We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 September 2023
The growth of access to the internet, wide availability of smart phones and increased public access to remote sensing data from hundreds of satellite systems have spurred a revolution in tracking the linkages between armed conflict and environmental damage. Over the last decade, a growing community of open-source investigative experts, environmentalists, academics and civil society groups have applied these methods to document war crimes, human rights violations and environmental degradation. These developments have created new opportunities for building accountability and transparency. The wealth of data on conflict-linked environmental damage has already been successfully leveraged to address acute and long-term environmental health risks and inform humanitarian response and post-conflict environmental assessments in Iraq, Syria and Ukraine. There are, however, larger questions on how to best make use of these data streams and information layers, and how to navigate the opportunities and limitations of these developments. This article will outline the new developments in this field and provide recommendations to ensure that data is used responsibly and effectively to strengthen accountability for environmental damages as a result of armed conflict.
Wim Zwijnenburg is a long-time contributor to Bellingcat, an open-source research collective. Ollie Ballinger is a Tech Fellow at Bellingcat.
The advice, opinions and statements contained in this article are those of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views of the ICRC. The ICRC does not necessarily represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement or other information provided in this article.
1 David Jensen and Silja Halle, Protecting the Environment during Armed Conflict: An Inventory and Analysis of International Law, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2009.
2 Conca, Ken and Wallace, Jennifer, “Environment and Peacebuilding in War-torn Societies: Lessons from the UN Environment Programme's Experience with Post-Conflict Assessment”, Global Governance, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: www.jstor.org/stable/27800777 (all internet references were accessed in September 2023).
3 Official Records of the General Assembly, Sixty-Sixth Session, Supp. No. 10, UN Doc. A/66/10 and Add.1, 2011, para. 365.
4 See the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons, available at: www.icbuw.eu/en/about-us/.
5 See the Vietnam Agent Orange Relief and Responsibility Campaign, available at: https://vn-agentorange.org.
6 PAX, Laid to Waste: Depleted Uranium Contaminated Military Scrap in Iraq, June 2014, available at: https://paxforpeace.nl/media/download/pax-rapport-iraq-final-lowres-spread.pdf.
7 Christina Roca, “How the Syrian War Changed How War Crimes Are Documented”, The New Humanitarian, 1 June, 2017, available at: https://deeply.thenewhumanitarian.org/syria/articles/2017/06/01/long-read-how-the-syrian-war-changed-how-war-crimes-are-documented.
8 Deutch, Jeff and Habal, Hadi, “The Syrian Archive: A Methodological Case Study of Open-Source Investigation of State Crime Using Video Evidence from Social Media Platforms”, State Crime Journal, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.13169/statecrime.7.1.0046.
9 Rohde, Markus et al., “Out of Syria: Mobile Media in Use at the Time of Civil War”, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, Vol. 32, No. 7, 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10447318.2016.1177300.
10 Müller, Nina C. and Wiik, Jenny, “From Gatekeeper to Gate-opener: Open-Source Spaces in Investigative Journalism”, Journalism Practice, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2023CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1919543.
11 Higgins, Eliot, We Are Bellingcat: An Intelligence Agency for the People, Bloomsbury, London, 2021Google Scholar.
12 See, for example, the New York Times Visual Investigations team, available at: www.nytimes.com/spotlight/visual-investigations-award-winning; Mandal Chinula, “BBC Team Shares Insights behind Viral, Open-Source Investigation”, International Journalist Network, 17 December 2018, available at: https://ijnet.org/en/story/bbc-team-shares-insights-behind-viral-open-source-investigation.
13 ICC, Warrant of Arrest: The Prosecutor v. Mahmoud Mustafa Busayf Al-Werfalli, ICC-01/11-02/17-2, 15 August 2017, available at: www.icc-cpi.int/court-record/icc-01/11-01/17-2.
14 Toby McIntosh, “Environmental Crime and Climate Change”, in Reporter's Guide to Investigating Organized Crime, Global Investigative Journalism Network, 2023, available at: https://gijn.org/organized-crime-chapter-7-environmental-crimes/.
