Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-hlvcg Total loading time: 0.277 Render date: 2022-07-05T22:41:16.522Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Selectorate theory, the democratic peace, and public goods provision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2014

Philip Arena*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Rochester, New York, USA
Nicholas P. Nicoletti
Affiliation:
Department of Social Sciences, Missouri Southern State University, Missouri, USA

Abstract

We show that without a few peculiar modeling choices that are not justified by the core assumptions of the theory, selectorate theory neither unambiguously predicts the democratic peace nor that leaders of more inclusive regimes will rely upon the provision of public goods to remain in office, though they may be more likely to provide club goods. We illustrate these claims using relatively simple models that incorporate the core assumptions of their theory, while avoiding modeling choices we believe to be less appropriate. We argue for a revised version of selectorate theory, one that continues to emphasize the importance of the size of the winning coalition, yet we believe it provides a more realistic picture of democratic politics.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Sally, and Souva, Mark. 2010. “The Accountability Effects of Political Institutions and Capitalism on Interstate Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 54(4):543565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babst, Dean. 1964. “Elective Governments – A Force for Peace.” The Wisconsin Sociologist 3(1):914.Google Scholar
Bennett, D. Scott. 2006. “Towards a Continuous Specification of the Democracy-Autocracy Connection.” International Studies Quarterly 50(2):313338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, Stuart. 1992. “Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816–1965.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36(2):309341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph, and Morrow, James. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Smith, Alastair. 2007. “Foreign Aid and Policy Concessions.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 51(2):251284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Smith, Alastair 2009. “A Political Economy of Aid.” International Organization 63(2):309340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Morrow, James D., Siverson, Randolph M., and Smith, Alastair. 1999. “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 93(4):791807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiozza, Giacomo, and Goemans, Hein. 2004. “International Conflict and the Tenure of Leaders: Is War Still Ex Post Inefficient?American Journal of Political Science 48(3):604619.Google Scholar
Clarke, Kevin, and Primo, David. 2012. Model Politics: Political Science and the Logic of Representations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Kevin, and Stone, Randall. 2008. “Democracy and the Logic of Political Survival.” American Political Science Review 102(3):387391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danilovic, Vesna, and Clare, Joe. 2007. “The Kantian Liberal Peace (Revisited).” American Journal of Political Science 51(2):397414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debs, Alexandre, and Goemans, H.E.. 2010. “Regime Type, the Fate of Leaders, and War.” American Political Science Review 104(3):430445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorussen, Han, and Ward, Hugh. 2008. “Intergovernmental Organizations and the Kantian Peace: A Network Perspective.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 52(2):189212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorussen, Han, and Ward, Hugh 2010. “Trade Networks and the Kantian Peace.” Journal of Peace Research 47(1):2942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James. 1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review 88(3):577592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49(3):379414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fey, Mark, Meirowitz, Adam, and Ramsay, Kristopher. 2013. “Credibility of Peaceful Agreements in Crisis Bargaining.” Political Science Research and Methods 1(1):2752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fey, Mark, and Ramsay, Kristopher. 2011. “Uncertainty and Incentives in Crisis Bargaining: Game-Free Analysis of International Conflict.” American Journal of Political Science 55(1):149169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartzke, Eric. 2007. “The Capitalist Peace.” American Journal of Political Science 51(1):166191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartzke, Erik, Li, Quan, and Boehmer, Charles. 2001. “Investing in the Peace: Economic Interdependence and International Conflict.” International Organization 55(2):391438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibler, Douglas. 2007. “Bordering on Peace: Democracy, Territorial Issues, and Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly 51(3):131147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibler, Douglas 2012. The Territorial Peace. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goemans, Hein. 2000. War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Errol. 2002. Democracy and War: The End of an Illusion?. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.Google Scholar
Henderson, Errol 2009. “Disturbing the Peace: African Warfare, Political Inversion and the Universality of the Democratic Peace Thesis.” British Journal of Political Science 39(1):2558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, Paul, and Allee, Todd. 2002. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Matthew, and Morelli, Massimo. 2007. “Political Bias and War.” American Economic Review 97(4):13531373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1983. Perpetual Peace and Other Essays on Politics, History, and Moral Practice. Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, and Russett, Bruce. 1993. “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986.” American Political Science Review 87(3):624638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, and Meirowitz, Adam. 2007. Political Game Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGillivray, Fiona, and Smith, Alastair. 2006. “Credibility in Compliance and Punishment: Leader Specific Punishments and Credibility.” Journal of Politics 68(2):248258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGillivray, Fiona, and Smith, Alastair. 2008. Punishing the Prince: A Theory of International Relations, Political Institutions and Leader Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Morrow, James, Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Siverson, Randolph, and Smith, Alastair. 2006. “Selection Institutions and War Aims.” Economics of Governance 7(1):3152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, James, Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Siverson, Randolph, and Smith, Alastair. 2008. “Retesting Selectorate Theory: Separating the Effects of W from Other Elements of Democracy.” American Political Science Review 102(3):393400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Dennis. 2003. Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthoo, Abhinay. 1999. Bargaining Theory with Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oneal, John, and Russett, Bruce. 1997. “The Classic Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence and Conflict, 1950–1985.” International Studies Quarterly 41(2):267294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oneal, John, Russett, Bruce, and Berbaum, Michael. 2003. “Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992.” International Studies Quarterly 47(3):371393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patty, John, and Weber, Roberto. 2006. “Agreeing to Fight: An Explanation of the Democratic Peace.” Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5(3):305320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, James Lee. 1995. Democracies in International Conflict. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Ray, James Lee 2003. “A Lakatosian View of the Democratic Research Program.” In Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, edited by Colin Elman, and Miriam Fendius Elman, 209212. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reiter, Dan, and Stam, Allan C. 2002. Democracies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William, and Ordeshook, Peter. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62(1):2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosato, Sebastian. 2003. “The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory.” American Political Science Review 97(4):585602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Michael. 2006. “Is Democracy Good for the Poor?American Journal of Political Science 50(4):860874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce, and Oneal, John R.. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth. 2001. Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slantchev, Branislav. 2005. “Military Coercion in Interstate Crises.” American Political Science Review 99(4):533547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slantchev, Branislav 2006. “Politicians, the Media, and Domestic Audience Costs.” International Studies Quarterly 50(2):445477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Weeks, Jessica. 2008. “Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve.” International Organization 62(1):3564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Selectorate theory, the democratic peace, and public goods provision
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Selectorate theory, the democratic peace, and public goods provision
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Selectorate theory, the democratic peace, and public goods provision
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *