Skip to main content Accessibility help

Choosing anarchy: institutional alternatives and the global order

  • Moonhawk Kim (a1) and Scott Wolford (a2)


The international system may be anarchic, but anarchy is neither fixed nor inevitable. We analyze collective choices between anarchy, a system of inefficient self-enforcement, and external enforcement, where punishment is delegated to a third party at some upfront cost. In equilibrium, external enforcement (establishing governments) prevails when interaction density is high, the costs of integration are low, and violations are difficult to predict, but anarchy (drawing borders) prevails when at least one of these conditions fail. We explore the implications of this theory for the causal role of anarchy in international relations theory, the integration and disintegration of political units, and the limits and possibilities of cooperation through international institutions.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance.” International Organization 54(3): 421456.
Alesina, Alberto, and Spolaore, Enrico. 2003. The Size of Nations. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Alter, Karen J. 1998. “Who are the ‘Masters of the Treaty’? European Governments and the European Court of Justice.” International Organization 52(1): 121147.
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Axelrod, Robert, and Keohane, Robert O.. 1985. “Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” World Politics 38(1): 226254.
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Burley, Anne-Marie, and Mattli, Walter. 1993. “Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration.” International Organization 47(1): 4176.
Burnett, Edmund C. ed. 1923. Letters of the Members of the Continental Congress, 8 vols. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1964. The Twenty Years’ Crisis: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations 2nd ed.New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Carrubba, Clifford J. 2005. “Courts and Compliance in International Regulatory Regimes.” Journal of Politics 67(3): 669689.
Cox, Michael, Ikenberry, G. John, and Inoguchi, Takashi, eds. 2000. American Democracy Promotion: Impulses, Strategies, and Impacts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
de Figueiredo, Rui Jose Pacheco Jr., and Weingast, Barry R.. 2005. “Self-Enforcing Federalism.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 21(1): 103135.
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N.. 1996. “Is the Good News About Compliance Good News About Cooperation?International Organization 50(3): 379406.
Duffield, John S. 2003. “Asia-Pacific Security Institutions in Comparative Perspective.” In International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific, edited by G. John Ikenberry, and Michael Mastanduno, 243270, Chapter 7. New York: Columbia University Press.
Engel, Charles, and Rogers, John H.. 1996. “How Wide is the Border?American Economic Review 86(5): 11121125.
Fearon, James D. 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49(3): 379414.
Fearon, James D, and Laitin, David D.. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review 97(1): 7590.
Hendrickson, David C. 2003. Peace Pact: The Lost World of the American Founding. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
Henkin, Louis. 1979. How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hirshleifer, Jack. 1995. “Anarchy and its Breakdown.” Journal of Political Economy 103(1): 2652.
Hoffman, Aaron M. 2006. Building Trust: Overcoming Suspicion in International Conflict. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Keohane, Robert O, and Nye, Joseph S.. 1977. Power and Interdependence. Boston: Little Brown.
King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 2001. “Explaining Rare Events in International Relations.” International Organization 55(3): 693715.
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Dunan. 2001. “The Rational Design of International Institutions.” International Organization 55(4): 761799.
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kraus, Michael, and Stanger, Allison. 2000. “The Past as Prologue.” In Irreconcilable Differences? Explaining Czechoslovakia’s Dissolution, edited by Michael Kraus, and Allison Stanger, 16. New York: Rowan and Littlefield.
Kučera, Milan, and Pavlik, Zdeněk. 1995. “Czech and Slovak Demography.” In The End of Czechoslovakia, edited by Jiří Musil, 1539, Chapter 2. New York: Central European University Press.
Lake, David A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Leff, Carol Skalnik. 1988. National Conflict in Czechoslovakia: The Making and Remaking of a State, 1918–87. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Leff, Carol Skalnik. 1997. The Czech and Slovak Republics: Nation Versus State. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Mearsheimer, John J. 1994. “The False Promise of International Institutions.” International Security 19(3): 549.
Milner, Helen. 1991. “The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique.” Review of International Studies 17(1): 6785.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. “The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe.” International Organization 54(2): 217252.
Musil, Jiří. 1995. “Introduction.” In The End of Czechoslovakia, edited by Jiří Musil, 111, Chapter 1. New York: Central European University Press.
Muthoo, Abhinay. 1999. Bargaining Theory with Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nitsch, Volker. 2003. “National Borders and International Trade: Evidence from the European Union.” Canadian Journal of Economics 33(4): 10911105.
Nugent, Neil. 2003. Government and Politics of the European Union, 5th ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Oatley, Thomas H. 2012. International Political Economy, 5th ed. New York: Longman.
Onuf, Peter S. 1983. The Origins of the Federal Republic: Jurisdictional Controversies in the United States, 1775–81. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Organski, Abramo Fimo Kenneth 1958. World Politics. New York: Knopf.
O’Rourke, Ronald. 2012. Navy Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN) Homeporting at Mayport: Background and Issues for Congress. CRS Report for Congress R40248. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Poggi, Gianfranco. 1978. The Development of the Modern State: A Sociological Introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Powell, Robert. 1994. “Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate.” International Organization 48(2): 313344.
Powell, Robert. 2004. “Bargaining and Learning While Fighting.” American Journal of Political Science 48(2): 344361.
Reinhardt, Eric. 2001. “Adjudication without Enforcement in GATT Disputes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 45(2): 174195.
Riker, William H. 1980. “Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 74(2): 432446.
Ritter, Emily H., and Wolford, Scott. 2012. “Bargaining and the Effectiveness of International Criminal Regimes.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 24(2): 149171.
Rodrik, Dani. 2000. “How Far Will International Economic Integration Go?Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(1): 177186.
Rubinstein, Ariel. 1982. “Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model.” Econometrica 53(1): 97109.
Russett, Bruce, and Oneal, John. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Schelling, Thomas C. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Schweller, Randall L. 1996. “Neorealism’s Status Quo Bias: What Security Dilemma?Security Studies 5(3): 90121.
Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. “Institutional Selection in International Relations: State Anarchy as Order.” International Organization 48(4): 527557.
Tilly, Charles. 1992. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992 Revised Edition. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Vasquez, John A. 2009. The War Puzzle Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Voeten, Erik. 2005. “The Political Origins of the UN Security Council’s Ability to Legitimize the Use of Force.” International Organization 59(3): 527557.
Wagner, R. Harrison. 2007. War and the State: The Theory of International Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1970. “The Myth of National Interdependence.” In International Cooperation, edited by Charles P. Kindleberger, 205223. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Weingast, Barry R. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” American Political Science Review 91(2): 245263.
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2): 391425.
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Werner, Suzanne, and Yuen, Amy. 2005. “Making and Keeping Peace.” International Organization 59(2): 261292.
Žák, Václav. 1995. “The Velvet Divorce–Institutional Foundations.” In The End of Czechoslovakia, edited by Jiří Musil, 245268, Chapter 13. New York: Central European University Press.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Choosing anarchy: institutional alternatives and the global order

  • Moonhawk Kim (a1) and Scott Wolford (a2)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.