Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-hd9dq Total loading time: 0.47 Render date: 2022-10-05T09:35:25.676Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Gender, structure, and war: what Waltz couldn't see

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2012

Laura Sjoberg*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Political Science, University of Florida, Department of Political Science, 203 Anderson Hall, PO Box 117325, Gainesville, 32611–7325 Florida, USA
*

Abstract

This article theorizes Waltz's ‘third image,’ international system structure, through feminist lenses. After briefly reviewing International Relations (IR) analysis of the relationship between anarchy, structure, and war, it introduces gender analysis in IR with a focus on its theorizing of war(s). From this work, it sketches an approach to theorizing international structure through gendered lenses and provides an initial plausibility case for the argument that the international system structure is gender-hierarchical, focusing on its influence on unit (state) function, the distribution of capabilities among units, and the political processes which consistently govern unit interaction. It outlines the implications of an account of the international system as gender-hierarchical for theorizing the causes of war generally and wars specifically, with a focus on potentially testable hypotheses. The article concludes with some ideas about the potential significance of a theorizing gender from a structural perspective and of theorizing structure from through gendered lenses.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acker, Joan. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender and Society 4(2):139158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agathangelou, Anna M. 2002. “ ‘Sexing’ Globalization in International Relations: Migrant Sex and Domestic Workers in Cyprus, Greece, and Turkey.” In Power, Postcolonialism, and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender, and Class, edited by Geeta Chowdhry and Sheila Nair, 142169. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alexander, Ronni. 2010. “Confronting Militarization: Intersections of Gender(ed) Violence, Militarization, and Resistance in the Pacific.” In Gender, War, and Militarism: Feminist Perspectives, edited by Laura Sjoberg and Sandra Via, 6979. New York: Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
Allen, Amy. 2000. The Power of Feminist Theory: Domination, Resistance, and Empowerment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, RobertKeohane, Robert O.. 1985. “Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” World Politics 38(1):226254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, Sikata. 2005. Make Me a Man! Masculinity, Hinduism, and Nationalism in India. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Sikata. 2010. The Borderlands of Gender, Nation, and Empire: Armed Femininity and Muscular Nationalism in India and Ireland (Manuscript under contract at New York University Press).Google Scholar
Bannerji, Himani. 2000. The Dark Side of the Nation: Essays on Multiculturalism, Nationalism, and Gender. Ottawa: Canadian Scholars’ Press.Google Scholar
Bell, ChristineO'Rourke, Catherine. 2007. “Does Feminism Need a Theory of Transitional Justice?International Journal of Transitional Justice 1(1):2344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, Dana M. 2000. “The Epistemology of the Gendered Organization.” Gender and Society 14(3):418434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Sarah. 1988. “Feminism, International Theory, and International Relations of Gender Inequality.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 17(3):461475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brysk, Allison. 2000. Tribal Village to Global Village: Indian Human Rights and International Relations in Latin America. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, JudithScott, Joan, eds. 1992. Feminists Theorize the Political. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caprioli, Mary. 2000. “Gendered Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 37(1):5168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caprioli, Mary. 2004. “Feminist IR Theory and Quantitative Methodology: A Critical Analysis.” International Studies Review 6(2):253269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, Lars ErikRao, Mohan Penubarti. 2001. “Exploring the Dynamic of the Democratic Peace.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 45(6):818833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, Hilary, Chinkin, ChristineWright, Shelley. 1991. “Feminist Approaches to International Law.” American Journal of International Law 85(2):613650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, Christine. 1998. In Service and Servitude: Foreign Female Domestic Workers and the Malaysian “Modernity” Project. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Clausewitz, Carl von. 1830. On War, edited by Michael E. Howard and Peter Paret. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, Carol. 1988. “Sex and Death in the World of Rational Defense Intellectuals.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 12(4):697718.Google Scholar
Connell, R. W. 1995. Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Conway, D. 2008. “Masculinities and Narrating the Past: Experiences of Researching White Who Refused to Serve in Apartheid Army.” Qualitative Research 8(3):347354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, Runa. 2003. “Postcolonial (In)securities, the BJP and the Politics of Hindutva: Broadening the Security Paradigm Between Realist and Anti-nuclear/Peace Groups in India.” Third World Quarterly 24:7796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Costa, BinaLee-Koo, Katrina. 2008. Gender and Politics in the Asia-Pacific. Sydney: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Den Boer, AndreaHudson, Valerie. 2002. “A Surplus of Men, A Deficit of Peace: Security and Sex Ratios in Asia's Largest States.” International Security 26(4):523.Google Scholar
Desforges, Alison. 1999. Leave None to Tell the Story: Genocide in Rwanda. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael. 1983. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12(4):323353.Google Scholar
