Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T04:22:47.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Netherlands v. Nuhanović

The Netherlands.  06 September 2013 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

International organizations — Responsibility — Attribution of acts to international organization or to States — United Nations — Peacekeeping mission — United Nations Security Council establishing United Nations Protection Force (“UNPROFOR”) — Security Council Resolution 743 (1992) — Peacekeeping mission of UNPROFOR extending to Bosnia and Herzegovina

State responsibility — Attribution — National contingent in United Nations force — State placing troops at disposal of United Nations — Dutch battalion contingent in UNPROFOR — Alleged wrongful conduct of contingent — Whether attributable to State — Whether attributable to United Nations — Whether attributable to both State and United Nations — Assessment in accordance with international law — United Nations International Law Commission — 2001 Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts — 2011 Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations — Decisive criterion for attribution — Factual control — Whether Court of Appeal incorrectly applying or interpreting effective control criterion — Context for alleged conduct — Whether alleged conduct unlawful — Bosnian law — Principles laid down in Articles 2 and 3 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 (“European Convention”) and Articles 6 and 7 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966 (“ICCPR”) — Whether State liable for damages

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Customary international law — European Convention, Articles 2 and 3 — ICCPR, Articles 6 and 7 — Right to life — Prohibition of inhuman treatment — Whether State having requisite jurisdiction within meaning of Article 1 of European Convention and Article 2(1) of ICCPR — Case law of European Court of Human Rights — Law of Bosnia and Herzegovina applicable in accordance with Dutch international private law — Assessment of wrongful conduct — Whether assessment of Court of Appeal correct — Whether any basis for exercise of judicial restraint

Jurisdiction — Treaties — European Convention, Article 1 — ICCPR, Article 2(1) — Whether State having jurisdiction — Whether jurisdiction required to assess disputed conduct by reference to Articles 2 and 3 of European Convention and Articles 6 and 7 of ICCPR — Case law of European Court of Human Rights — Whether State competent through its battalion contingent to exercise jurisdiction — State’s battalion contingent forming part of UNPROFOR — Agreement on the Status of UNPROFOR in Bosnia and Herzegovina — Whether sufficient basis for view of State’s ability to ensure compliance with human rights enshrined in Articles 2 and 3 of European Convention and Articles 6 and 7 of ICCPR — The law of the Netherlands

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)