15 Wim Zwijnenburg and Eliot Higgins, “Online Identification of Conflict Related Environmental Damage”, Bellingcat, 17 December 2015, available at: www.bellingcat.com/resources/how-tos/2015/12/17/online-identification-of-conflict-related-environmental-damage-a-beginners-guide/.
16 Leo Posthuma et al., “The Flash Environmental Assessment Tool: Worldwide First Aid for Chemical Accidents, Response, Pro Action Prevention and Preparedness”, Environment International, Vol. 72, November 2014, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.04.018.
17 PAX, Amidst the Debris: A Desktop Study on the Environmental and Public Health Impact of Syria's Conflict, October 2015, available at: https://paxforpeace.nl/what-we-do/publications/amidst-the-debris.
18 PAX, Living under a Black Sky: Conflict Pollution and Environmental Health Concerns in Iraq, 5 December 2017, available at: https://paxforpeace.nl/what-we-do/publications/living-under-a-black-sky.
19 Wim Zwijnenburg, “Donbas: A Ticking Toxic Time Bomb”, Bellingcat, 30 March 2017, available at: www.bellingcat.com/news/uk-and-europe/2017/03/30/donbas-ticking-toxic-time-bomb/.
20 UN Habitat, “Mosul Environmental Hazards Assessment”, 15 May 2017, available at: http://unhabitatiraq.net/mosulportal/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/170515_Environmental-Hazards.pdf.
21 Richard Pendry, “New Technology, War, and Human Rights Reporting”, in Stephen J. A. Ward (ed.), Handbook of Global Media Ethics, Springer, Cham, 2019, available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-32103-5_51.
22 Rahul Katarya and Mahboob Massoudi, Recognizing Fake News in Social Media with Deep Learning: A Systematic Review, Fourth International Conference on Computer, Communication and Signal Processing, Chennai, India, 2020, available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9315255.
23 Wim Zwijnenburg, “Environmental Monitoring of Conflicts Using Sentinel-2 Data”, Sentinel Hub Blog, 29 January 2019, available at: https://medium.com/sentinel-hub/environmental-monitoring-of-conflicts-using-sentinel-2-61f07d76e27b.
24 Vincent Salomonson, William Barnes and Edward Masuoka, “Introduction to MODIS and an Overview of Associated Activities”, in John Qu, Wei Gao, Menas Kafatos, Robert Murphy and Vincent Salomonson (eds), Earth Science Satellite Remote Sensing, Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, 2006, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37293-6_2.
25 Li, Xi, Chen, Fengrui and Chen, Xiaoling, “Satellite-Observed Nighttime Light Variation as Evidence for Global Armed Conflicts”, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, Vol. 6, No. 5, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6502753/.
26 Ollie Ballinger and Wim Zwijnenburg, “What Oil Satellite Technology and Iraq can Tell Us about Pollution”, Bellingcat, 14 April 2021, available at: www.bellingcat.com/resources/2021/04/15/what-oil-satellite-technology-and-iraq-can-tell-us-about-pollution.
27 Björnham, Oscar et al., “The 2016 Al-Mishraq Sulphur Plant Fire: Source and Health Risk Area Estimation”, Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 169, 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.025.
28 Jafarzadeh, Hamid et al., “Oil Spill Detection from Synthetic Aperture Radar Earth Observations: A Meta-Analysis and Comprehensive Review”, GIScience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 58, No. 7, 2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15481603.2021.1952542.
29 Vankayalapati, Kotsewararao et al., “Multi-Mission Satellite Detection and Tracking of October 2019 Sabiti Oil Spill in the Red Sea”, Remote Sensing, Vol. 15, No. 38, 2023Google Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010038.
30 Kumar, Amit, et al., “Analyzing Urban Damage and Surface Deformation Based Hazard-Risk in Kathmandu City Occurred During Nepal Earthquake (2015) Using SAR Interferometry”, Advances in Space Research, Vol. 70, No. 12, 2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.02.003.