Eichler, Maya. 2010. “Russian Veterans of the Chechen Wars: A Feminist Analysis of Militarized Masculinities.” In Feminist International Relations: Conversations about the Past, Present, and Future, edited by J. Ann Tickner and Laura Sjoberg. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elias, JuanitaBeasley, Chrisine. 2009. “Hegemonic Masculinity and Globalization: ‘Traditional Business Masculinities’ and Beyond.” Globalizations 6(2):281296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1985. “Reflections on War and Political Discourse: Realism, Just War, and Feminism in a Nuclear Age.” Political Theory 13(1):3957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. ed. 1992. Just War Theory. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
English, Robert. 2000. Russia and the Idea of the West: Gorbachev, Intellectuals, and the End of the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1983. Does Khaki Become You? The Militarisation of Women's Lives. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1989. Bananas, Beaches, and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1993. The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2000. Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women's Lives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2004. The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in a New Age of Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2010. Nimo's War, Emma's War: Making Feminist Sense of the Iraq War. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, Theo. 2005. The Norms of War: Cultural Beliefs and Modern Conflict. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2005. “The Bare Bones of Sex: Part 1 – Sex and Gender.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30(2):14911526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D.Laitin, David D.. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review 97(1):7590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, Elizabeth. 1998. “Feminist Political Theory.” In Contemporary Feminist Theories, edited by Jackie Jones and Stevi Jackson. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Gailey, Christine Ward. 1987. “Evolutionary Perspectives on Gender Hierarchy.” In Analyzing Gender, edited by B. Hess and M. Ferree. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Garry, AnnePearsall., Marianne 1996. Women, Knowledge, and Reality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gat, Azar. 2009. “So Why Do People Fight? Evolutionary Theory and the Causes of War.” European Journal of International Relations 15(4):571599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E.Nexon., Daniel H. 2005. “Paradigm Lost? Structural Realism and Structural Functionalism.” European Journal of International Relations 10(1):961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua. 2001. War and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gortzak, Yoav, Haftel, YoramSweeney, Kevin. 2005. “Offense-Defense Theory: An Empirical Assessment.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(1):6789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. 1988. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism.” International Organization 42(4):485507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Fred. 1988. “Hidden from International Relations: Women and the International Arena.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 17(3):419428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1998. Is Science Multicultural?. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Haynes, John. 2003. New Soviet Man: Gender and Masculinity in Stalinist Soviet Cinema. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Heeg Maruska, Jennifer. 2010. “When are States Hypermasculine?.” In Gender and International Security: Feminist Perspectives, edited by Laura Sjoberg. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Henderson, Errol A. 1997. “Culture or Contiguity: Ethnic Conflict, the Similarity of States, and the Onset of War, 1820–1989.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(5):649668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill Collins, Patricia. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics and Empowerment, 2nd ed., New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy. 1989. “Freedom, Recognition, and Obligation: A Feminist Approach to Political Theory.” American Political Science Review 83:12271244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, MartinSmith., Steve 1991. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. London: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hooper, Charlotte. 1998. “Masculinist Practices and Gender Politics: The Operation of Multiple Masculinities in IR.” In The “Man” Question in International Politics, edited by Marysia Zalewski and Jane Parpart. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hooper, Charlotte. 2000. “Masculinities in Transition: The Case of Globalization.” In Gender and Global Restructuring, edited by Marianne Marchand and Anne Sisson Runyan. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hooper, Charlotte. 2001. Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations, and Gender Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopf, Ted. 1998. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory.” International Security 23(1):171200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Valerie, Mary, Caprioli, Bonnie, Ballif-Spanvill, Rose, McDermottChad, Emmett F. 2009. “The Heart of the Matter: The Security of Women and the Security of States.” International Security 33(3):745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Inglehart, RonaldNorris, Pippa. 2002. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jowkar, Forouz. 1986. “Honor and Shame: A Feminist View from Within.” Gender Issues 6:4565.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1998. “Beyond Dichotomy: Conversations Between International Relations and Feminist Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 42:193198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, RobertLisa, Martin. 1995. “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory.” International Security 20:3951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennie, June. 1999. “Deconstructing Gendered Power Relations in Participatory Planning: Towards an Empowering Feminist Framework of Participation and Action.” Women's Studies International Forum 22(1):97112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack. 1983. War in the Modern Great Power System, 1495–1975. Louisville: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Little, Richard. 2007. The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths, and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, JoniBaudino, Claudie, eds. 2005. State Feminism and Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine. 1993. Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 1986. The Sources of Social Power: A History of Power from the Beginning to A. D. 1760, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine. 1989. Towards a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mazur, Amy. 2001. State Feminism, Women's Movements, and Job Training: Making Democracies Work in the Global Economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mazur, AmyStetson, Deborah, eds. 1995. Comparative State Feminism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
