. Bat. Afr. LXXIX, 1–2, pp. 6577.Google Scholar
Gumings, Charles Sir and Bennett, Cecil H. A. (1955) The agricultural pests prevention ordinance. The Laws of the Sudan (revised edition May 1955) Vol. 5, 197206.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. V. J. (1955) Cotton spraying in the Sudan Gezira. FAO Plant Prot. Bull. 3, 8692 and 97–103.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. V. J. (1959) The yield response of cotton in the Sudan Gezira to DDT spray. Bull. Entomol. Res. 50, 577594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gameel, Khalifa H. O. I. and Balla, A. N. (1979) Breeding for insect pest resistance in cotton. 9th Session of FAO/UNEP Panel of Experts on IPC, Wad Medani, Sudan. December 1979.Google Scholar
Mound, L. A. (1965) Effect of leaf hair on cotton whitefly population in Sudan Gezira. Emp. Cotton Grow. Rev. 42, 3340.Google Scholar
Ripper, W. G. and George, L. (1965) Cotton Pests of the Sudan. Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Schmutterer, H. (1969) Pests of Crops inNortheast and Central Africa. Gustav Verlag-Stuttgart, W. Germany.Google Scholar
Sippel, D. W., Bundra, O. S. and Khalifa, H. (1983) Resistance to whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Genn.) in cotton in the Sudan. Working Paper No. 10, FAO/UNEP/IPC-Project in cotton, Gezira Research Station, Wad Medani. GCP/SUD/025/NET.Google Scholar
Snow, O. W. and Taylor, J. (1952) The large scale control of the cotton jassid in the Gezira and white Nile areas of the Sudan. Bull. Entomol. Res. 43, 479502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tothill, J. D. (1948) Agriculture in the Sudan. Oxford University Press, Goffry Cumbelege, London.Google Scholar
Topper, C. (1978) The incidence of Heliothis armigera larvae and adults on groundnuts and sorghum and the prediction of oviposition on cotton. Third Seminar for the Strategy of Cotton Pest Control in the Sudan. Ciba-Geigy, Basel, Swiss, 1978.Google Scholar