Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Give it up for climate change: a defence of the beneficiary pays principle

  • Edward A. Page (a1)
Abstract

This article focuses on the normative problem of establishing how the burdens associated with implementing policies designed to prevent, or manage, climate change should be shared amongst states involved in ongoing international climate change negotiations. This problem has three key features: identifying the nature and extent of the burdens that need to be borne; identifying the type of agent that should be allocated these burdens; and distributing amongst the particular ‘tokens’ of the relevant ‘agent type’ climatic burdens according to principles that none could reasonably reject. The article defends a key role in climatic burden-sharing policy for the principle that states benefiting most from activities that cause climate change should bear the greatest burden in terms of the costs of preventing dangerous climate change. I outline two versions of this ‘beneficiary pays’ principle; examine the strengths and weakness of each version; and explore how the most plausible version (which I call the ‘unjust enrichment’ principle) could be operationalized in the context of global climate governance.

Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: e.a.page@warwick.ac.uk
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Neil Adger . 2010. “Climate Change, Human Well-being and Insecurity.” New Political Economy 15(2):275292.

Myles R. Allen Richard Lord . 2004. “The Blame Game: Who will pay for the Damaging Consequences of Climate Change.” Nature 432:551552.

Paul Baer , Glenn Fieldman , Tom Athanasiou Sivan Kartha . 2008. “Greenhouse Development Rights: Towards an Equitable Framework for Global Climate Policy.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 21(4):649669.

Daniel Butt . 2007. “On Benefiting from Injustice.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37(1):129152.

Simon Caney 2006. “Environmental Degradation, Reparations, and the Moral Significance of History.” Journal of Social Philosophy 37(3):464482.

Simon Caney 2010. “Climate Change and the Duties of the Advantaged.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13(1):203228.

Rob Dellink , Michael Den Elzen , Harry Aiking , Emmy Bergsma , Frans Berkhout , Thijs Dekker Joyeeta Gupta . 2009. “Sharing the Burden of Financing Adaptation to Climate Change.” Global Environmental Change 19:411421.

Michael Den Elzen , Michael Schaeffer Paul Lucas . 2005. “Differentiating Future Commitments on the Basis of Countries’ Relative Historical Responsibility for Climate Change.” Climatic Change 71:277301.

Joel Feinberg . 1990. The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Vol. 4: Harmless Wrongdoing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Axel Gosseries . 2004. “Historical Emissions and Free-Riding.” Ethical Perspectives 11(1):3660.

Dennis Klimchuk . 2007. “The Scope and Structure of Unjust Enrichment.” University of Toronto Law Journal 57(4):795817.

Lukas Meyer Dominic Roser . 2010. “Climate Justice and Historical Emissions.” Critical Review of Social and Political Philosophy 13(1):229253.

David Miller . 2001. “Distributing Responsibilities.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 9(4):453471.

Eric Neumayer . 2000. “In Defence of Historical Responsibility for Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” Ecological Economics 33:185192.

Edward A. Page 2006. Climate Change, Justice and Future Generations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Edward A. Page 2008. “Distributing the Burdens of Climate Change.” Environmental Politics 17(4):556575.

Edward A. Page 2011. “Climatic Justice and Atmospheric Burdens.” The Monist 94(3):412432.

Martin Parry , Jason Lowe Clair Hanson . 2009. “Overshoot, Adapt and Recover.” Nature 458:11021103.

Henry Shue . 1993. “Subsistence Emissions and Luxury Emissions.” Law & Policy 15(1):3959.

Henry Shue 1999. “Global Environment and International Inequality.” International Affairs 75(3):531545.

Richard Starkey . 2011. “Assessing Common(s) Arguments for an Equal per Capita Allocation.” The Geographical Journal 177(2):112126.

Simon Caney 2009. ‘Justice and distribution of greenhouse gas emissions.’ Journal of Global Ethics 5(2):125146.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Theory
  • ISSN: 1752-9719
  • EISSN: 1752-9727
  • URL: /core/journals/international-theory
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 23
Total number of PDF views: 197 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 491 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.