McClintock, Anne. 1993. “Family Feuds: Gender, Nationalism, and the Family.” Feminist Review 44(2):6190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, Kelly M. 2010. All About the Wordplay: Gendered and Orientalist Language in U.S.–Egyptian Foreign Relations, 1952–1961. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Kent State University, August.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Meintjes, Sheila. 1998. “Gender, Nationalism, and Transformation: Difference and Commonality in South Africa's Past and Present.” In Women, Ethnicity, and Nationalism: The Politics of Transition, edited by Rick Wilford and Robert Miller, 6286. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meyer, Mary K.Prugl, Elisabeth, eds. 1999. Gender Politics in Global Governance. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2006. “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma.” European Journal of International Relations 12(2):341370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra. 2003. Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, Katherine. 1997. Sex Among Allies. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Moscovici, Claudia. 2000. Gender and Citizenship. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Moser, CarolineMoser, Annalise. 2005. “Gender Mainstreaming since Beijing: A Review of Success and Limitations in International Institutions.” Gender and Development 13(2):1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayak, Meghana. 2006. “Orientalism and ‘Saving’ US State Identity after 9/11.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 8(1):4261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niarchos, Catherine N. 1995. “Women, War, and Rape: Challenges Facing the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.” Human Rights Quarterly 17(4):649690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niva, Steve. 1998. “Tough and Tender: New World Order Masculinity and the Gulf War.” In The “Man” Question in International, edited by Marysia Zalewski and Jane Parpart. Relations Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Oneal, John R.Russett, Bruce. 1997. “The Classical Liberals Were Right.” International Studies Quarterly 41(2):267293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oneal, John R., Oneal, Francis H., Maoz, ZeevRussett, Bruce. 1996. “The Liberal Peace: Interdependence, Democracy, and International Conflict, 1950–1985.” Journal of Peace Research 33(1):1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Organski, A.F.K. 1958. World Politics. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Peterson, Spike V. 1992. “Transgressing Boundaries: Theories of Knowledge, Gender, and International Relations.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 21(2):183206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Spike V. 1999. “Sexing Political identities/Nationalism as Heterosexism.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 1(2):3465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Spike V. 2003. A Critical Rewriting of Global Political Economy: Integrating Reproductive, Productive, and Virtual Economies. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Spike V. 2010. “Gendered Identities, Ideologies, and Practices in the Context of War and Militarism.” In Gender, War, and Militarism: Feminist Perspectives, edited by Laura Sjoberg and Sandra Via. New York: Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
Peterson, Spike V.True, Jacqui. 1998. “ ‘New Times’ and New Conversations.” In The “Man” Question in International Relations, edited by B. Jane Parpart and Marysia Zalewski. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Spike V.Runyan, Anne Sisson. 1999. Global Gender Issues, 2d ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Spike V.Runyan, Anne Sisson 2010. Global Gender Issues in the New Millennium. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Pettman, Jan Jindy. 1996. Worlding Women. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Porter, Elisabeth. 1998. “Identity, Location, Plurality: Women, Nationalism, and Northern Ireland.” In Women, Ethnicity, and Nationalism: The Politics of Transition, edited by Rick Wilford and Robert Miller, 3661. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reardon, Betty. 1985. Sexism and the War System. New York: Teachers’ College Press at Columbia University.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2008. “Reading History through Constructivist Eyes.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 37(2):395414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Fiona. 2011. The Ethics of Care: A Feminist Approach to Human Security. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Savery, Lynn. 2007. “On the Ontology of Norm Diffusion.” In Contributions to Social Ontology, edited by Clive Lawson, John Latsis, and Nuno Martins. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1993. Engenderings: Constructions of Knowledge, Authority, and Privilege. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schulze, Kirsten. 1998. “Communal Violence, Civil War, and Foreign Occupation: Women in Lebanon.” In Women, Ethnicity, and Nationalism: The Politics of Transition, edited by Rick Wilford and Robert Miller, 150169. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan. 1986. “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis.” The American Historical Review 91(5):10531075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Joan. 1987. “History and Difference.” Daedalus 116(4):93118.Google Scholar