31 Mendez, Fernando Arturo and Valánszki, István, “Environmental Armed Conflict Assessment Using Satellite Imagery”, Journal of Environmental Geography, Vol. 13, No. 3–4, 2021Google Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/jengeo-2020-0007.
32 Mohamed, Mohammed Ali, “An Assessment of Forest Cover Change and Its Driving Forces in the Syrian Coastal Region during a Period of Conflict, 2010 to 2020”, Land, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020191.
33 Bautista-Cespedes, Oscar et al., “The Effects of Armed Conflict on Forest Cover Changes across Temporal and Spatial Scales in the Colombian Amazon”, Regional Environmental Change, Vol. 21, 2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01770-6.
34 Ordway, Elsa M., “Political Shifts and Changing Forests: Effects of Armed Conflict on Forest Conservation in Rwanda”, Global Ecology and Conservation, Vol. 3, 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2015.01.013.
35 Hazaymeh, Khaled et al., “A Remote Sensing-Based Analysis of the Impact of Syrian Crisis on Agricultural Land Abandonment in Yarmouk River Basin”, Sensors, Vol. 22, No. 10, 2022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103931.
36 Jaafar, Hadi H. and Woertz, Eckart, “Agriculture as a Funding Source of ISIS: A GIS and Remote Sensing Analysis”, Food Policy, Vol. 64, 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.002.
37 Mackenhauer, Victor et al., “The Impact of Conflict-Driven Cropland Abandonment on Food Insecurity in South Sudan Revealed Using Satellite Remote Sensing”, Nature Food, Vol. 2 No. 12, 2021Google Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00417-3.
38 Mereuţă, Alexandru et al., “A Novel Method of Identifying and Analysing Oil Smoke Plumes Based on MODIS and CALIPSO Satellite Data”, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 22, No. 7, 2022Google Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5071-2022.
39 Levin, Noam, Ali, Saleem, Crandall, David and Kark, Salit, “World Heritage in Danger: Big Data and Remote Sensing can Help Protect Sites in Conflict Zones”, Global Environmental Change, Vol. 55, 2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.02.001.
40 Megan Zaroda, “NASA Harvest Tracks Frontline Agriculture Patterns with Planet's Satellite Data”, Planet, 5 September 2022, available at: www.planet.com/pulse/nasa-harvest-tracks-frontline-agriculture-patterns-with-planets-satellite-data/.
41 Kaveh Khoshnood et al., Ukraine's Crop Storage Infrastructure: Post-Invasion Damage Assessment, Humanitarian Research Lab at Yale School of Public Health and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 15 September 2022, available at: https://hub.conflictobservatory.org/portal/sharing/rest/content/items/67cc4b8ff2124d3bbd5b8ec2bdaece4f/data.
42 PAX, Risks and Impacts from Attacks on Energy Infrastructure. Environment and Conflict Alert Ukraine, 2022, available at: https://paxforpeace.nl/what-we-do/publications/risks-and-impacts-from-attacks-on-energy-infrastructure-in-ukraine.
43 Shumilova, Oleksandra et al., “Impact of the Russia–Ukraine Armed Conflict on Water Resources and Water Infrastructure”, Nature Sustainability, Vol. 6, No. 5, 2023CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01068-x.
44 World Wildlife Foundation, “High Conservation Values Matter in Wartime in Ukraine”, 29 December 2022, available at: www.wwfmmi.org/?8541441/high-conservation-values.
45 ZoI Environment Network, “Ecodozor Platform for Monitoring War-Related Environmental Damage and Risks in Ukraine”, 2023, available at: https://zoinet.org/product/ecodozor/.
46 International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Explosive Weapons With Wide Area Effects: A Deadly Choice in Populated Areas, Geneva, January 2022, available at: www.icrc.org/en/document/civilians-protected-against-explosive-weapons.
47 See the article by Simon Bagshaw in this issue of the Review.
48 PAX, “Exploring Environmental Harm from Explosive Weapons in Populated Areas”, May 2020, available at: https://paxforpeace.nl/news/blogs/exploring-environmental-harm-from-explosive-weapons-in-populated-areas.
49 UNEP, “Environmental Issues in Areas Retaken from ISIL Mosul, Iraq – Technical Note”, Geneva, 2017, available at: www.unep.org/resources/publication/environmental-issues-areas-retaken-isil-mosul-iraq-technical-note.
50 PAX, “Gaza: Preliminary Urban and Environmental Impacts”, Environment and Conflict Alert No. 3, May 2021, available at: https://paxforpeace.nl/what-we-do/publications/environment-and-conflict-alert-gaza.
51 Aimaiti, Yusupujiang et al., “War Related Building Damage Assessment in Kyiv, Ukraine, Using Sentinel-1 Radar and Sentinel-2 Optical Images”, Remote Sensing, Vol. 14, No. 24, 2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14246239.
52 UN General Assembly, Protection of the Environment in Relation to Armed Conflicts, UN Doc. A/CN.5/L.968, 20 May 2022, available at: https://legal.un.org/docs/?symbol=A/CN.4/L.968.
53 PAX, “Iraqis Fear Conflict Pollution Will Not Be Cleaned Up”, 5 December 2017, available at:: https://paxforpeace.nl/news/overview/iraqis-fear-conflict-pollution-will-not-be-cleaned-up.
54 UNEA Res. 3/1, “Pollution Mitigation and Control in Areas affected by Armed Conflict or Terrorism”, 30 January 2018, available at: https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/30792.
55 Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Implications for Human Rights of the Environmentally Sound Management and Disposal of Hazardous Substances and Wastes, UN Doc. A/HR/33/41, 2 August 2016, available at: www.ohchr.org/en/calls-for-input/report-rights-child-and-hazardous-substances-and-wastes.
56 Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Implications for Human Rights of the Environmentally Sound Management and Disposal of Hazardous Substances and Wastes, UN Doc. A/HRC/36/41, 20 July 2017, available at: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G17/218/43/PDF/G1721843.pdf?OpenElement.
57 PAX, “Protecting the Environment Is Protecting Civilians: The Humanitarian Dimensions of the Environment, Peace and Security Agenda”, UN Security Council Side-Event Summary, 2021, available at: https://protectionofcivilians.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Event-Summary-PERAC-is-PoC-Humanitarian-Dimensions-of-EPS-1.pdf.
58 UN Security Council, Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict: Report of the Secretary-General, UN Doc. A/2022/281, 10 May 2022, available at: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/report-secretary-general-protection-civilians-armed-conflict-s2022381-enarruzhfr.
59 UN Security Council, Arria-Formula Meeting on the Protection of the Environment during Armed Conflict, 8 December 2019, available at: www.securitycouncilreport.org/whatsinblue/2019/12/arria-formula-meeting-on-the-protection-of-the-environment-during-armed-conflict.php.
60 UN Convention to Combat Desertification, “Briefing UN Security Council on Humanitarian Effects of Environmental Degradation on Peace and Security”, 17 September 2020, available at: www.unccd.int/news-stories/statements/briefing-un-security-council-humanitarian-effects-environmental-degradation.
61 Kaplan, Gordana et al., “Monitoring War-Generated Environmental Security using Remote Sensing: A Review”, Land Degradation and Development, Vol. 33 No. 10, 2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4249.
62 Leiserson, Charles et al., “There's Plenty of Room at the Top: What will Drive Computer Performance after Moore's Law?”, Science, Vol. 368, No. 6495, 2020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, available at: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aam9744.
63 Merritt, Patrick et al., “Big Earth Data: A Comprehensive Analysis of Visualization Analytics Issues”, Big Earth Data, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2019Google Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2019.1576260.
64 Global Witness, “Myanmar's Poisoned Mountains. The Toxic Rare Earth Mining Industry at the Heart of the Global Green Energy Transition”, 2022, available at: www.globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/natural-resource-governance/myanmars-poisoned-mountains/.
65 Quinn, John et al., “Humanitarian Applications of Machine Learning with Remote-Sensing Data: Review and Case Study in Refugee Settlement Mapping”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 376, No. 2128, 2018Google ScholarPubMed, available at: http://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0363.
66 Chen, Ying-Nong et al., “Special Issue Review: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications in Remote Sensing”, Remote Sensing, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2023Google Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/Rs15030569.
67 Xu, Yonghao et al., “AI Security for Geoscience and Remote Sensing: Challenges and Future Trends”, IEEE GeoScience and Remote Sensing Magazine, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2023CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.09360.pdf.
68 Seungwan Cho, Jungmok Ma and Oleg A. Yakimenko, “Aerial Multi-Spectral AI-based Detection System for Unexploded Ordnance”, Defence Technology, 2022, available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2022.12.002.
69 PAX, Scorched Earth and Charred Lives. Human Health and Environmental Risks of Civilian-Operated Makeshift Oil Refineries in Syria, 5 September 2016, available at: https://paxforpeace.nl/what-we-do/publications/scorched-earth-and-charred-lives.
70 Available at: https://ollielballinger.users.earthengine.app/view/rojavaoil.
71 Olivia Nielsen and Dave Hodgkin, “Rebuilding Ukraine: The Imminent Risks from Asbestos”, UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 7 June 2022, available at: www.preventionweb.net/blog/rebuilding-ukraine-imminent-risks-asbestos.
72 “Data from Satellites Reveal the Vast Extent of Fighting in Ukraine”, The Economist, 23 February 2023, available at: www.economist.com/interactive/briefing/2023/02/23/data-from-satellites-reveal-the-vast-extent-of-fighting-in-ukraine.
73 Mueller, Hannes, Groeger, Andre and Hersh, Jonathan, “Monitoring War Destruction from Space Using Machine Learning”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 18, No. 23, 2021Google Scholar, available at: www.pnas.org/doi/epdf/10.1073/pnas.2025400118.
74 Witmer, Frank, “Remote Sensing of Violent Conflict: Eyes from Above”, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 36, No. 9, 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2015.1035412.
75 ESA, “GHGSat Instruments”, 2023, available at: https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/missions/ghgsat#instruments-section.
76 K. Khoshnood et al., above note 41.
77 Meg Kelly and Katharine Houreld, “Satellite Imagery Shows Evidence of New Graves after Tigray Massacres”, Washington Post, 7 July 2023, available at: www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/07/07/ethiopia-massacre-graves/.
78 Buolamwini, Joy and Gebru, Timni, “Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Glassification”, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 81, 2018Google Scholar, available at: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html.
79 Weir, Doug, McQuillan, Dan and Francis, Robert A., “Civilian Science: The Potential of Participatory Environmental Monitoring in Areas Affected by Armed Conflicts”, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 191, 2019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7773-9.
80 ICRC, Guidelines on the Protection of the Natural Environment in Armed Conflict, Geneva, 2020, available at: www.icrc.org/en/publication/4382-guidelines-protection-natural-environment-armed-conflict.
81 Kate Mackintosh and Lisa Oldring, “Watch This Space: Momentum Toward an International Crime of Ecocide”, Just Security, 5 December 2022, available at: www.justsecurity.org/84367/watch-this-space-momentum-toward-an-international-crime-of-ecocide/.
82 Neither Russia nor Ukraine has ratified the Rome Statute. Ukraine has, however, made a declaration accepting the ICC's jurisdiction over its territory for a fixed time period.
83 UNSC Res. 687, 3 April 1991, available at: https://uncc.ch/sites/default/files/attachments/documents/res0687.pdf.
84 PAX, “A Preliminary Environmental Risk Assessment of the Kakhova Dam Flooding”, 13 July 2023, available at: https://paxforpeace.nl/news/a-preliminary-environmental-risk-assessment-of-the-kakhovka-dam-flooding/.
85 UN Development Programme, “New Coordination Center to Assess Environmental Impacts of the War on Ukraine”, 10 March 2023, available at: www.undp.org/ukraine/press-releases/new-coordination-center-assess-environmental-impacts-war-ukraine.
