Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-plnhv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-08-11T18:31:07.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

United States: District Court for the Northern District of California Stipulation and Final Judgment in United States v. Bechtel Corporation (Foreign Boycotts; Exclusion of Blacklisted Persons; U.S. Antitrust Act)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , January 1977 , pp. 95 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Reproduced from the text providedby the U.S. Department of Justice.

[The stipulation and proposed judgment were filed at the U.S. District Court in San Franciscoon January 10, 1977. The public may file comments with the Court and the Department of Justice regarding the proposed judgment within 60 days.

[ In accordance with the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act of 1974, acompetitive impact statement regarding the proposed judgment has been filed with the Court . That statement appearsat I.L.M. page 106.]

References

* / When terms are used in this C.I.S. that are defined in Section II of the proposed Final Judgment, the definition appearing there shall also apply here. Such- terms will appear in both documents with initial capital letters.

* / As used here and in the proposed Find Judgment, Subcontractors are businesses which sell goods as well as services lor use in Major Construction Projects. Thus, for example, a manufacturer of steel or electronic equipment which is purchased for use in a Major Construction Project would bi? n Subcontractor, as would- an electrical contractor which installs wiring and circuitry. Subcontractors in some cases ontor into contractual relationships directly with Clients. However, the Prime Contractor usually has a substantial role in the Subcontractor selection process in those situations as well.

* [I.L.M. pages 112-113 and 117-118 above.]