Sen, Samita. 1993. “Motherhood and Mothercraft: Gender and Nationalism in Bengal.” Gender & History 5(2):231243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, Laura. 2008. Gender, Violence, and Security: Discourse as Practice. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Singer, David J. 1961. “The Levels-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations.” World Politics 14(1):7792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2006a. Gender, Justice, and the Wars in Iraq. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2006b. “The Gendered Realities of the Immunity Principle: Why Gender Analysis Needs Feminism.” International Studies Quarterly 50(4):889910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2008. “The Norm of Tradition: Gender Subordination and Women's Exclusion from International Relations.” Politics and Gender 4(1):7380.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2009a. “Introduction to Security Studies: Feminist Contributions.” Security Studies 18(2):183213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. ed. 2009b. Security Studies: Feminist Contributions, edited special issue of the journal Security Studies, vol. 18, issue 2, April 2009.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2010. “Gendering Power Transition Theory.” In Gender and International Security: Feminist Perspectives, edited by Laura Sjoberg. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sjoberg Laura and Caron Gentry 2007. Mothers, Monsters, Whole Women's Violence in Global Politics. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1985. “Coordination versus Prisoners’ Dilemma: Implications for International Cooperation and Regimes.” American Political Science Review 79(4):932942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, Judith. 2000. Gender in Political Theory. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Steans, Jill. 1998. Gender and International Relations: An Introduction. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Steans, Jill. 2003. “Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the Mainstream of International Relations.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5(3):428454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Brent. 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stiehm, Judith. ed. 1983. Women and Men's Wars. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Suganami, Hidemi. 1996. On the Causes of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunindyo, Saraswati. 1998. “When the Earth is Female and the Nation is Mother: Gender, Armed Forces, and Nationalism in Indonesia.” Feminist Review 58:121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swider, Sarah. 2006. “Working Women of the World Unite? Labor Organizing and Transnational Gender Solidarity Among Domestic Workers in Hong Kong.” In Global Feminism: Transnational Women's Activism, Organizing, and Human Rights, edited by Myra Marx Ferree and Aili Tripp. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 1994. Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 2010. “Tensions in Feminist Security Studies.” Security Dialogue 41(6):607614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tachjian, Vahe. 2009. “Gender, Nationalism, Exclusion: The Reintegration Process of Female Survivors of the Armenian Genocide.” Nations and Nationalism 15(1):6080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tammen, Ronald L., et al. 2000. Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century. New York: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Taylor, Diana. 1997. Disappearing Acts: Spectacles of Gender and Nationalism in Argentina's ‘Dirty War’. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Tessler, MarkWarriner, Ina. 1997. “Gender, Feminism, and Attitudes Toward International Conflict: Exploring Relationships with Survey Data from the Middle East.” World Politics 49(2):250281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tickner, Ann J. 1988. “Hans Morgenthau's Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 17(3):429440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tickner, Ann J. 1992. Gender in International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tickner, Ann J. 2001. Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in a Post-Cold War Era. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
True, Jacqui. 1996. “Feminism.” In Theories of International Relations, edited by Scott Burchill and Andrew Linklater. London: MacMillian.Google Scholar
True, JacquiMintrom, Michael. 2001. Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming.” International Studies Quarterly 45(1):2757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Evera, Steven. 1998. “Offense, Defense, and the Causes of War.” International Security 22(4):543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, John. 1993. The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walt, Stephen. 1988. “Testing Theories of Alliance Formation: The Case of Southwest Asia.” International Organization 42(2):275316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1959. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1986. “Laws and Theories, Reductionist and Systemic Theories, Political Structures, and Anarchic Orders and Balances of Power.” In Neorealism and its Critics, edited by Robert O. Keohane. 27130. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 2000. “Structural Realism after the Cold War.” International Security 25(1):541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 1994. “Women and Democratization: Conceptualizing Gender Relatins in Transition Politics.” World Politics 46(3):327354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Cynthia. 1999. Faking It: US Hegemony in a “Post-Phallic” Era. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2):391425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1994. “Collective Identity formation and the International State.” American Political Science Review 88(3):384396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1995. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security 19(1):7181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wibben, Annick. 2011. Feminist Security Studies: A Narrative Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Lauren. 2009. “Gendering the Cult of the Offensive.” Security Studies 18(2):214240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2003. “The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 29(1):127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuval-Davis, N. 1997. Gender and Nation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Zalewski, Marysia. 1995. “Well, What is the Feminist Perspective on Bosnia.” International Affairs 71(2):339356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Gender, structure, and war: what Waltz couldn't see
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Gender, structure, and war: what Waltz couldn't see
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Gender, structure, and war: what Waltz couldn't see
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *